Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo Auction Link (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Farmall & IHC Tractors Discussion Forum
:

Purchasing my first antique tractor

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
Tom in PA

11-24-2004 07:32:07




Report to Moderator

Greetings- I was hoping some of you "in the know" may be able to help me with a decision I'll be making in the near future. My wife and I have recently purchased 5 acres of land and I want to buy a tractor to use as a workhorse as we build our home. I am particularily fond of the Farmall M. I prefer a wide-front because our land has a gentle slope (about 4-5 degrees). My wife is concerned that a narrow front tractor will rollover(?) My kids will likely be driving the tractor at some point. My oldest son is soon to be 6. I primarily need a blade, a bucket loader, and a finish mower. My friends are trying to steer me towards an 8N saying that the implements I want are more easily located for a Ford tractor rather than a Farmall. Could you guys please share some info with me... I have located a Farmall H that is near me with a snow blade, that sounds like it could be a good option but I'm still looking. I found a wide front M model yesterday sitting along the highway. It didn't look bad, but need rubber (front and rear). Could you guys give me an idea what a set of tires cost for an M? Also, can you help prove or dispell the myth that a narrow front end is easy to roll over?

Thanks - I look forward to your replies.

Tom in PA

[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
Hugh MacKay again

11-25-2004 04:23:16




Report to Moderator
 Re: Purchasing my first antique tractor in reply to Tom in PA, 11-24-2004 07:32:07  
Tom: Just another word on your lot development. When I bought the farm from my dad, he moved to a new place not far away. He proceeded to reshape the entire lot. Frist few times he came for the 560 with loader. He came once and 560 was busy on farm. He reluctantly took a skid steer loader. From that time on it was never the 560, I had to go to dad's place for, it was the skid loader. Those skid loaders I used mainly for barn work, thus in summer one loader was not esential. Dad parctically took possession of the parked loader all summer.

The very first vehicle my kids learned to drive was skid steer loader. With ROPS protection and seat belt, much safer than SA, 130, 300 or 560. At 12 years of age my daughter actually did jobs for people, with skid loader earning a bit of money for herself. Actually she took it further than a bit. At one point I suggested she might consider buying her own loader rather than wearing dad's out completely.

On the mower tractor, I have a Super A with a 5 foot Woods belly mower. Have been a Farmall man all my life. I like the Woods mower very much, and of course you would never get me to part with that Super A. However I the height of Super A is not the most desirable for mowing. I have had to trim some branches from ornamental trees and a hedge row, that I really didn't want to do. Trees give you great wind break as well as privacy. Just maybe, an 8N or Fergie would be more practical for me. I kept a hand push mower for mowing under those trees, haha that didn't last long.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Fdew

11-27-2004 16:45:26




Report to Moderator
 Re: Purchasing my first antique tractor in reply to Hugh MacKay again, 11-25-2004 04:23:16  
Sad but true. A Farmall tractor is not the best answer for any of those jobs.
Having said that I hasten to add that I would get one!

A skid steer is a better loader. A commercial mower (like a Ferris) is a much better finish mower. But for jobs you don't do all the time the Farmall is a lot more fun.

I would go ahead and get a H or M with a loader, It will be very handy during construction and after. I have a 200 with a blade and a platform on the two point hitch and I use it a lot to move snow or to carry things around. If I had a loader that would be even better. There is way to much mowing to be done if you put most of that 5 acres to grass, I would get a used commercial mower for that.

Frank

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
lee

11-26-2004 09:43:16




Report to Moderator
 Re: Purchasing my first antique tractor in reply to Hugh MacKay again, 11-25-2004 04:23:16  
Good post, good advice. The right tool for the job, IH or not.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Hugh MacKay

11-24-2004 17:03:00




Report to Moderator
 Re: Purchasing my first antique tractor in reply to Tom in PA, 11-24-2004 07:32:07  
Tom: You sound to me as though you will be into shaping, grading and landscaping, for that you are going to need a loader. Farmalls, large and small are just not loader tractors. Farmalls are just about the finest drawbar animal going. That is precisely what they were designed for.

If I were starting out on 5 acres of lot with no buildings and no landscaping, the very first item I would buy is a new or near new 45 hp skid steer loader. If your doing much of the work yourself, it will pay for itself. If you happen to have the bonus of being around neighbors, who don't have one, you will find yourself draging in good pocket money on the side.

When you get this project well on the way then buy your mower tractor, SA, 8N, etc. Either one will also do good on a snow blade. Then heck you wont even need a snow blade, as you will not be willing to part with the skid loader.

I had a Farmall 560 wf with IH 2000 loader on farm. I needed a second loader for small confined areas. I bought a new 45 hp skid loader, two years later I bought a 2nd skid loader to replace 560. Yes the 2000 loader was taken off the 560 forever and 560 went back to doing what it does best, drawbar work.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Gene

11-24-2004 22:15:29




Report to Moderator
 Re: Purchasing my first antique tractor in reply to Hugh MacKay, 11-24-2004 17:03:00  
Second Hugh's comments concerning the skid steer. Have a Bobcat 610 - 30 Horse Power. It's been used for hauling gravel from the stream, landscaping chores, construction, cleaning up trash, skidding trees off of cleared land and moving machinery. A very handy outfit.

This is an IH board - you are going to get mostly IH recommendations. I also have a WD Allis Chalmers with live power, live hydraulics, and a 3-point. You can purchase a WD series (30 to 40 HP range) tractor cheaper than one of the Fords and in the same price range as a H or an M.

Having said all of that a Super C would be nice.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
captaink

11-24-2004 08:42:10




Report to Moderator
 Re: Purchasing my first antique tractor in reply to Tom in PA, 11-24-2004 07:32:07  
A wide front works better in snow and mud, is somewhat more stable than a narrow front since the weight of the front is distributed away from a small area directly under the tractor. The drawback is you loose some maneuverability, turning radius, and the ability to “stick the nose” of the tractor in a tight spot. Really as far as rolling over, the operator has as much to do with this as the tractor.

I have an M under a loader. I have a wide front, live hydraulics, and power steering on it. In my opinion this is the only way to go on an M. As one other post suggests the newer IH models with the TA, have live PTO and live hydraulics, making them a good logical choice if you aren’t biased towards the M appearance and style.

Just my 2 cents…

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
JBlavl

11-24-2004 10:47:53




Report to Moderator
 Re: Purchasing my first antique tractor in reply to captaink, 11-24-2004 08:42:10  
Before I say anything keep in mind this is JMO.

I think the M is a fine tractor. I never understood why Ford put the left wheel brake next to the clutch. Yeah works great if your stuck and are trying to get out but when you want to stop the tractor you push in the clutch and then oh rats you only have one brake to work with. Pain if you ask me.

Roll over? If you watch TV maybe you have seen the commercials for the Pontiac Grand Am or Grand Prix. "Wider is better". However looking at this from an engineering aspect a low COG (center of gravity) is also better. Hence grand prix cars are super low and wide for high G in the corners. Same principle applies to tractors. The lower the COG and wider it is the better on hilly terrain.

Implements? Should be readily available for both.

And last but not least I am partial to IH so i would get one of those. And not that it is any of my buisness but a Farmall M is much to big for a 6 year old. Give him/her at least 6 or 7 more years before they even think about trying it.

Again JMO

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
James in East Texas

11-24-2004 09:47:09




Report to Moderator
 Re: Purchasing my first antique tractor in reply to captaink, 11-24-2004 08:42:10  
I agree with the captain on the wide front issue. I believe the rollover potential is basically the same with wide or narrow front on the Farmall letter series tractors, although theoretically the wide front should be more stable. Some claim they steer better too. I believe the little Ford 8N is less likely to roll over, although it would be a less sentimental choice.
The Fords all have a 3-point hitch and many of the Farmalls don't even have a fast hitch. I assume that's what your friends are referring to with the implement availability. You can find 3-point hitch blades and mowers cheap. The 2-point and drag-type implements are a little less easy to find in my experience.
Darnit,I guess the Ford would be a more practical choice. But when I sit up high on that Super C with the belly mower working under me with the hum of that Farmall engine, I think now this is all right.
But speaking of practical, my wife wishes I would trade in the Super C, the Cub, the old Massey and Ford for a Kubota with a loader, ROPS, and 5 foot mower.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
dhermesc

11-24-2004 08:03:14




Report to Moderator
 Re: Purchasing my first antique tractor in reply to Tom in PA, 11-24-2004 07:32:07  
The M and Ford are two totally differant animals. The Ford will be a better pick for the finish mower aspect, (M would be better if looking at a brish hog) neither are that great for blading (Ford lack the weight to do a decent job - M lacks rear control arms). Its about a wash on the front loader (neither are very handy especially for a novice).

