Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo Auction Link (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Discussion Forum
Order Ford 4000 Parts Online

4000 S-O-S clutch puzzle

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
David Tiefenbru

12-05-2000 18:06:45




Report to Moderator

The following is true of clutches 1,2 and 3 in my transmission, and my spare:

The gap between the pressure plate and the piston measures .790".

The original stack of 5 bronze plates and 5 steel plates measures .647".

The stack of plates with new bronze plates measures .792".

(the original bronze plates measure .060", the new (Ford) plates measure .090".)

The parts guys have no idea what is up with the difference.

Any ideas as to where I should "find" the missing .040"?

Thank you,
Dave

[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
Sam

12-07-2000 05:50:29




Report to Moderator
 Re: 4000 S-O-S clutch puzzle in reply to David Tiefenbrunn, 12-05-2000 18:06:45  
Dave; If the trans is of 63/ design it has a direct drive #1 clutch as opposed to the previous overunning clutch design. This uses 2 each CONN7B164A, Plate Assy int. spline, and 1P77573A, Plate Assy, ext. spline for the No. 1 brake band & direct drive clutch. The #2 $ 3 clutch uses 5 each, PBB77518A Plate Assy, ext. spline and PBB77519A Plate Assy. int. spline.
Hope this helps



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
David Tiefenrbunn

12-07-2000 19:30:39




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: 4000 S-O-S clutch puzzle in reply to Sam, 12-07-2000 05:50:29  
From previous inquiries, I belive it is a 64. It is an industrial, so the series numbers are not stamped on the casting like the "regular" tractors.

It does have the Direct drive clutch, not the overrunning clutch.

I got new steel plates (C8AP7B442A) that match the original shot ones. The bronze plates (like new condition) I have from the spare transmission. They are thicker, but the pressure plate is thinner so I swapped that too, and everything looks good for clearance, etc.

I had a machinist mig and re-bore the drum that the direct drive clutch assembles in, as the bore had grooves worn into it by the 2 steel seal rings. 5 of 5 of thst part that I have seen had the same wear on them!

Thank you,

Dave

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Sam

12-07-2000 05:50:11




Report to Moderator
 Re: 4000 S-O-S clutch puzzle in reply to David Tiefenbrunn, 12-05-2000 18:06:45  
Dave; If the trans is of 63/ design it has a direct drive #1 clutch as opposed to the previous overunning clutch design. This uses 2 each CONN7B164A, Plate Assy int. spline, and 1P77573A, Plate Assy, ext. spline for the No. 1 brake band & direct drive clutch. The #2 $ 3 clutch uses 5 each, PBB77518A Plate Assy, ext. spline and PBB77519A Plate Assy. int. spline.
Hope this helps



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Bern

12-07-2000 12:20:46




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: 4000 S-O-S clutch puzzle in reply to Sam, 12-07-2000 05:50:11  
Sam, the direct drive and #1 clutch are two different units. The later transmissions contained both. The direct drive clutch sits right behind the input shaft. The #1 clutch sits just in front of the distributor. This means that the later transmissions had 5 wet clutch packs when you include the PTO clutch.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Bern

12-05-2000 20:36:10




Report to Moderator
 Re: 4000 S-O-S clutch puzzle in reply to David Tiefenbrunn, 12-05-2000 18:06:45  
I'm a little confused myself. What .040" are you looking for? Sounds like you need to lose some thickness to me (your clutch pack I mean!).

Double check for the correct part numbers. The external splined plates should carry the number PBB77518A, and the internal splined plates should be labled PBB77519A. If that checks out, do you realize that the steel plates are to be dished? Do you realize that these plates must all face the same direction? If not, I suspect that may be where some of the problem lies.

If that's not it, what do your old .060" plates look like? Are they very worn, or do the plates have definite grooves in them like the new ones? It's possible that they are supposed to be around .060" thick, and the new ones you have are mis-packaged (would not be a first for NH!). Also, it's not uncommon to have .100" or more clutch pack clearance in some wet clutch packs. I'm not saying the SOS should be this much (sure would be nice to have some specs for this thing, no?), but clearly there needs to be ample space inside there for those plates to disengage.

Without eyeballing this thing for myself, it would be tough for me to speculate much further. Another option would be to have your dealer call NH and get print specs on both new parts to make sure you do indeed have the right parts.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
David Tiefenbrunn

12-06-2000 20:47:08




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: 4000 S-O-S clutch puzzle in reply to Bern, 12-05-2000 20:36:10  
third party image

As far as the confused / .040 part:
At the Ford dealer, by using their computerized parts - pictures - numbers look up program, I ordered 1 bronze plate, due to uncertainty of exactly what the picture showed. (it looked like the whole pack was one part)

Anyways, while looking through the parts at a local used tractor parts place, I found a clutch pack with all of the plates like the one new one I had bought, so I bought all of the used undamaged ones I could find. Also, all of the loose steel plates they had. So far, I have only found steel plates at .068" thick, and they are dished. When stacking them, I checked each to be sure they were going the same way, and the bronze ones in case they had any prefrernce "pressed" into them.

Anyways, the pack I disasembled at the used parts place, had clearance, and the pressure plate was the same thickness as both of mine. I didn't have a way to get the piston out, so I don't know if the piston or the "caseing" piece is different, but something must be. Maybe whoever rebuilt it turned some thickness off of the piston?

The original plates (and those from my spare transmission are .060 thick, and like the new ones, the spline teeth are .034 thick. The bronze "facing" is only about .015 thick on each side, but has a definite, machined (or cast) spiral groove cut into it, with what look like an after thought tic-tac-toe pattern (#) hand ground into them. Imagine the # lines drawn equal to the outer diamiter of the plate, and where they cross the plate is where the ground grooves are. (see image link) The new plates have a much thicker "facing" coating.

The new plates (.090") have radial grooves in the facing. When I dis assembled my #1 clutch, I actually found 4 of the .060" spiral plates and one .090" radial plate. All of the steel plates that worked against the spirals had a spiral wavey wear pattern on them, and the ones that were against the radial plate were just a few thousandths thinner, but nice and flat and even. Clutches #2 and #3 are barely worn. I don't know why this is. The machine had a stop pin in the speed selector that only let it go up to speed 6.

The part number for the .090" plate that I bought is C0NN7B164B. I have no part numbers for the other pieces.

I will take the numbers you gave me and see what the Ford dealer comes up with.

Of all of the "original" spiral .060" plates I have (6 packs worth) none of them measure significantly less than .060". A few look a little "less good" than the majority, so I could pick and choose. For some reason, it seems that the steel plates wear more than the bronze ones. From looking at the wear on other parts, my spare unit had fewer hours on it, but most of the rotating parts were ruined by rust. Oddly enough, the bores for the servos are in much better shape on the spare, so I am going to use it's case for the rebuild.

Thank you again,

Dave

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Sam Mills

12-07-2000 09:50:46




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: 4000 S-O-S clutch puzzle in reply to David Tiefenbrunn, 12-06-2000 20:47:08  
Dave; Got some additional info as I have some new plates. The plate PBB77519A, (internal spline-Bronze) is .062" thick and 5.840 outside dia. The PBB77518A, (external spline, dished steel) is .070" thick and 4.470" inside dia. These plates are used as 5 each in #1. 2 and 3 clutch in the original transmmission, but only in #2 and 3 clutch in the later transmission. I wonder if your "spare" trans. is the original type and your operating unit is of the later design. If so; I dont think you can interchange the casings. Bern could clarify this. I also have a spare trans. The casting number on both units is 312259. Mine are the original design.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
David Tiefenbrunn

12-07-2000 20:02:28




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: 4000 S-O-S clutch puzzle in reply to Sam Mills, 12-07-2000 09:50:46  
That may be why I have only found the thick plates in the #1 clutch... (now that I stop and think about it) Maybe they upgraded the #1 with the thicker plates because it wears more than the #2 & #3? At least that is what happened in my transmission.

Both of my transmissions have the casting / part number C3NN-7006-B

It might be interesting to see if the upgrade to thicker plates would work. (I know, something else might not fit, making it NG)

Thank you,
Dave

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Bern

12-06-2000 21:33:58




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: 4000 S-O-S clutch puzzle in reply to David Tiefenbrunn, 12-06-2000 20:47:08  
Dave, I think your dealer ordered parts for a newer style 4000 (3 cyl engine) rather than the old style 4 cyl engine 4000. I was under the impression you had an older style trans, and when you told me there was 5 sets of plates per pack, that pretty much confirmed it for me. The part # you gave is indeed for the newer transmissions. I think that's the problem right there.

Nice picture. I'm assuming the one on the left is an original. Looks good enough to reuse to me.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
David Tiefenbrunn

12-07-2000 19:44:42




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: 4000 S-O-S clutch puzzle in reply to Bern, 12-06-2000 21:33:58  
I ordered one of the PBB77519A plates today. At least I will have a good reference, and see if they changed the groove pattern.

It makes sense now, the newer version and all. I did notice many minor variations while looking through all of the parts at the used parts place.

Yes, the plate on the left is the original, and I think I have enough of them in good shape.

Thank you,

Dave

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy