Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo Auction Link (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Farmall & IHC Tractors Discussion Forum
:

66 Series Debate

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
Dan

02-06-2004 21:55:21




Report to Moderator

I was looking back at the big debate about 1066 tractors. All I know is this. We have an 806 with 13-15,000 hours conservatively, and a 1256 with 10,000. Both have been excellent tractors and still have original engines. We have a 1066 black stripe with 5200 hours, and the motor went out for the second time today. The first time it dropped a valve, and the second time it looks like it threw a rod. It had excellent care from us, and the farmer we bought it from. It is not turned up, nor has it been. I am sure part of it is just bad luck, but in Iowa, where I am from, 75% of the 10's listed with 5000 hours have been overhauled.

I believe our old 8 will run forever. In fact, the only thing I can see wrong with the 06-56 series tractor is the shift, but to me it is no big deal. I find it funny that when they came out with the 66 series, the only thing that they seem to have kept was the shift, and downgraded every thing else. Ours has a cab, and when I had trouble recently with the range transmision lever, I had to disassemble the right hand cowl of the tractor to get to it. Who was the genius that eliminated the cowl cover on the 06-56 series? "Why take out six bolts and one panel, when you can take out 12 and three or four panels?" must have been their motto.

I am a die hard red fan, but I do believe that the only reason IH came out with the 66 series is that they weren't selling enough parts. The 66 series seal International's fate, in my opinion. Anyone still clinging to the beauty of the 1066 is welcome to ours when we get a motor in it. Until then, imagine the 66 series if it were a 1456 with a powershift. That would be a beautiful tractor, wouldn't it?

[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
Al Hanson

02-07-2004 22:23:02




Report to Moderator
 Re: 66 Series Debate in reply to Dan, 02-06-2004 21:55:21  
We have had a 1976 model 1066 since it was new. It now has 8400 hours on it and the motor has never been overhauled. It still starts and runs as good as it did the day we bought it. If you put a water filter on them and change it every 250 hours it should run for 10,000 hours easy.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Matt K.

02-07-2004 13:44:09




Report to Moderator
 Re: 66 Series Debate in reply to Dan, 02-06-2004 21:55:21  
My understanding is that the 1066,s with the
black stripe had more trouble versus the white
stripe, our 1974 (white stripe) is still running strong and was putting out around 140-145 Hp. a few years ago.I can,t say a bad thing about it,
been a good old workhorse for us.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
JD Humm

02-07-2004 08:12:12




Report to Moderator
 Re: 66 Series Debate in reply to Dan, 02-06-2004 21:55:21  
I am with Dan and Hugh on the 66 series opinions. I had a brand new 76 model 1566. Dad's 1256 would walk circles around that tractor. The cab on the 15 was not much quiter than the aftermarket Excel cab we had on the 1256. Deere, on the other hand, was in the fourth year of the sound gard bodies and walking away. The 86 series was kind of a worked over 66 with a quiet cab. Shifting sucks on the 86's, we now have two of them. As was stated before, a 1456 follow up tractor with power shift and a quiet cab would have been a wiser tractor to build. The 66's were not a step forward, they were a step sideways and maybe back a little bit.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Hugh MacKay

02-07-2004 12:52:10




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: 66 Series Debate in reply to JD Humm, 02-07-2004 08:12:12  
JD: Good to hear from you. I was nosing around over at Red Power last night for a while, still haven't figured out how to use it. Probably just as well, the family tell me I spend too much time on this computer anyhow.

I was looking throught the list of the 60 heavy users at RPM. I see you are leader of the pack. How has the Power Stroke worked out for you.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
JD Humm

02-08-2004 07:28:39




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: 66 Series Debate in reply to Hugh MacKay, 02-07-2004 12:52:10  
Hello Hugh

Haven't had a lot of time the last few months, mainly just look at that forum and hardly ever come over here anymore, though I really do like this site, too.

The PSD is doing really well, sits in the garage most of the time though and is spoiled. Still only 17,000 miles on it and it is close to two years old now.

Good to hear from you, too. I still have your email address.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Hugh MacKay

02-07-2004 02:41:28




Report to Moderator
 Re: 66 Series Debate in reply to Dan, 02-06-2004 21:55:21  
Dan: And there are countless stories like yours across North America. I have always said IH reached perfection at 56 series. Since then it has been down hill and in my opinion the merger with Case didn't stop that. And your right it is about selling parts. There are some skeletons coming out of closet on Magniums similar to the 1066 boondoggle.

I was at a CaseIH parts counter last spring, standing in line, with the water pump from my 1963 - 140. Guy next to me said,"That is an original pump. We have a little 25 hp CaseIH at farm, new in 1990 and on it's 3rd water pump." That is the goal today my friend to have that new tractor needing parts before you get it home. I can not understand how society puts up with this nonsence in cars, trucks and tractors. It is just run run run for parts and service from the day it is new, and by the time it is 5 to 7 years old the bloddy computer will not even tell you what is wrong anymore.

My friend it really has not a lot to do with just your 1066. We were buying new cars, trucks and tractors in the 1960's that the dealer never saw again after the day of sale. So the industry just decided to increase the price and change to junk product at same time. And North Americans are still buying.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
hagan

02-07-2004 07:57:57




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: 66 Series Debate in reply to Hugh MacKay, 02-07-2004 02:41:28  
what skeletons are comming out of the closet on the Magnums? My local dealer said the Magnum is the best product he has ever sold "hands down" Sure there were some early problems with the early engines but who makes a perfect tractor?
One of my magnums has over 5000 hours and no problems exept a leaking break o ring and it was fixed with the warrinaty. They are still "new tractors" as compared to the 1066 and 1086 I was running in the 80's with aproximately same hours and I was putting 500-800 hours a year and interest was 16% a fellow could not afford to give them away nor hardly fix them. I shucked the 1066 & 86 as fast as possible after a couple good years and have never looked back. I did purchase a 806 (look under International 806) I had owned the same tractor before. Yes IH did a gread job with the 06 and 56 models but the 806 was always a better tillage tractor than the 856 in my eyes cause the 806 had 34 inch tires and 33% TA and the 56 had 38 inch tires and 22% TA. I hope there will still be Magnums around to purchase while I farm for 10 to 12 more years and then my son can decide. One thing that has always made me loyal to IH is we have always had a Super IH dealer! Now he is a CaseIH dealer and I purchased a little Hesston equipment from the local Deere Dealer and realized how well I was treated at the IH dealer.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Hugh MacKay

02-07-2004 12:42:57




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: 66 Series Debate in reply to hagan, 02-07-2004 07:57:57  
hagan: My first experience with Farmalls were letter series. My farm saw at least one new tractor from every series all the way from letter series through to 66 series. I watched that tractor evolve and with everyone there were improvments, until 56 series. For the dollars being put out they were an excellent buy into the early 70's. Remember we were only paying $60. per hp for a new tractor back then, not the $700. to $1,000. per hp we are paying today for a new tractor. And where have your farm commodities gone? Didn't follow the tractor.

Cavitation is indeed happening with Maginums. For the money being put out for new tractors today, you should have an unconditional guarentee that not one bolt need come out of the valve cover or oil pan for the first 15,000 hours. It should be 100% percent of the entire engine except turbo and injection system. Lets face it, if you are going to pay top dollar you want top product.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Mitchissippi

02-07-2004 07:31:06




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: 66 Series Debate in reply to Hugh MacKay, 02-07-2004 02:41:28  
This is an honest question - not meaning to stir the pot, just curious because the 1066 we have is the only Farmall I've ever been around.

I've heard the praises of the 56 series a lot here lately. What, exactly, made them a better tractor than the 66 series?



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Dan

02-07-2004 10:11:13




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: 66 Series Debate in reply to Mitchissippi, 02-07-2004 07:31:06  
In my opinion, and anyone is free to disagree. The 06-56 series had the better engine. The engine was dry sleveed, so electrolosis isn't a problem. But besides that, they just run forever. It isn't hard to find an 806 or 12 or 14 that has an engine that hasn't been touched.

Second, they are easier to work on to some degree. The styling done on the 1066 seems to mean you have to remove more bolts, more tin, to get to what you are working on.

Third, I don't like the injector pump on the 1066. You don't seem to have any power unless they are wide open. Grinding feed, for instance, with the grinder full I can let out on the clutch on the 1256, it will pull at an idle, you can hear it open up. The 1066 will die. It doesn't seem to lug at low rpms.

I just think the 06-56 series is a longer lived tractor with less hassle. If I were buying an older tractor for auger work or chore work, I think a 1206-1256 is a better tractor at a cheaper price, even though it has a few more years. The only thing to miss is air conditioning.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Cliff Neubauer

02-07-2004 15:47:20




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: 66 Series Debate in reply to Dan, 02-07-2004 10:11:13  
When our 1086 was new it was doggy like your 1066 is, our IH dealer said the pump was set wrong at the factory somehow so they put a new one on it and it will really lug now. There is alot that can be done in an injector pump besides turning the fuel up that can make a big difference in performance.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
JD Humm

02-07-2004 08:16:13




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: 66 Series Debate in reply to Mitchissippi, 02-07-2004 07:31:06  
The 56's had the 407 engine, almost indestructable. A lot of them out there have yet to be overhauled. As stated above I had a new 1566 and it would not hold a candle to the 1256 we had at the same time. The 56 series should go down in history as IH's finest hour.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Barnstormer

02-07-2004 17:58:27




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: 66 Series Debate in reply to JD Humm, 02-07-2004 08:16:13  
i would have to disagree,i don't know what others have had for luck with 66 or 86 series tractors but we have had good luck with them.we have 3 1066s 1 white stripe and 2 black stripe one of which has the 86 series clutch and ta housings on it.we have a 1456 and a 1206, the 10s are all turned up and the 1456 will not even come close to the work the 10s will do.also the 06-56 series tractors start hard in cold weather,where the 10s will start with no aid at 25 degrees.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Hugh MacKay

02-07-2004 22:26:58




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 66 Series Debate in reply to Barnstormer, 02-07-2004 17:58:27  
Barnstormer: Any tractor should start unassisted at 25 degrees F. Also I don't believe anyone is suggesting 66 series didn't put out the horse power. I have never seen a 66 series that wouldn't exceed it's rated hp as it came from factory.

Problem is they are not efficient. I bought my 1066 new in 1975 and in 8 years put 10,000 hours on it. It was a real hog on fuel especially on light work, now I didn't need to use mine on light work. All 66 series tractors that came to our area came without water filters, and 90% of them fell to cavitation around 8 years, didn't matter whether it had 2,000 hours or 10,000 hours. One heck of a heart breaker for the guy with 2,000 hours on his machine. There are 56 series tractors over 20,000 hours that have never been rebuilt, not a lot but a few. Very few 06 and 56 tractors didn't make 10,000 hours to first engine rebuild. Most 966 and 1066 had engine rebuilds before 5,000 hours. Many of them are still under 10,000 hours and had 2 engine rebuilds.

I was luckey 1066 at 10,000 hours in 8 years, 656D at 10,000 hours in 15 years 560D 11,000 hours in 17 years and a 100 hp Deere 14,000 hours 15 years. Those figures are hours and years to first engine rebuild. Most 1066 didn't even come close to that.

Remember only efficient tractors will make money for you,doesn't matter how much hp they have. In my opinion with new tractors approaching the $1,000. per horse power range, they damn well should have a 15,000 hour, absolute guarentee on the engine, maybe even the whole tractor.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Hugh MacKay again

02-08-2004 17:46:49




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 66 Series Debate in reply to Hugh MacKay, 02-07-2004 22:26:58  
To Al Hanson and Redman: I have never had a real big problem with 66 series tractors. The real problem was IH. Their engineers knew full well before they built the first 66 series tractor with wet sleeves, what the problems would be associated with cavitation. They also knew how to reduce the problem, yet they chose to put those tractors on the market without water filters. And furthermore for close to 8 years after the first ones hit the market still did nothing.

