Hey, I never made any 'attempt' to prove a point. Thats all been done many years ago & is well documented in the physics books of the world. I set out to try and stop the spread of mis-information by you, as gently as possible, by offering well documented scientific facts.No temper lost her, just frustration at my inability to communicate. If you will re-read the thread, you will see that I never called you "wrong" or even "incorrect" as you did me. You clearly show your loose footing as you dance about like a prize fighter, with ever changing subject argument, for example: 1) you lose half the energy. 2) you lose power 3) output of high tension circuit is zero 4) insert resistance in circuit by opening gap (gap is not a resistance) (a resistance exists in the conducting plasma after arc is established) 5) then a baseless calculation of ma in secondary circuit tied to fictional resistance 6) spark current is reduced The obvious trend here is to not directly address the question, but rather jump somewhere else. From early on, I stated that "I was here to learn, where does 1/2 energy go?" That got a response of "the spark will be weaker", not an answer as to where did the 1/2 energy go. So, I asked again & got "because there is essentially more resistance in the high tension circuit "....well we didn't insert a resistor or re-wind the coil with finer wire. So, still no answer as to where did 1/2 energy go? "I didn"t make this up.." "I"m sorry that you are unable grasp these arguments that address the fact that the spark current is reduced by reversing the polarity of the dc electrical system with out changing the "polarity" of the coil. "I didn"t make this up" isn't much of an argument to grasp. Nor is "But it does..". "You didn"t enter this discussion for any other reason than to tell me I was wrong." Well, I never did tell you that, but I'm still looking for ananswer as to where did half the energy go? And I'm still sticking with the physics & electronics text books in that the coil stores AND releases 1/2 L i^2 every time. If an arc is established, it is all released into that arc and if the gap is so large as to prohibit an arc (dielectric strengh so large-not resistance), then that energy which is still stored in the coil, is still all released. Released either through a breakdown of insulation within the coil, or if that insulation is so good as to prevent that arc, then released by causing an oscillating exchange between the inductance of the primary and the capacitor, until all the energy is dissipated in those elements plus the small amount that is always lost in the arc at the points as they open. Now if you would stop spreading "reverse polarity of the coil causes loss of half the spark energy" and speak of the primary issue with reverse polarity, that being that it is harder to establish the arc due to electron emission from hot/cold metal, then we could stop this exchange and get on with better things AND I won't even call you wrong, not correct, or incorrect.
|