"My main reason for wanting hydraulics is to get both pedals on the same side of the tractor." I understand - that was my suggestion - two brake pedals mounted in the vicinity of the right foot peg and a single clutch pedal on the left foot peg. "I figure that running brake lines is easier that making a linkage that gets around the hinney." A simple turnbuckle linkage similar to the OEM clutch linkage seems pretty simple. Much more so than re-engineering the backplate on the brakes! Run linkage rods down each side of the tranny to the existing brake shafts. Mount a short lever arm to each of them to connect the linkage. Use a short shaft crosswise over the top of the tranny to link one brake pedal on the right side to the brake linkage on the left side. You can probably use the tranny cover bolts to mount support brackets. That's pretty much how my Kubota is designed except the crossover shaft goes under the tranny and is supported by the running board brackets. "I would also like to reduce the amount of input pressure required to brake the old girl." Again - understood. The existing drums and linings are quite substantial and capable of generating a lot of braking force. As I said the main problem with all of the N's is not so much the mechanical advantage of the mechanism but rather the direction (angle) in which the operator has to apply pressure. Straight down just doesn't let you use your leg strength advantageously. The mechanical advantage provided by the simple lever and pin linkage on my Kubota is quite substantial - far in excess of that provided by the OEM pedals on the 9N. I've operated some pretty good sized machines that had very good brakes without the benefit of hydraulics. TOH
|