Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo Auction Link (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

John Deere Tractors Discussion Forum
:

A camera for posting pictures

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
36 A

11-30-2003 19:29:04




Report to Moderator

Im woundering what kind of cameras you guys are using or should i get a scanner.Need to have some ideas to put on my santa list.I would like to get some pic of my 47 GM im restoring on here .




[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
JD Guy in NE.

12-01-2003 15:01:02




Report to Moderator
 Re: A camera for posting pictures in reply to 36 A, 11-30-2003 19:29:04  
third party image

..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .OK Tractor Boy, top this pic with your scanner!

..I have both types of cameras, a Pentax 35mm and an Olympus C-3000 (the above pic was taken with a digi-camera), and digital is by far a better choice for posting on the internet & for printing. First of all a digi-camera allows you to preview the pics you've just taken, this is probably one of the best features of the camera itself. You don't want to get back from the once a year tractor show you might attend and find out that some of your pics didn't turn out; there's no opportunity to go back & retake them.

Once you get the hang of it it's easy to download your pics from your camera if you have a USB connection to the PC (there are factors here too like what type of operating system are you using; WIN95 you can have problems, WIN98 & 98SE are ok, WinXP works error free for me). Most of them nowadays are USB, but some of the older models still use the slower parallel port connection; DO NOT BUY A CAMERA WITH THIS FEATURE IF YOU CAN AVOID IT!

One of the downsides of a digital camera is if you use the LCD viewfinder, which most people do, it does put a drain on your batteries, but if you get a good charger and an extra set of the re-chargable nickel-metal hyride batteries (which you should use instead of the AA throw-away type), you won't have to worry about your batteries running down. I've taken a lot of pics at tractor shows and have never had a problem with this type of battery running down.. just remember to turn your LCD viewer off when you are not taking pics and you shouldn't have a battery problem.

Amazon.com has a lot of digi-cameras to choose from and each models features are outlined there.. they also have reviews from people that have bought that paticular model and will usually tell you what they like & don't like about their camera choice, so you might want to check that out option too.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Allan

12-01-2003 03:13:43




Report to Moderator
 Re: A camera for posting pictures in reply to 36 A, 11-30-2003 19:29:04  
36A,

I guess once again that I am going to be the odd-man-out. Digital cameras are just like anything else in this world; you get exactly what you pay for.

I have been using a Canon Power-Shot A5 for quite a number of years now, and am just now in the process of shopping for a Power-Shot G5.

The price of compression is resolution, therefore, a high pixel rate (2meg, minimum)is needed at the onset.

The good news is that the prices have come down somewhat. These models now sell in the $500 to $700 range. They are not a throw-away item and are comparable in quality to the high end 35mm cameras and have a resolution rates of 5 megs with a combined 16X zoom.

It all depends on what you plan on using the camera for, I guess.

Regards,

Allan

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
MIKE HANLEY

11-30-2003 23:22:28




Report to Moderator
 Re: A camera for posting pictures in reply to 36 A, 11-30-2003 19:29:04  
Not am I not only high tect on the new tractors, I am not high tect on these computers. I use a 35MM cramra and make the trip to WAL MART 1 hour photo. Then I scan into the computer with a HEWLETT PACKERD 750 copyer, printer, scaner. We will not go to the computer camera because the kids like copies for there photo albems. To print a picture on photo paper with the printer from the computer is alot more expenceive then what I can have extra prints made at WAL MART. Last month I got hit my "THE WORM" and had to totaly crash the computer and start all over again as if it was day one. I lost everthing. But I still had the 3X5's prints from WAL MART so I could scan the pictures back in. I have had about 50% luck putting pictures from the computer on to disc. I'll put the disc in with pictures on the disc and the computer will say no files found and lock up the computer. Out of about 20 disc's that I had pictures on I can see pictures on about 10 of the disc's . The rest I threw away. I sent out a lot of pictures on E-Mails of pictures that were taken 10, 20, 30 years ago. No thanks but for me I want a hard copy in my hand and WAL MART is still cheaper for a hard copy.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
720Deere

12-01-2003 05:07:25




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: A camera for posting pictures in reply to MIKE HANLEY, 11-30-2003 23:22:28  
I have found that with a digital camera you are able to take alot more pictures than you normally would with a 35 mm. I load all my pictures onto my hard drive, go online to WalMart and upload the pictures that I want prints of and in 3 to 5 days the prints are at my local WalMart. It only cost about $0.26 per picture and you designate how many of each you want. $0.26 each for pictures that you want is alot better than $5 for 3/4 of a roll that are useless!

On the disc backup, are you using floppy disc or cd-rom? I back everything up to CD-R and have no problems at all. Depending on resolution, etc. I can store 500 to 600 pictures on a CD.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
MIKE HANLEY

12-01-2003 06:00:38




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: A camera for posting pictures in reply to 720Deere, 12-01-2003 05:07:25  
Yep been using the CD-R disc's. Had the most trouble with MAXELL brand disc's. The printer uses hp inkjet 15 and hp injet 78 and with that and the price of hp premium glossy photo paper, I fugure it only pays to print 8x11 out of the computer that you are going to frame. As it is close to 75 cents to a buck a copy depending if you hit a sale. Used alot of those 8X11 in court. Then you also have the nev and the oridgnal 3x5 so if some lawyer tryies to claim the photo was doctored, you have the nev and the oridgnal as proof.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
daveo

11-30-2003 21:24:40




Report to Moderator
 Re: A camera for posting pictures in reply to 36 A, 11-30-2003 19:29:04  
third party image

Hiya,

I’m another Kodak user, mine is a DC3400. I bought it as a discount model when a newer camera model replaced it. If I were shopping again today I’d look for another orphaned model that has been replaced by a new model, think $avings! One comforting thing about buying from the major players in the digital camera game is the support for their product. If you suddenly need to buy a new computer, the reputable camera companies will still provide software to work with your older camera. Look at camera manufactures web sited for information on the camera you are considering.

I agree that any two mega pixel camera is more that adequate for web pictures and will also provided nice 8”X10” prints from a photo processor.

Storage media will vary from make to make but they accomplish the same task - holding your pictures until you download them. The more popular are Compact flash & Smart Media.

Happy Hunting!

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
F-I-T

11-30-2003 19:46:53




Report to Moderator
 Re: A camera for posting pictures in reply to 36 A, 11-30-2003 19:29:04  
36A:

Like Chuck, I bought a camera on eBay. It's a HP Photosmart 318, and it has an extra card in it so I can take near 2,000 lowest res pictures. The book says it's 2.31 megapixels. I think I got for $60-65 shipped. That's what I use to take all my pictures. I have a scanner, too, but I don't use it very often. I think a digital camera is the way to go, but as Chuck says, don't over buy.

FRank

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Tractorboy

11-30-2003 19:42:45




Report to Moderator
 Re: A camera for posting pictures in reply to 36 A, 11-30-2003 19:29:04  
third party image

You dont need to spend a lot . I use a 35 mil. Kodak or a cheap digital or someone sends me the pic over the puter . All works real good .You can scan them also .



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Tractorboy

11-30-2003 19:50:24




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: A camera for posting pictures in reply to Tractorboy, 11-30-2003 19:42:45  
third party image

this is taken with a 35 Mil. camera scanned in my puter



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
SamH

12-01-2003 04:42:51




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: A camera for posting pictures in reply to Tractorboy, 11-30-2003 19:50:24  
Gosh Tractorboy. I wouldn't want a camera like yours. I can't tell what color your tractor is and the muffler and back tires don't show up at all. Ha, ha.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
F-I-T

11-30-2003 19:48:19




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: A camera for posting pictures in reply to Tractorboy, 11-30-2003 19:42:45  
Tactorboy, yeah, but you're still having trouble getting those pictures posted!

Heheheheheheheheh.

Frank



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
F-I-T

01-09-2006 09:28:58




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: A camera for posting pictures in reply to F-I-T, 11-30-2003 19:48:19  
Test of multiple images.

third party image

third party image

third party image

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
ChuckW

11-30-2003 19:38:04




Report to Moderator
 Re: A camera for posting pictures in reply to 36 A, 11-30-2003 19:29:04  
I use a Kodak 3200 and buy them off ebay....they are a 1.0 pixel, simple to use and have a flash and are cheap about $50-60. One thing that I've learned after 12 years of digital camera use is not to over buy. I see folks that are computer illerate buying $1200 cameras much much overkill. 1 pixel is good enough for any tractor photo.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Steve Crum

11-30-2003 20:17:21




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: A camera for posting pictures in reply to ChuckW, 11-30-2003 19:38:04  
I also use a Kodak 3200. Real handy camera and not too rough on batteries. The kodak patch cord for it can be left plugged into a spare USB port on your computer for easy loading.
I think the docking feature came in the next generation of Kodaks but to keep costs down it isn't needed.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy