Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo Auction Link (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Ford 9N, 2N & 8N Discussion Forum
:

motor oil; detergent v non-detergent

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
Rob

05-25-2005 06:30:05




Report to Moderator

So you want the clean engine that modern detergent oil promises? Maybe not a good idea.
Using detergent oil in the N engine cause excessive wear of bearings and seals because it allows abrasive material to circulate and recirculate through the engine.
Early engines used straight engine oil (non-detergent; "ND") and material settled out of the oil to accumulate as sludge in the pan and passages. The sludge was manually removed when the engine was rebuilt. The N uses ND oil, filters only the oil to the governor, and the sludge is manually removed during rebuild.
Later engines were built to last so long between rebuilds that the sludge built-up to restrict oil flow. That problem was solved by adding detergents to the oil. Detergents (surfactants) keep the material in suspension so it can not settle out and accumulate to block passages. The material will then circulate and recirculate along with the oil over the bearings and against the seals.
That is a problem because the material is abrasive and causes unwelcome, excessive wear to the bearings and seals. That problem is solved by using a 100%, full-flow oil filter to remove the abrasive material before it circulates through the bearings and up against the seals. Using detergent oil requires the use of a 100%, full-flow oil filter to prevent excessive wear of bearings and seals.
The N does not have a 100%, full-flow oil filter so material suspended in detergent motor oil circulates and recirculates causing excessive wear of the bearings and seals.
If you want to use detergent oil you should change the oil very often to remove the suspended abrasives.
I think I"ll stay with ND oil and clean the sludge when I rebuild.

[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
I don't buy this argument

05-25-2005 10:03:06




Report to Moderator
 Re: motor oil; detergent v non-detergent in reply to Rob, 05-25-2005 06:30:05  
If an engine is running, those abrasive particles will be suspended in the oil regardless of detergents, because the oil is moving. Shut the engine off and they settle out. Detergent oil keeps them in suspension so the oil filter can do its job - why is this not a good thing? The 8N does have an oil filter, it's slower than a full flow filter, but it does filter the oil.

Maybe if someone was going too long between oil changes, ND oil would be preferable. Even then, you lose the buffers against acidity and moisture that protect the engine from wear.

Yeah there's two reasons that Henry Ford didn't specify detergent oil for the original 8Ns: first, detergent oil didn't exist back then, and secondly, H. Ford was a businessman, not an engineer, so his opinion would mean squat!

Here's what I know - I use Rotella 15w-40 in my 8N, changing it once a year. With the Rotella, my oil pressure never drops below 15-20 PSI, and the tractor starts in the winter. If I went to a single viscosity oil, I'd have problems starting in the winter, and oil pressure would be around 2-5 PSI in the summer. The first couple changes with Rotella I got lots of sludge out, but now the engine seems to be nice and clean inside and I can rest easier knowing that oil is likely getting everywhere it needs to be.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Rob

05-25-2005 11:01:30




Report to Moderator
 Re: motor oil; detergent v non-detergent in reply to I don't buy this argument, 05-25-2005 10:03:06  
I think it"s undisputed that detergent oil does a much better job of suspending material and that the material does settle out and form a sludge when using ND oil. I believe it settles out and accumulates in the passages when it"s running because the oil drains into the pan when it"s shut down.
Some filter is better than no filter (I think, but Bob says bypassing a filter means cleaner oil in one of his replys) but they went to full-filter when they went to detergent oil. They work together to remove the material while keeping it out of the bearings. That"s pretty easy to understand.
Henry didn"t specify the oil! I quote the 9N manual: "Engineers have made a careful study to determine what type of lubricant will most effectively combat friction and reduce heat in the various units. The recommendations listed in our lubricating charts are the result of long study and experience." Henry didn"t call that shot and I"m confident he didn"t sit down and write manual.
Detergent is not a corrosion inhibitors and ash is used to neutralize acid in crankcase oil. ND oil can and does contain both corrosion inhibitors and ash. I believe it"s ash anyway.
Amsoil states that "SL [latest API S-series class] oil may be used in any engine, unless the engine manu­facturer specifies a “non­detergent” oil." I assume that goes for earlier API S-series classes. My top post gave one big reason why an oil company would make that statement. Seals and gaskets are another reason with Amsoil stating that "[a]ll motor oils must be compatible with the various seal materials used in engines. Oil must not cause seals to shrink, crack, degrade or dis­solve. Ideally, oils should cause seals to expand or “swell” slightly to ensure continued proper sealing." Old-fashioned non-detergent oil will be compatible with the sealing materials used in the N engine.
If you want to use a multi-season oil and stay in spec you might go with S.A.E. 20W-20 where the "W" means "winter" performance and starts cold thinner and get heavier in the heat like other multivis ratings. That"s good from +10 to +90 degrees. If you can find it in ND.
I have no idea when detergent oil became available but I would not be surprised to find that it was available when these tractors were built. How do you know it wasn"t availble back then?

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Bob

05-25-2005 11:11:34




Report to Moderator
 Re: motor oil; detergent v non-detergent in reply to Rob, 05-25-2005 11:01:30  
Rob,

Please take time to read what I wrote. I DID NOT SAY to "bypass the filter".

I said "people install bypass filters IN ADDITION TO OEM full-flow filters on modern diesel light trucks.

As far as when detergent oil become COMMONLY USED, by the general public, it happened during my time on this earth, and I ain't THAT ancient!



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Rob

05-25-2005 11:19:04




Report to Moderator
 Re: motor oil; detergent v non-detergent in reply to Bob, 05-25-2005 11:11:34  
Now wait a minute. I did take time to read what you said. You said "[I]nteresting thing is, large diesel engines supplement the full-flow oil filter with a bypass unit to keep the oil cleaner."
I even thought about what you posted and asked you if you could explain how bypassing the filter keeps the oil cleaner because that goes right over my head.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Bob

05-25-2005 10:57:29




Report to Moderator
 Re: motor oil; detergent v non-detergent in reply to I don't buy this argument, 05-25-2005 10:03:06  
I use a lot of Rotella in my older stuff, too, as I keep it around for newer diesels. I figure if it is good enough for to be factory spec'd for a $15,000 to $25,000 diesel, and stand up under the stresses encountered there, my old "N" will thrive on it, too.

As far as detergent oil hurting cork gaskets, or rope seals, that's a bunch of hooey!

People certainly are free to do what they want, so if modern oil scares you, why not give up your computer, the 'net, your modern automatic transmission, fuel injected car, modern medicine and wonder drugs, and any other modern IMPROVEMENTS and live back in the era of 1939????

(Of course, with some of the developments in the prescription drug area lately, giving up a lot of them might not be a bad idea!)

Enough ranting! Gotta go to work!

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Rob

05-25-2005 08:33:29




Report to Moderator
 Modern motor oils in reply to Rob, 05-25-2005 06:30:05  
Other than the suspended abrasives in detergent oils and the added cost of additives, an issue with using motor oils chocked full of additives is with the gaskets and seals used on the N.
Some of the additives are not compatible with the corks gaskets and rope seals. As for synthetics, at least some oil companies expressly state that their synthetic oil is not recommended for the older engines because of the gasket and seal issues. The N does a better job holding the straight ND oil than it does holding the stuff full of additives. It might be that the gaskets and seals just can"t hold the new stuff because it"s more slippery or that the some additives in the new stuff actually damage the cork or rope. I really don"t know.
It might be that if you can handle an increased likelihood of leaks that the benefits of the additives make it worth while.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
cargocult

05-25-2005 07:57:12




Report to Moderator
 Re: motor oil; detergent v non-detergent in reply to Rob, 05-25-2005 06:30:05  
If Henry Ford had wanted us to use the newfangled Detergent Oils in his nice machines, he'd have specified it! Use ONLY non-detergent oils of the proper viscosity for the application! Preferably single-viscosity! That way, your tractor will last {almost} forever! New=BAD Old=Good! (Most of the time)



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Rob

05-25-2005 08:06:30




Report to Moderator
 Re: motor oil; detergent v non-detergent in reply to cargocult , 05-25-2005 07:57:12  
I agree that if the detergent oil was the better lube then Ford would have not have specified ND. Seems obvious to me.
I posted to help folks understand how and why the ND oil was specified and how using detergent oil changes matters.
I don"t really care what folks use in their crankcase but I do see a lot of posts asking about the choice and see few replys that give reasons other than sludge builds up using ND oil. Seems the sludge build up can be a good thing. I find that interesting, others don"t seem to think so.
Either way, it"s a valid topic of discussion on this here discussion board.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Bob

05-25-2005 09:42:24




Report to Moderator
 Re: motor oil; detergent v non-detergent in reply to Rob, 05-25-2005 08:06:30  
Why did Ford specify ND oil, well for one reason, at least through most of the "N"'s production years, detergent oil would have been YEARS (decades?) away from availability, at least to the general public!



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Rob

05-25-2005 11:04:39




Report to Moderator
 Re: motor oil; detergent v non-detergent in reply to Bob, 05-25-2005 09:42:24  
Nevertheless, the problem with detergent oil is that it suspends abrasives so it can be delivered to a full-flow filter which is a reason to not use that oil in a no-filter or partial-filter engine.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Dan

05-25-2005 07:30:50




Report to Moderator
 Re: motor oil; detergent v non-detergent in reply to Rob, 05-25-2005 06:30:05  
Rob - not to nit pick - but my NAA is a N Series tractor and it does have a full-flow oil filtration system...

:)

Dan



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Rob

05-25-2005 07:40:43




Report to Moderator
 Re: motor oil; detergent v non-detergent in reply to Dan, 05-25-2005 07:30:50  
Well that"s nice but this is the "9N, 2N, and 8N discussion board." I don"t normally feel a need to address other models.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Dan

05-25-2005 07:59:29




Report to Moderator
 Re: motor oil; detergent v non-detergent in reply to Rob, 05-25-2005 07:40:43  
While you are correct that this is the 9N/2N/8N Discussion Board - NAAs are discussed in greater length here than in any other board. According to that logic - you could just state "Ford tractors do not have full-flow oil systems" and be acurate. The point of my previous post was to ensure those newer to the N Series tractors were not misinformed - and not to flame you. That is why the smiley face was there.

Dan

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
souNdguy

05-25-2005 06:54:57




Report to Moderator
 Re: motor oil; detergent v non-detergent in reply to Rob, 05-25-2005 06:30:05  
It's generally accepted that if you keep your breather clean, and change the oil on a regular interval, plus the partial flow filter.. that you are doing ok. Even at partial flow.. the oil does get filtered.. just takes it longer..

On a no-filter system I'd deffinately use ND oil.. like lawnmowers and compressors.. etc..

Soundguy



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Rob

05-25-2005 07:14:40




Report to Moderator
 Re: motor oil; detergent v non-detergent in reply to souNdguy, 05-25-2005 06:54:57  
The material is produced with each piston stroke and only 85% of that material can be removed before it"s recirculated, etc so all the abrasive can"t be removed until the oil is changed.

But it is your engine and you can use what you want for what ever reason you want. Sometimes it is good to know more about it then what is "generally accepted."

Besides, ND is cheaper than detergent oil. Near 15% cheaper. I don"t want to pay for additives that actually cause excessive wear regardless of what others use.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Dean

05-25-2005 07:38:46




Report to Moderator
 Re: motor oil; detergent v non-detergent in reply to Rob, 05-25-2005 07:14:40  
Interesting debate that has been largely resolved by about 50 years of experience.

1. Oil cost is relatively insignificant to the issue. That said, detergent oils are usually less expensive than ND oils because major brands of detergent oils are frequently found at sale prices at major retailers whereas ND oils, if available, are rarely discounted. Additionally, as detergent oils are retailed in much higher volumes than ND oils, the associated economies of scale usually result in lower prices for the detergent oils.

2. Most "full-flow" oil filters routinely bypass a significant percentage of the oil, especially when cold and even at operating temperature.

I am convinced that the use of detergent oils in a "clean" N engine is the better practice despite the partial-flow oil filter system. Of course, such practice would not be recommended in any engine that has not been thoroughly cleaned during a major overhaul.

Dean

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Rob

05-25-2005 07:56:27




Report to Moderator
 Re: motor oil; detergent v non-detergent in reply to Dean, 05-25-2005 07:38:46  
I don"t know there is any debate to be resolved. You can use what you want and most guys can"t see any difference with detergent oil. Only guys that might notice a difference in rebuild hours are those still using old Ford stationary engines running day-in/day-out. ND or detergent, my rebuilds will out last me, with any luck anyway.
I can buy ND oil under $1/qt. everyday price. Maybe I could do better shopping sales, dunno. I suppose I could do better buying bulk on sale too.
But none of that changes the fact that detergent oil keeps the abrasives in suspension to be circulated through the bearings and against the seals.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Dean

05-25-2005 13:14:14




Report to Moderator
 Re: motor oil; detergent v non-detergent in reply to Rob, 05-25-2005 07:56:27  
This has been a very interesting thread. Unfortunately work responsibilities have prevented from becomming as involved as I would have liked. A final thought:

While it is true that the dispersants in "detergent" oil are added in order to more effectively keep particulate contamination in suspension so that the modern "full-flow" oil filters, which are, in reality, not really full-flow," can remove more such contamination more quickly; it does not follow that particulate contamination will not be found in the ND oil in a running engine whether equipped with a full-flow oil filtering system or otherwise. Granted, "detergent" oils will more effectively keep such contamination in suspension and for a longer time. I have changed the ND oil in my share of cars with both partial and full flow oil filters (or no oil filter at all), and I can attest that the used oil that comes out will have contain particulate contaminantion.

Dean

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Rob

05-25-2005 13:22:52




Report to Moderator
 Re: motor oil; detergent v non-detergent in reply to Dean, 05-25-2005 13:14:14  
Glad you like the thread, I"ve learn plenty with it. You mentioned "dispersants" so here"s some FYI stuff.

Detergents

In the same way that some chemical compounds are used to prevent engine rust and corrosion, other chem­icals are added to motor oil to help prevent combustion by-products from forming harmful sludge or varnish deposits. Detergents are added to motor oil because combustion causes carbon build-up and deposit forma­tion on the pistons, rings, valves and cylinder walls. Carbon and deposits affect engine temperature, oil circula­tion, engine performance and fuel effi­ciency. Detergent additives clean these by-products from the oil. Some com­bustion by-products slip past the piston rings and end up in the motor oil, which can clog the engine’s oil channels.

Dispersants

While detergents help minimize the amount of combustion by-products, dispersant additives keep those by­products suspended in a form so fine they minimize deposits. They keep the oil in the engine clean while they prevent the build-up of carbon or deposits from burned and unburned fuel and even from the oil itself. Eventually, these suspended particles are removed by the oil filter.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Bob

05-25-2005 07:35:13




Report to Moderator
 Re: motor oil; detergent v non-detergent in reply to Rob, 05-25-2005 07:14:40  
Interesting thing is, large diesel engines supplement the full-flow oil filter with a bypass unit to keep the oil cleaner. There are a number of aftermarket outfits offering add-on bypass filter kits for diesel pickups to keep the oil cleaner and extend oil life between changes. What they are removing is the soot and stuff that gets by the piston rings, the same as you are talking about. Bottom line, the oil filter system on an "N" does a darn good job for it's age! (When the "N"'s first came out, and for years after that, many cars and trucks had NO oil filter.)

I have run detergent oil in all my engines, about FOREVER, and have had NO unusual wear or overhauls neded, and this is in a real farm working environment.

So, the bottom line is, run what you're confortable with but don't scare folks needlessly about detergent oil!

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Rob

05-25-2005 07:47:11




Report to Moderator
 Re: motor oil; detergent v non-detergent in reply to Bob, 05-25-2005 07:35:13  
Can you explain how bypassing the filter keeps the oil cleaner? That went right over my head.

Scare? I guess that"s one way to look at it.

I don"t know how many hours are lost by using detergent oil. It might be 30-minutes. But using detergent oil does circulate abrasives. If it"s a huge deal is another question.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Bob

05-25-2005 09:36:23




Report to Moderator
 Re: motor oil; detergent v non-detergent in reply to Rob, 05-25-2005 07:47:11  
What I said was that ag, industrial, over-the-road and contruction diesel engines use a bypass filter setup similar to the system used on the "N"'s to get the oil CLEANER than the OEM full-flow filter does. (In addition to a full-flow filter.) Many people are retro-fitting bypass systems to diesel light trucks, also.

They tap into the main oiling system, and allow a controlled amount of oil to pass through the added bypass filter, which is the same way the "N"'s are set up.

Here's a link to a site with the bypass filter retro-fit kits, which are reputed to remove smaller wear-causing particles than a full-flow filter does.

So, for the samll wear-causing particles you are worrying about, there's nothing wrong with a bypass filter.

Even with ND oil, you're going to have most of the wear-causing particles circulating around with the oil until filtered out, but, of course, during shut-down theywill settle out as sludge.

I have no opinion on Amsoil products, for or against. There are many other bypass filter kits out there, this was simply the first site I found.

They are talking about only 10% of the oil flow going through the bypass filter, and still cleaning up the oil beyond what the OEM full-flow filter will do.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Rob

05-25-2005 15:04:32




Report to Moderator
 Re: motor oil; detergent v non-detergent in reply to Bob, 05-25-2005 09:36:23  
Bob....
That is a bypass to provide additional filtering of particles the standard filter can"t remove.
That is not like the N were the oil bypass allows unfiltered oil.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Dell (WA)

05-25-2005 09:31:43




Report to Moderator
 Re: motor oil; detergent v non-detergent in reply to Rob, 05-25-2005 07:47:11  
Rob..... ...yer scaring the un-informed about oil.

Biggest cause of engine oil based wear is ACID. Which is a natural by-product of combustion process. Detergent based engine oils and especially modern multi-weight oils have both acid neutralizers and partical suppension additives.

Yeah, the 15% bypass filter situation is a problem but is addressed by using a QUALITY oilfilter like NAPA gold 1010. DO NOT USE FRAM oilfilters, they have been proven by independent testing laboratorys as inefficent at filtering particals. (measured in microns)

Even the Ford OWNERS MANUAL recommends ANNUAL or 100hrs of operation engine OIL CHANGE with original spec 30wt oil. Frequent oil changes gitts ridd of contaminants.

I change my 8N's oil every fall and use Valvoline 20-50wt. Multi-weight oil starts out cold at the lower number and heat effects additives giving it the effect of thicker oil. After 5hrs of brushhoggin' my idle oil pressure is still 30psi which is good enuff for me.

I have always used Valvoline after working as a BMW dealer mechanic. I saw what fussy BMW owners required "specialist" oils can do BMW engines. Not purddy. I can eat off the insides my 1969 BMW 2002 cast alminum OHC valve cover and it has over 385k miles on it.

Your engine, yer oil; use and change that makes you happy..... .....respectfully, Dell the oily

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Rob

05-25-2005 10:06:47




Report to Moderator
 Re: motor oil; detergent v non-detergent in reply to Dell (WA), 05-25-2005 09:31:43  
Acid is an excellent point. Take it one step more and say that leaving wet, acidic oil in there all winter without running the engine will undo all efforts to keep the engine lubed. Leaving that acidic water on one spot on the bearing all winter or any several months will surely pit and otherwise go a ways to screw up a bearing. Just turning the crank a couple revolutions every month or so can do a world of wonderful good things at least move the acid to another spot on the bearing minimizing the pit.
That goes for any bearing like the wheel bearings on that trailer out in the weeds. Leave it set long enough and that wheel bearing will shoot craps on the next road trip because of rust and pitting.
My post was not meant to "scare" anyone. I see people asking if they should use ND or not and there are reasons to use ND besides cheap. Now my tbird uses detergent oil going on 288k with no rebuild so that"s the way to go there but I remember more than a few Fram filters..... ...oh well..

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
cjm

05-25-2005 09:43:37




Report to Moderator
 Re: motor oil; detergent v non-detergent in reply to Dell (WA), 05-25-2005 09:31:43  
what oil would you guys recommend in hot south texas weather? sometimes temps reach near 100 degrees in summer. and winter temp are always above freezing. usually in the 60's and 70's.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Rob

05-25-2005 10:15:12




Report to Moderator
 Re: motor oil; detergent v non-detergent in reply to cjm, 05-25-2005 09:43:37  
post above says "about" should read "above" 90.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Rob

05-25-2005 10:13:27




Report to Moderator
 Re: motor oil; detergent v non-detergent in reply to cjm, 05-25-2005 09:43:37  
Temps about 90 use S.A.E. 30.
Temps from +32 to 90 use S.A.E. 20.

So says the operator"s manual.

If your engine is worn you might want to go heavier weight to keep up the oil pressure. Either that or rebuild to get the oil pressure up.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
sawmill

05-25-2005 13:48:15




Report to Moderator
 Re: motor oil; detergent v non-detergent in reply to Rob, 05-25-2005 10:13:27  
I have a 9n that hasn't seen an overhaul in a long time, if ever, and I notice that when it gets hot it smokes more and uses more oil with multi weight oil. Straight 30 weight ND oil smokes less and lasts longer. Does this mean anything to someone with a sound rebuilt engine? I don't know!
Rick



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Stoneman

05-25-2005 18:18:35




Report to Moderator
 Re: motor oil; detergent v non-detergent in reply to sawmill, 05-25-2005 13:48:15  
Detergent oil came into use around 1950-52. We always used Esso oil in our N. After one oil change it started to smoke and the oil rep said, "oh now our oil now has a detergent in it." After one or two oil changes, the smoke cleared up and it ran like a champ. I use synthetic oil in everything except my N which has 15w-40 conventional oil in it. I use synthetic even in my lawn equipment.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy