Brian Thanks. I have seen those figures quoted before. I have also seen offical FoMoCo documents (not mine, belongs to a collector in Albury NSW) that quotes the FSM as 53.9hp. The engine did change in specs from the FPM to the late 62FSM. Not only the injection systems, but the camshafts and cylinder head ports. I think the correct figures are, 1. FPM and 61/62FSM 51.8(52) 2. FSM Minimec pump, 53.9 (54) The 60hp claim is a verbal from a New Holland dealer. Can't be verified, but I can't see why Ford would bother adopting a new fuel injection system for a tractor and truck engine that would not give any benefit when they knew there was only going to be two more years production. Also, I still give the 60hp claim some merit as a 2hp increase is not realy worth while persuing either, I just want more evidence. The engine was extensivly modified when the "D" Series trucks replaced the Thames Trader range and the engine was not used in tractors with the introduction of the world range. Like I said in my post above, it is confusing and there seems to me to be a lot of contradictory evidence. Why was Ford so coy about the HP figure on these tractors? I have parts lists, service leters and operators manuals for all of these tractors as well as the trucks. The truck hp figures are easily available but not the tractors. BTW, the 330CID six cylinder is rated at 100hp in trucks and 86hp as the marine/industrial version. The four cylinder truck petrol (gasolene) is rated at 72 and the six at 115, both at 3200RPM. The petrols only have a 95mm bore. We are toying with bulding a 330 CID six cyl petrol /gas engine using TVO pistons and sleaves and puting it in a early E1A Major for the tractor pulls ( I have a number of Thame Trader Trucks, petrol and diesel 7.5 tonners in my collection). Any coments from anyone? Regards Steven
|