This was new technology to the new tractor buyers in the 1970's. It is my belief that with proper care every 66 series tractor out there could have and should have gone 15,000 to first engine rebuild. At 8 years of age and approaching 10,000 hours in 1982, I would have said my tractor was headed for 15,000 hours to first engine rebuild. Then one day during fall tillage my heat gauge started rising, too late anti freeze in crankcase.

Since that time I have seen countless adds for used 1066's, yes thousands of them 4,000 to 7,000 hours and a freshly rebuilt engine. On the other hand stories such as you tell of your tractors are few and far between. This type of thing is not unique to IH tractors. Everything we buy today is the same. 5 year old automobiles with an oil pan leak from rust, absolutely unheard of in the 1960's. All this wouldn't be too bad if they still sold these things at pre 1960 prices. That is afterall the deal on agricultural commodities, pre 1960's prices.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Al Hanson

02-08-2004 11:58:11




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 66 Series Debate in reply to Hugh MacKay, 02-07-2004 22:26:58  
We have three 66 series tractors, A 1066 with 8,400 hours, A 966 with 7,000 hours, 4166 with 4,300 hours . We have never had to overhaul any of them. The 1066 was bought new in 1976, It did not have a water filter on it when we bought it. We put one on when the kits came out. Before that we changed coolant every year. I have only heard of two 66 series tractors in this area that had to be overhauled because of cavitation both were 966's .

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Redman

02-08-2004 08:51:09




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 66 Series Debate in reply to Hugh MacKay, 02-07-2004 22:26:58  
i do understand the water filter deal and cavitation,what i don't understand is why people whine about the 66 series tractors.for a poor tractor they sure sold a pile odf them.if they are that big of a heap i'll pay 2500 a piece for them all day long,non running.that is salvage price for them,the 06-56 series are cheaper on the lots for a reason.never had a rear out of a 10 or a tranny,2 of ours are running well over 200hp one of which made 13000 hours before the first overhaul,and part of those hours were put on on the track at 4500 rpm.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
mike

02-07-2004 09:11:05




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: 66 Series Debate in reply to JD Humm, 02-07-2004 08:16:13  
you people must b on drugs i have had several 1256-1456-706 806 tractors and none will do the job of a good turned up 1066 or 1466, i have farmed with them all includeing 2 5488 , my pick is still the 1066, as for the electrollisis, only replaced one set of sleeves, my brother plugged the rad in my 1066, bushogging and got it hot, cooked the orings on the bottom of the sleeves, so all you guys that want rid of your 1066 post it you wont own it long,

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Dan

02-07-2004 10:02:57




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: 66 Series Debate in reply to mike, 02-07-2004 09:11:05  
I can tell you we got our 1256 hot at 8000 hours. It has smoked pretty good after that, it also started using a pretty good deal of oil because of it. I am sure the rings are shot. But we keep adding oil daily, and we are 30 hours from 10,000. If we hadn't have blown that radiator hose, she would still be going strong for sometime to come. I suppose know though, another 1000 hours or so, and we will have to break down and overhaul it.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Jim in NC

02-07-2004 05:31:03




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: 66 Series Debate in reply to Hugh MacKay, 02-07-2004 02:41:28  
Hmmmm..... that must be why when Gramp's Falcon station wagon got totalled with 277000 miles on it the Ford dealer couldn't sell him another one. He had put six sets of tires and a BUNCH of oil and filters in it..... he thought it was a pretty fair value that car!



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Hugh MacKay

02-07-2004 15:25:33




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: 66 Series Debate in reply to Jim in NC, 02-07-2004 05:31:03  
Jim: And there was all kinds of them that way, Chevys, Fords and Dodges and they all went 2 and 300,000 miles on nothing but fuel, lubs, tires, exhaust and battery. They were good value for the money. If there was something wrong the old guy at the local gas station, who had been there since before the automobile, could tell you in 5 min what the problem was.

Look at household appliances, used to be if you wanted quality you paid a little more. Now all that would achive it waste a bit more money. My good wife has an electric can opener, automatic it's called. Made by Philips in the good old USA. It was given to us as a wedding present 39 years ago. What more can I say, corperate America is robbing us blind.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy