Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo Auction Link (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Discussion Forum
:

Compression Testing Questions

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
motorv8N

10-15-2007 08:14:03




Report to Moderator

...now say THAT five times fast...third party image

ahem..

A couple of questions regarding compression testing.

1. I don't hear too much talk about leak-down testing. Is that not as much of a concern versus just cranking compression when considering buying?

2. Anyone have the patience to give chapter and verse on exactly how each kind of test is accomplished on an 8N (both cranking and leak-down) including what to do with the coil and how to ground it properly (for both 6 volt pos ground and 12 vold neg ground systems). For instance, can you jsut remove all connections to the coil or must it be allowed to fire to ground?

3. Do I need to worry about the thread size of the plug bores or will most compression testers come with adaptors?

4. Finally, do I need an elbow to get the tester between the tank and head or is that just a nice ta have?

Thanks for the ongoing great source of info for us noobs!

[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
gahorN

10-18-2007 07:47:56




Report to Moderator
 Re: Compression Testing Questions in reply to motorv8N, 10-15-2007 08:14:03  
Cont'd:
And that is also why multiple ground-electrode spark plugs are marginally superior to standard spark plugs. The ground-electrode experiences the majority of erosion-wear due to the departure of electrons and thereby loss of material. Multiple ground electrode plugs have a marginal advantage in that regard. (Practically speaking they are a waste of money, of course.)



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
JMOR

10-18-2007 09:40:44




Report to Moderator
 Re: Compression Testing Questions in reply to gahorN, 10-18-2007 07:47:56  
You are confusing conduction thru a metal conductor with the movement of electrons from one metal part across an air gap to another metal part. Not at all related. Think about a vacuum tube. The purpose of the heater filament is to heat the cathode (negative source point for the electrons) to increase electron thermal energy/mobility so that they will more easily depart as they are attracted to the Positive plate of the tube. It is physics. A very good analogy is the heating of water such that molecules can leave the liquid body, evaporation.

The next point of confusion: The high voltage provided by the secondary circuit of the coil has absolutely nothing to do with whether the battery is POS or NEG ground. That is determined by the direction of current thru the primary of the coil and by the direction of the physical windings of the wire on the coil's core and the way the primary and secondary wires are connected. We can't change the last two items inside the sealed coil, but the manufacturer can. We can change the current direction by connecting BAT+ to coil + and BAT - to coil -, or BAT+ to coil - and BAT- to coil +, thus causing the High Voltage out to be either NEG or POS as we choose.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Ed in ON Canada

10-17-2007 13:24:58




Report to Moderator
 Re: Compression Testing Questions in reply to RP-40-9n, 10-15-2007 08:14:03  

JMOR said: (quoted from post at 18:07:24 10/16/07) Fine! What's the rational for 1/2 energy loss? where does it go? Just looking to understand the rational.

I'm always looking to learn.


My recollection is that the loss is more like 20 or 25%, and is due to the difference in energy required to make the spark jump from the center to side vs side to center electrodes.

More modern ignition systems can generate more energy, and so can afford to lose the efficiency of negative grounding.

At least that is how I am pretty sure I read it online here...

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Jerry/MT

10-15-2007 19:58:54




Report to Moderator
 Re: Compression Testing Questions in reply to motorv8N, 10-15-2007 08:14:03  
The proper way to conduct a compresson test is with the engine at operating temperature and the throttle full open and no choke and no aircleaner restriction. Removing the plugs makes it easier on the starter and doesn"t effect the results. When you can"t get it started to warm it up, you"ll have to do it cold and then you"ll have to expect lower compression pressures.

To run the test you merely connect the comression gauge to the appropriate spark plug hole and crank the engine until the pressure stops rising. Record the pressure. Repeat on all cylinders. If there are large variations (more than 10 psi)in compression, squirt a couple of ounces of motor oil in the cylinders and repeat the test. If the pressures increase, the rings are worn. If they don"t, the valves are leaking OR you may have a head gasket leak. This is especially true if the low pressures are on adjacent cylinders. But it"s not a sure thing. You can have a couple of burned balves on adjacent cylinders also.

The correct connection of the coil is that the primary wire to the distributor must be connected to the coil terminal with the same sign as the battery ground. So if you have a positve ground battery, the small wire to the distributor must be connected to the (+) terminal on the coil. Otherwise you"ll loose about half the spark energy.
HOWEVER, you don"t need to do anything to the coil to conduct a compression test. In a lot of cases, you don"t have to have the ignition switch on to run the starter.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
JMOR

10-16-2007 06:00:14




Report to Moderator
 Re: Compression Testing Questions in reply to Jerry/MT, 10-15-2007 19:58:54  
HALF?

HALF?

"you"ll loose about half the spark energy."

0.01

1%

typically 100:1 turns ratio



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Jerry/MT

10-16-2007 10:34:40




Report to Moderator
 Re: Compression Testing Questions in reply to JMOR, 10-16-2007 06:00:14  
What are you talking about? I"m refering to spark energy not voltage ratios or turn ratios.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
JMOR

10-16-2007 15:07:24




Report to Moderator
 Re: Compression Testing Questions in reply to Jerry/MT, 10-16-2007 10:34:40  
Fine! What's the rational for 1/2 energy loss? where does it go? Just looking to understand the rational.
I'm always looking to learn.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Jerry/MT

10-17-2007 09:05:34




Report to Moderator
 Re: Compression Testing Questions in reply to JMOR, 10-16-2007 15:07:24  
When the polarity on the plug is reversed the electron flow is from the ground electrode to the center electrode in stead of from the center electrode to the ground electrode. The ground electrode is cooler(the high heat transfer rate through the metal threaded fitting to the cylinder head) than the center electrode ( which is insulated by a ceramic insulator)and the electrons do not come off the cooler ground electrode as easily as they do off the hotter center electrode so the spark is weaker. The vehicle may run if the rest of the system is on the money but as the points wear the spark gets even weaker. This condition is exacerbated with cold weather.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
gahorN

10-18-2007 07:44:36




Report to Moderator
 Re: Compression Testing Questions in reply to Jerry/MT, 10-17-2007 09:05:34  

Jerry/MT said: (quoted from post at 09:05:34 10/17/07) When the polarity on the plug is reversed the electron flow is from the ground electrode to the center electrode in stead of from the center electrode to the ground electrode. The ground electrode is cooler(the high heat transfer rate through the metal threaded fitting to the cylinder head) than the center electrode ( which is insulated by a ceramic insulator)and the electrons do not come off the cooler ground electrode as easily as they do off the hotter center electrode so the spark is weaker. The vehicle may run if the rest of the system is on the money but as the points wear the spark gets even weaker. This condition is exacerbated with cold weather.


Don't know about the discussion about the loss of inductance power due to reversal.... but this part about the spark jumping from the center to the ground electrode being hotter than the reverse cannot be true.

Firstly, the electrons flow from negative to positive, and in the original system it was a positive ground system, but in 12V systems it becomes a negative ground system.
Cooler conductors should not offer greater resistance to "electrons coming off" than a hot conductor. Cooler items will usually have greater density and would actually improve electron flow. Supercooled circuits are actually developed for the purpose in some applications.

In the vast majority of systems worldwide the side/threaded electrode of a spark plug is the negative electrode and is the departure electrode for electric flow.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
JMOR

10-17-2007 09:49:02




Report to Moderator
 Re: Compression Testing Questions in reply to Jerry/MT, 10-17-2007 09:05:34  
I'm aware of that & totally agree with you on the topic of it being harder to initiate an arc with positive on center electrode.
My quarrel was on the following:

"The correct connection of the coil is that the primary wire to the distributor must be connected to the coil terminal with the same sign as the battery ground. So if you have a positve ground battery, the small wire to the distributor must be connected to the (+) terminal on the coil. Otherwise you"ll loose about half the spark energy.

"What are you talking about? I"m refering to spark energy not voltage ratios or turn ratios."

And I still say, not 1/2 energy lost.

No energy lost. Energy=1/2 x L x i x i.
L doesn't change with current direction nor does i.

Virtually all the front mounts converted to POS ground run around happy "reversed" anyway, because with the mechanical connections at square can coil, they can't be changed to obtain a neg HV output. So, for these thousands, this is purely academic.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Jerry/MT

10-17-2007 14:48:50




Report to Moderator
 Re: Compression Testing Questions in reply to JMOR, 10-17-2007 09:49:02  
But I does because there is essentially more resistance in the high tension circuit when you try to jump from the ground electrode to the center electrode.

I didn"t make this up, do some research and you"ll find this info in a lot of different resources (Motor Publications, etc).

And that is one of the problems with the front monts IF you change polarity. This forum is full of people have problems with front mounts. I don"t know how many are due to having the wrong polarity but there are a lot of folks having weak sparks with front mounts.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
JMOR

10-17-2007 15:34:34




Report to Moderator
 Re: Compression Testing Questions in reply to Jerry/MT, 10-17-2007 14:48:50  
The energy stored in the coil is that same regardless of polarity.

Because it is easier for the more highly mobile (because they are on a hotter surface)electrons on the center hotter electrode to jump to the side (cooler) electrode than the other way around, the voltage will have to rise higher to establish the arc.
So, yes there is a better & worse way. Reversed, it is harder to establish the arc, but the energy supplied/stored & released by the coil is the same.

You don't lose any energy, you just need a higher voltage to start the arc. That leaves you with a smaller safety margin. By all means hook it up right if you can.

I've read reams on the subject. The problem is that folks use terms loosely and misinformation is spread, misinterpreted and repeated. Pretty soon it becomes "fact?". Do you concern yourself with setting a lead acid battery on wet concrete or the damp earth? You would be surprised how many do.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Jerry/MT

10-17-2007 17:30:09




Report to Moderator
 Re: Compression Testing Questions in reply to JMOR, 10-17-2007 15:34:34  
I guess I don"t see that. I agree that the input power to the coil should always be the same because the primary circuit resistance is the same. The secondary power is limited by the "resistance" in the high tension circuit. My point is tht the bassackwards connection limits the energy in the spark so that the spark is a orangey low energy spark rather than the required fat, bluish-white spark that should occur. Heck you don"t have to hook the coil up backwards to have that effect. You can put high resistance in the circuit by opening the gap on the plug from say 0.025" to 0.040". For a 6 V coil, you probably have zero chance of firing that and if that"s true then power output of the high tension circuit is zero. You induce some high voltage in the high tension circuit but the current is zero so there is no I^2 x R in the high tension path.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
JMOR

10-17-2007 19:21:21




Report to Moderator
 Re: Compression Testing Questions in reply to Jerry/MT, 10-17-2007 17:30:09  
The stored energy in the coil WILL go somewhere. If you just disconnect the HV terminal from anything and listen, you will here a sound. That sound is an arc. Usually from the tower, past the insulating plastic to one of the other terminals, sometimes it is internal, breaking down the insulation between the windings of the coil wires themselves. The I^2 x L/2 energy is still there & being released. It is a bad thing to let a coil fire into an open circuit as I described above as it may damage the wire insulation internally to the point that such a weak insulation point becomes an easier path than the plugs 0.025 gap. Then you get to buy a new coil.
I guess you should just go on faith & believe whatever you want. It is just one of those things, kinda like fingernails on glass, that I hate to see something like "by reversing the current thru the coil, you lose half the energy" get propagated. I really don't know what else to say.

Today I received an e-mail that said, " how to be happy: Live like a dog, if you can't eat it or hump it, pi$$ on it and walk away". I probably should take that advice.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Jerry/MT

10-18-2007 07:31:53




Report to Moderator
 Re: Compression Testing Questions in reply to JMOR, 10-17-2007 19:21:21  
Well we can agree to disagree but I"ll try this one more time and then we can agree to disagree!

The secondary circuit in an ideal situation will only provide the same power as the input power to the primary side. For a 6 V circuit @ 4amps that"s 24 watts ideal. Now lets say that it takes 10000 V to bridge the spark gap and there is no reistance in the circuit. That means the that for this ideal system, the current in the spark gap is 24w/10000 V = 2.4 ma. Now lets put some resistance in the circuit and remember we still have an ideal coil. It still takes 10000 V to jump the gap.The coil responds and puts out 20KV but, but we still only have 10000V at the spark plug gap itself. Soooo 24w/20000 =1.2 ma. The spark energy is now 1/2 of what it was (1.2 x 10000 versus 2.4 X 10000) The rest of the energy is dissipated as heat in the circuit. In reality the coil has some loss so the situation is even worse.
Regarding the dead headed coil, I suppose you could have some small air gap at the coil tower/secondary lead for the case where the high tension circuit is open but it you have an infinite resitance in the high tension lead, you have no current flow and no power in theat circuit. No current, no heat to dissipate. Your primary circuit will still. Just because you induce a high voltage in a inductor soesn"t mean to induce current in the high tension circuit. You only have the potential for current flow. It like a dead headed pump, all kinds of pressure but no flow.
I"ll end this discourse and we can agree to disagree now.

Best regards,
Jerry

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
JMOR

10-18-2007 08:44:58




Report to Moderator
 Re: Compression Testing Questions in reply to Jerry/MT, 10-18-2007 07:31:53  
third party image

A MAJOR flaw. Energy does not equal Power!

Energy=Power x Time.

In your example, the 10,000 volt discharge will last twice as long as if it were 20,000 volt discharge. Hence, SAME Energy.

The coil also doesn't respond with 20, 000 volt output. The coil's output voltage will rise only to that voltage which is necessary to breakdown the air gap and establish an arc. After the initial breakdown & establishment of the arc, the voltage across the gap reduces even further because it requires less voltage to sustain an arc in the plasma created by the arc.
If you look at the HV waveform on an ignition oscilloscope, this is very evident.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Jerry/MT

10-18-2007 15:51:03




Report to Moderator
 Re: Compression Testing Questions in reply to JMOR, 10-18-2007 08:44:58  
I"ve decided to continue the discussion. What is the ordinate on your graph? it appears to be voltage? Energy is the integral of Pdt. If your graph"s ordinate is voltage then you have not integrated the correct data because Power= I x E What you need is a graph of I x E versus time and you need to integrate that over the proper time interval to get to energy. Your graphic argument is not correct.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
JMOR

10-18-2007 19:01:53




Report to Moderator
 Re: Compression Testing Questions in reply to Jerry/MT, 10-18-2007 15:51:03  
Hey if you want to address incorrect, take a look at this major pile, ...it has zero basis! Sounds like a politician responding.
Let's just insert some fictional resistance!
Let's just assume the coil produces 20, 000 volts, even though the gap breaks down at maybe 6,000?!

There are no facts here!

The secondary circuit in an ideal situation will only provide the same power as the input power to the primary side. For a 6 V circuit @ 4amps that"s 24 watts ideal. Now lets say that it takes 10000 V to bridge the spark gap and there is no reistance in the circuit. That means the that for this ideal system, the current in the spark gap is 24w/10000 V = 2.4 ma. Now lets put some resistance in the circuit and remember we still have an ideal coil. It still takes 10000 V to jump the gap.The coil responds and puts out 20KV but, but we still only have 10000V at the spark plug gap itself. Soooo 24w/20000 =1.2 ma. The spark energy is now 1/2 of what it was (1.2 x 10000 versus 2.4 X 10000) The rest of the energy is dissipated as heat in the circuit. In reality the coil has some loss so the situation is even worse.

Power, then energy, then strike off in any direction!
Where ever you go....you can't evade physics! The energy stored in the coil is 1/2 L x i^2 AND it is ALL released when the points open! I is NOT lost in space, not even 10% of it!

Some people, as you appear to be, don't want to learn, their minds are like concrete, all mixed up and permanently set.

Don't listen to me, just go to the library, read a physics book, an engineering 101 text, you'll learn something and maybe not spread misinformation in the future!

Yep, we do disagree!
If you can't put out accurate info, don't put out anything at all.
To remain silent, you may be thought a fool, open your mouth and remove all doubt.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Jerry/MT

10-18-2007 20:32:07




Report to Moderator
 Re: Compression Testing Questions in reply to JMOR, 10-18-2007 19:01:53  
Do you always lose your temper when you you can"t prove your point? You didn"t enter this discussion for any other reason than to tell me I was wrong. I have tried to address the salient points of this issue in a logical, straight forward, technical manner. I"m sorry that you are unable grasp these arguments that address the fact that the spark current is reduced by reversing the polarity of the dc electrical system with out changing the "polarity" of the coil. I won"t go away mad, I"ll just go away.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
JMOR

10-19-2007 06:33:29




Report to Moderator
 Re: Compression Testing Questions in reply to Jerry/MT, 10-18-2007 20:32:07  
Hey, I never made any 'attempt' to prove a point. Thats all been done many years ago & is well documented in the physics books of the world.
I set out to try and stop the spread of mis-information by you, as gently as possible, by offering well documented scientific facts.

No temper lost her, just frustration at my inability to communicate. If you will re-read the thread, you will see that I never called you "wrong" or even "incorrect" as you did me.

You clearly show your loose footing as you dance about like a prize fighter, with ever changing subject argument, for example:
1) you lose half the energy.
2) you lose power
3) output of high tension circuit is zero
4) insert resistance in circuit by opening gap (gap is not a resistance) (a resistance exists in the conducting plasma after arc is established)
5) then a baseless calculation of ma in secondary circuit tied to fictional resistance
6) spark current is reduced

The obvious trend here is to not directly address the question, but rather jump somewhere else.

From early on, I stated that "I was here to learn, where does 1/2 energy go?" That got a response of "the spark will be weaker", not an answer as to where did the 1/2 energy go.
So, I asked again & got "because there is essentially more resistance in the high tension circuit "....well we didn't insert a resistor or re-wind the coil with finer wire. So, still no answer as to where did 1/2 energy go? "I didn"t make this up.."

"I"m sorry that you are unable grasp these arguments that address the fact that the spark current is reduced by reversing the polarity of the dc electrical system with out changing the "polarity" of the coil.

"I didn"t make this up" isn't much of an argument to grasp. Nor is "But it does..".

"You didn"t enter this discussion for any other reason than to tell me I was wrong."

Well, I never did tell you that, but I'm still looking for ananswer as to where did half the energy go? And I'm still sticking with the physics & electronics text books in that the coil stores AND releases 1/2 L i^2 every time. If an arc is established, it is all released into that arc and if the gap is so large as to prohibit an arc (dielectric strengh so large-not resistance), then that energy which is still stored in the coil, is still all released. Released either through a breakdown of insulation within the coil, or if that insulation is so good as to prevent that arc, then released by causing an oscillating exchange between the inductance of the primary and the capacitor, until all the energy is dissipated in those elements plus the small amount that is always lost in the arc at the points as they open.

Now if you would stop spreading "reverse polarity of the coil causes loss of half the spark energy" and speak of the primary issue with reverse polarity, that being that it is harder to establish the arc due to electron emission from hot/cold metal, then we could stop this exchange and get on with better things AND I won't even call you wrong, not correct, or incorrect.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Jerry/MT

10-18-2007 15:30:24




Report to Moderator
 Re: Compression Testing Questions in reply to JMOR, 10-18-2007 08:44:58  
You have missed my point entirely. Lets just agree to disagree!



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Jerry/MT

10-18-2007 15:30:00




Report to Moderator
 Re: Compression Testing Questions in reply to JMOR, 10-18-2007 08:44:58  
You have missed my point entirely. Lets just agree to disagree!



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Hobo,NC

10-15-2007 18:15:29




Report to Moderator
 Re: Compression Testing Questions in reply to motorv8N, 10-15-2007 08:14:03  
I don't hear too much talk about leak-down testing. Is that not as much of a concern versus just cranking compression when considering buying?

If you have acceptable compression then theirs no need for a leak down test in most cases, never hurts to do a leak down test tho, it will tell ya more than a compression test.

On a compression test the first few hits on the gauge tell ya the ability of the rings to seal, the next 2 to 3 tell ya the ability of the valves to seal. Lets just say most of the time. When you run up on stuck/carbon-ed up rings then it may not B possible to bring up the compression so that's why you will hear to add oil to the cylinder and repeat. If oil brings the compression up then its a tell tell sign their is a ring problem. Added oil will have very little effect on valve seal. In this case you would STOP and go about possible ways to unstick the rings, if that does not help its time to open it up and go deep. A leak down test would confirm if the lost leakage was the rings.

It would take 2 much time for me to write it up step by step. First do a compression test if it shows a problem are low numbers move on to a leakage test, if still a problem go to a run'n compression test. Most folks don't go threw the steps to nail were the problem lies B-4 they tear into a engine. I read professional sites and even their compression/leak down/ vacuum test have become a lost art. Dunno but B-4 I go into a engine I like to know which cylinder is in question even if its a head gasket I like to know what cylinder to focus on.

Their is some tips on my web site if you can cipher threw it. Like Jethro Bodean I wanted to B a Brain surgeon / astronaut/ movie producer / 00 spy but on a allowance of 50 cents a week found out rite fast I would have to B a goober.

Third Party Image

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Jeff-oh

10-15-2007 14:40:59




Report to Moderator
 Re: Compression Testing Questions in reply to motorv8N, 10-15-2007 08:14:03  
I have a rubber boot on the end of my tester. No threads. Just hold it to the plug hole and crank.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
JMOR

10-15-2007 12:26:50




Report to Moderator
 Re: Compression Testing Questions in reply to motorv8N, 10-15-2007 08:14:03  
Leakdown testing is increasingly difficult as the number of cylinders decrease, 8,6,4,1. Unless you can get the cylinder under test at EXACTLY, EXACTLY, EXACTLY TDC compression stroke you will need a means of holding the crankshaft it that position as you apply compressed air (you need compressed air source, too). In gear isn't good enough....it will roll your tractor. You of course need a Leakdown tester. I've performed this on several engines and at this point, I probably wouldn't speed all the time required to do it vs compression test. After compression test shows too low on one cylinder, you can still help isolate I-valve, E-valve, rings,head gasket, etc. by introducing compressed air into that cylinder without a Leakdown tester, just a simple air hose to spark plug adapter (weld 1/4NPT nipple to old spark plug). My 2 cents worth & more!

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Bruce (VA)

10-15-2007 09:06:24




Report to Moderator
 Re: Compression Testing Questions in reply to motorv8N, 10-15-2007 08:14:03  
1. I'm not conversant on the specs for a leak down compression test, so I'll pass on that.

2. The only compression tests I'm familiar with on an N are wet & dry tests. Both call for a hot engine, choke & carb open, all 4 plugs removed. So, leaving the key off would address your coil question.

3. The threads in the head are 14mm straight threads. My compression gauge came w/ two adapters & one of them fit the N head.

4. The elbow is not required but sure is nice. It is not a standard plumbing item, so take your gauge w/ you to the hardware store.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Tom in Iowa City

10-15-2007 11:56:28




Report to Moderator
 Re: Compression Testing Questions in reply to Bruce (VA), 10-15-2007 09:06:24  
Bruce, why would the threads in the head be metric when the heads were made by Ford in America in the 30s, 40s and 50s?



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
JMOR

10-15-2007 12:13:48




Report to Moderator
 Re: Compression Testing Questions in reply to Tom in Iowa City, 10-15-2007 11:56:28  
Not Bruce, but..... .....

Link



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Tom in Iowa City

10-15-2007 13:08:13




Report to Moderator
 Re: Compression Testing Questions in reply to JMOR, 10-15-2007 12:13:48  
I think I am missing something. I read the link...but what about the metric threads?



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
JMOR

10-15-2007 14:23:46




Report to Moderator
 Re: Compression Testing Questions in reply to Tom in Iowa City, 10-15-2007 13:08:13  
What I was getting at, was that spark plugs were invented in Europe and even Champion originated in Europe, so when America got around to making IC engines, they PROBABLY used whatever plugs were currently being manufactured. At some point, they at least used inch wrench sizes on the plugs, but continued the metric thread sizes.
My guess. And only a WAG!



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Bob

10-15-2007 14:13:25




Report to Moderator
 Re: Compression Testing Questions in reply to Tom in Iowa City, 10-15-2007 13:08:13  
For whatever reason (perhaps to be standard with European manufacturers), almost ALL sparkplugs made after the "Model T era" have metric threads.

The real old stuff has standard tapered pipe threads.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Tom in Iowa City

10-16-2007 06:53:43




Report to Moderator
 Re: Compression Testing Questions in reply to Bob, 10-15-2007 14:13:25  
Interesting, Bob.
I'm not enough of a machinist to even realize that such a thing as "metric threads" exists! Apologies to Bruce(VA) as well!
With SAE U.S. measures, we would say pitch and so many threads per inch. So in metric, do we refer to so many threads per centimeter?
Tom



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy