|
The only comment I'd add is that the biggest drawback to the 8N is the lack of live power. Once you've baled hay with a live P-T-O it's really hard to not have it. But bottom line is that you can do it. Larry
: : : : I have a 10 acre place which I have cut and baled every year. When all is said and done it costs me about $900. (I sell most of the hay so I come out ahead). I currently own a '52 8N and have a 501 sickle bar mower. I've been beating around the idea of looking for a baler and rake to do the job myself. The problem is I know nothing (but very willing to learn) about balers. I've always heard they are tempremental and hard to keep working properly. Is this something I should be considering or not??? If yes, any suggestions on baler and rake types would be appreciated. Should I only be considering balers with gas engines or can my 8N handle powering with the PTO? Any advice would be appreciated. : : Balers are no harder to operate and maintain than your 8N. As far as whether your 8N can handle the baler, I would worry more about the weight of the baler than the gas engine or a PTO. If your lots consist of steep hills the baler will push your 8N down the hill with little or no control. If your hay lots are on level ground, the 8N should do the trick. If you can, get a PTO driven baler. It's one less engine you have to keep running and maintain. I have a John Deere 14T that I bought used 10 years ago. Other than grease and a few shear pins I've had no problems with it. Good luck. : : I agree completely with previous notes. A 14-t or 24-T JD baler will make good bales behind an 8N. A New Holland or Massey baler of the same vintage with a fair amount of wear on them will make poor bales, if they can tie any. I still use a 14-T behind a 5000 Ford and can produce upwards of 300 per hour for pickup with a New Holland automatic wagon. Just expect low gear with the 8N and you'll do just fine.
| 