Personally I'd move up a couple years and get a 300 - 350 (utility or row crop) or a 400 - 450. You gain live hydraulics and live PTO along with the live two point set up. Makes using the tractor much easier and you still retain that "old style" look. They can also be purchased for a price close to the H or M.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Allan in NE

11-24-2004 08:02:09




Report to Moderator
 Re: Purchasing my first antique tractor in reply to Tom in PA, 11-24-2004 07:32:07  
Hi Tom, Gotta go with your wife on this one..... ...Well, to a degree.

I think for what you are wanting to accomplish that you'd be happier with a lower center of gravity type utility tractor.

Don't know if that little 8N is horse enough for what you want to do, but there are a little bigger sized U-type tractors around all over the place just waiting for a new home.

Find one with live power and one that is equipped with power steering. It will just make your tractor experience more enjoyable.

Be careful with those youngsters around the tractor too! These things are fun, but they can kill, wound or mame before you know what happend.

Allan

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
rustyfarmall

11-24-2004 07:46:25




Report to Moderator
 Re: Purchasing my first antique tractor in reply to Tom in PA, 11-24-2004 07:32:07  
Boy, you ask a lot of questions, first off, the facts do point out that a wide front is safer, but only in extreme conditions. Many of us here grew up driving narrow front tractors and have never had so much as a close call with one. It all has to do with operator skill and common sense. The narrow front tractor will be just fine. Now for the tire question, Figure on paying somewhere around $500 for a set of rear tires, if you shop around and don't get in a hurry, you can beat that price by quite a bit. If you really like the Farmall M then that is what you should get, but never underestimate the Farmall H, it also is a viable option. Equipment and attachments for the Farmalls is as easily found as for the little Ford, and the Farmall H or M will do a lot more work.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
SAm in NS

11-24-2004 07:44:59




Report to Moderator
 Re: Purchasing my first antique tractor in reply to Tom in PA, 11-24-2004 07:32:07  
On the roll over front - please bear in mind this is just my personal opinion. A tractor, no matter what configuration is only as safe as the person sat on the seat. From what I can tell a NFE will roll over more easily than a WFE, but I can't tell you how much more easily. My thinking is that if you get one with a NFE and are consquently more careful using it, it may be "safer" than the WFE if you drove it like you're invincible. Also where you have your rear tires set is a major factor in how stable the tractor is. You say you want to use a Loader, for this you are probably going to be better of with a WFE, but whichever you get it will make it significantly more difficult to steer and you probably want to look for a tractor with live hydraulics otherwise you loader'll stop everytime you push the clutch in. You also mention using a finish mower, you'll probably find a smaller tractor would be much better for this application due to the weight and size amongst other things. Hope this helps, SAm in NS

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Tom in PA

11-24-2004 10:42:18




Report to Moderator
 We're on a roll now in reply to SAm in NS, 11-24-2004 07:44:59  
Okay - I understand the idea behind the live PTO now... so -- when I'm looking at the M models that have the hydraulic lines coming from the transmission they are not a live setup right? The live hydraulic pump mounts near the distributor correct?

The M model I looked at yesterday had two hydraulic style fittings coming out of one side of the belly and one coming out the other. Can someone explain how these setups work please?

Also - I looked at a Farmall 450 gas. It had the TA and I think it had a 3pt hitch too. The only thing that concerns me about that is the TA. I've been lurking around on the board here and reading about TA's on the net. I understand that if you operate them improperly you can be talking about a serious amount of cash... how exactly do these work?

I really like the M w/ the wide frt, but I don't want to have to spend a ton of cash to make it do what I need...

We were talking about the scrape blade. One of you mentioned there are no control arms on the M. If I purchased the 3pt conversion there would be - correct? But then I'm also going to need the live hydraulic pump and related servos/lines so that I have both lift and downforce - right?

You guys are right - I am asking a bunch of questions, I just want to make sure that I am doing the right thing here.

Since I bought this land I have to sell a 1979 IH Scout II that I spent 3 years doing a body-off-frame restoration on - I'm going to miss it for sure, and am looking for a nice RED tractor to take its place. I realize the Ford may be more practical, but it isn't an IH. I know in this forum you gentlemen understand that.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Dave (IL)

11-24-2004 11:32:31




Report to Moderator
 Re: We're on a roll now in reply to Tom in PA, 11-24-2004 10:42:18  
Grew up on an H in the 50's. Mowed hiways in NE IL in early 60's using both 8N's and 641's.
Got back in charge of the original farm house with 3 acres last year. Bought an H with a loader and drawbar mower. Forgot just how miserable those 8N's were without live hydraulics.
You will hate it if you don't have live hydraulics. An override clutch handles the lack of live PTO for mowing. Drawbar mower needs LOTS of turning room. And you don't realize how tall an H (let alone an M) is until you mow around trees.
I just bought a 641 Ford with bucket and BushHog. I would have jumped all over a 300/350 utility with loader for $3000!

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
PA Steve

11-24-2004 11:10:26




Report to Moderator
 Re: We're on a roll now in reply to Tom in PA, 11-24-2004 10:42:18  
Live PTO, live hydraulics and 3pt hitch certainly make a tractor more versatile and user friendly. However, I gather that you're doing this more for fun and will not be spending long hours on the machine. If you enjoy the look of the M, not having live hydraulics or PTO will not bother you. We've been using our H with a loader and single action (one-way) hydraulics to load stones, manure, etc. for years and it works just fine on our 16 acre place. I believe you will have little trouble finding a pull-type mower. I would not get worried about a 3-pt conversion kit just yet. There are lots of implements around that you can use with your Farmall and I think you'll enjoy using them. The arrangement you referred to on the M you saw is likely a valve setup for double-action (two-way)hydraulics. This is a nice add-on for some applications, but it is still not live. The hydraulic pump will still stop when you push the clutch pedal in.
With regard to TA's, I would steer you away from them because of a potential maintenance problem. There's nothing inherently wrong with them, but their real advantage comes in heavy pulling applications (plowing), and unless you plan to do a lot of plowing, it's really not necessary. Good luck and happy farming,
Steve

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Kelly C

11-24-2004 11:06:21




Report to Moderator
 Re: We're on a roll now in reply to Tom in PA, 11-24-2004 10:42:18  
In regards to your TA question.
For the Jobs you are asking about a TA wouldn't make any difference.
Most 400's or 300's that have a bad TA. The ramp and rollers are whats broke. This prevents the TA from going into the low side.
The direct drive or high side of the TA is unaffected and can be used for years with out the need to repair. Hence all the old 400's with bad TA's. The owners just never fixed them.

I purchased my 400 with a bad TA and I replaced it with a rebuilt unit my self. cost about $500 when it was all said and done. Requires a 3 part tractor split.

If you have some one else do it figure around $1500 or so.

Or just drive the tractor on the high side for ever and never worry about it.

Bad TA's are great for the buyer and bad for the seller. You can really chop the price down when buying and not have any less of a tractor.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Brian in NY

11-24-2004 11:03:50




Report to Moderator
 Re: We're on a roll now in reply to Tom in PA, 11-24-2004 10:42:18  
Hey did you ever think about an IH 300 or 350 utility? The later models had all the things you will want--live power, power steering and 3pt hitch.

Pretty versatile tractors....I screwed up and didn't buy the 300 I saw with a nice loader, backblade, full weights and new rubber....mostly restored for $3000. I kick myself every day for that. Good luck and stay loyal to RED!



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Tom in PA

11-24-2004 11:14:44




Report to Moderator
 Where do I find my new machine? in reply to Brian in NY, 11-24-2004 11:03:50  
Well - I've definitely picked up some good info today. Can you guys make a recommendation as to where (besides here) I might look for a tractor? I am located in Northcentral PA.

Thanks Tom



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
farmerjohn

11-24-2004 18:51:42




Report to Moderator
 Re: Where do I find my new machine? in reply to Tom in PA, 11-24-2004 11:14:44  
You might try McCullough Farm Parts in Indiana county, Pa 724-254-6400 they have a lot of used equiptment as well as parts and are nice honest people.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Crop Duster

03-30-2006 16:52:16




Report to Moderator
 McCullough Farm Parts in reply to farmerjohn, 11-24-2004 18:51:42  
I just got parts at McCullough Farm Parts. Great place for used farmall parts. They even got some nice used tractors and the prices aren't half bad. Great people do deal with.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy