Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo Auction Link (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Antique Tractor Paint and Bodywork

B maniac

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
CNKS

03-12-2006 07:42:20




Report to Moderator

I'm going to start a new thread with a slightly different question. As I said below, I agree with what you said, and will also agree that top of line products have easier repairability, etc. And I will likely try the last coat after sanding, with the fans off. But, as to my booth --The intake filters I am using are not actual paint booth filters, but pretty close to top of the line furnace filters. The ratings indicate that they will filter less that 1 micron -- human hair 70 microns? In other words stuff you can't even see -- correct me if I am wrong. Do I need "true" paint booth filters, they appear to actually be cheaper than good furnace filters, but I would have to order them, and I would like to get this contamination or whatever thing figured out so I can start on my sheet metal--that's the part I would like as near perfect as possible -- I will buff if I have to, and I can take my time, unlike most production body shops. My goal is to do a BETTER job than they do. A few specks don't matter, but at present I am getting too many to suit me. My doors are 4x8 OSB (yes I know that is not code and not even recommended) with 4 16x20 inch openings for filters in each door. Most of the commercial booths I see are nearly solid filter in the door, but I don't have to have their air-flow. I set my fans (variable speed) so that the overspray leaves the area in a few seconds, rather than the OSHA spec of 100 ft/minute. I do this in order to keep the air flow to a minimum, and still not have a much paint dust fall back on the surface -- I think I am accomplishing that. Again I agree with your fan off statement, but am I filtering the intake air properly -- I also need to seal around my doors a little better, that shouldn't be difficult.

[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
Rod (NH)

03-12-2006 14:50:23




Report to Moderator
 Re: B maniac in reply to CNKS, 03-12-2006 07:42:20  
I'll jump in here with a couple of comments.

I believe you've said previously that your booth installation is fairly recent. Do you recall having a similar problem when you were just painting out in your open shop area - before the booth? Just trying to get a grip on whether this is a problem that likely has nothing at all to do with the booth.

Have you ever tried painting parts in your booth with the booth doors wide open? I think it is technically possible that you are aggravating the dust problem by closing the doors. I know that sounds silly, but bear with me.

I understand that you have a walk-in booth for painting parts that is located inside a larger shop area. You have fan(s) that exhaust from the booth at the end opposite the doors, creating a negative pressure inside the booth relative to the surrounding shop. You have doors to the booth that total 64 sf. I'll assume that the cross section of your booth is also at least 64 sf. You have about 18 sf of filters in the doors. Your ratio of filter area to booth section area is 18/64 = 0.28; a little low but not unreasonably so. The standard air flow design, as you know, is 100fpm across the booth section. That's 6400 cfm for your booth. If you are running your fans slow to get rid of overspray using a minimum air flow, let's assume you are running at half the standard design or 50 fpm = 3200 cfm. At that flow, the face velocity at the filters is about 175 fpm (3200/18 = 178). Any crevices or openings that may exist to permit shop air to bypass the filters are going to have an air velocity through them that approaches this number. Any clearance gap between the booth doors and the shop floor is particularly important since shop floors are notoriously dirty/dusty. With the doors closed and an obvious gap at the door bottoms, the effect is not unlike a vacuum cleaner sucking up dust off the floor and exhausting it directly into your booth. It can also stir up dust on the floor just inside the doors and help to spread it into the general airflow pattern.

I know you haven't concluded that your problem is caused by dirt, or solvent pop, or something else. However it might be worth a quick "feel test" with your hand at the door bottom clearance (assuming there is one) with the doors closed and the fans running at the speed you normally use. Just to get an idea as to the airflow at that specific location. You could even do some test painting with the doors open. With the doors open, the face velocity at the booth opening would then be 3200/64 = 50 fpm on average, even down near the floor level. That lower velocity, being a third as great as with the doors closed, would be less likely to stir up dust and carry it into your painting area. Unless your shop area has a lot of normal airborne dust anyway, you could be better of with the doors open than with them shut. Perhaps not probable but certainly possible. Wetting the floor down just outside (and inside) the booth doors or installing door weatherstripping at the bottom would help. It's good to seal up as many leak areas with duct tape or caulking compound that are feasible, but I think the most important leak area is at the door bottom clearance and should be given priority in any sealing efforts. I think this is the case even if you find out your present problem is not related to dust at all.

Food for thought only. Discard as desired.

Rod

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
CNKS

03-12-2006 18:16:27




Report to Moderator
 Re: B maniac in reply to Rod (NH), 03-12-2006 14:50:23  
Nothing to discard, as I have thought about and actually experienced most of what you say. Long story, bear with me. The booth was originally intended to keep overspray out of my 900 sq ft work area. The booth is 8 wide x 10 long x about 7 high. (The doors are 8' tall and protrude above the top of the booth, as I and not a carpenter, and did not build a frame that they fit inside, they close against the outside of the booth. The fans were sized to meet the 100 ft/min spec according to my approx 56 sq ft opening. Turns out I don't need anywhere near that much air to exhaust the fumes in a reasonable amount of time. Also I can leave my heat on as the fumes are contained in the booth, the "make-up air" the fans bring in does not lower the air temp too much so that I can't paint everything in the booth -- it doesn't hold much. The "doors" were to remain open and and be used as extensions to the booth along with frame work to attach plastic sheeting for when I paint the chassis of the tractor -- this is not needed since with the fans on I can paint that without contaminating everything-it doesn't take that long. In fact I had the doors hinged so that I could not close them, they remain opened to the outside along the sides of the booth to save space. When I first began to use the booth, I was painting only small cast/forged parts along with some stamped steel smaller parts that the "nibs" became visible on. They are, of course also on the cast but are not particularly noticeable because of the rough texture. Upon seeing the nibs on the relatively smooth small parts, I realized I had better filter the air. AND, yes I have seen those nibs on sheet metal previously, but the number seemed lower. So I cut openings, as stated below 4 16X20 inch in each door, rehinged the doors so I could close them, and put rubber stripping at the bottom, sides and top -- not a perfect seal, not as good as if the doors actually had a frame but much better than nothing at all. They are pretty well sealed. First I used the cheap furnace filters -- they were not effective. The more expensive ones seem to help, but still did not eliminate the problem. This past Friday, as an experiment, I painted the first large piece, the gas tank of my 460, which except for the bottom, is covered by the hood. Epoxy covered by MTK is enough for this piece, no 182 surfacer. Got a lot of nibs, thus all the questions. As mentioned, I have seen this before, the extent of which was not too bad. Previous tractors were painted in the 900 sq ft area, no exhaust fans, but I did turn on a regular fan to blow the fumes out of the building between coats, along with opening a door and window to get the stuff out. I don't believe I have painted anything without using that fan (which later I decided could spark and kill me with it's exposed wiring and all the fumes in the building -- thus the booth. So thus far I have not done any painting in a completely calm enviornment, I may try that on some small pieces tomorrow. I believe I run the fans low enough to keep dust from coming around the doors, but I will do the air test as you suggested. With the fans wide open, and the shop doors and windows closed, I can almost create a vacuum, and they DO pull dirt in under my shop doors. They also pull a heck of a lot of air in through the window I open slightly to get enough air in. By the time it gets to the booth, maybe 15 feet away, the movement is less, but I am moving air, the relatively small filter openings in the doors probably increase the velocity, but I "feel" no discernable movement in the booth -- but of course I can see the fumes move. Time will tell.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Rod (NH)

03-12-2006 20:11:44




Report to Moderator
 Re: B maniac in reply to CNKS, 03-12-2006 18:16:27  
It would seem then that your problem is most likely not dirt or dust related or even booth related. It seems odd to me that it could be solvent pop because I can't say I've ever experienced it - plus I know you are pretty particular concerning manufacturer instructions, flash times, etc. and are not into pushing any envelopes. Good luck in getting it corrected and be sure to post on the forum when you think you may have found the reason.

Rod

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
CNKS

03-12-2006 20:21:45




Report to Moderator
 Re: B maniac in reply to Rod (NH), 03-12-2006 20:11:44  
Further reading about solvent pop, in addition to the SW site, indicates that there will be a crater after sanding -- I have some of those. Also can be caused by air movement. And I do tend to get the paint thick -- good (visual) coverage in two coats, third is for insurance. I am considering using 168 hardener instead of 167, and increasing the time between coats. Will let you know what I find -- might take a while, thanks.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
B-maniac

03-13-2006 15:00:47




Report to Moderator
 Re: B maniac in reply to CNKS, 03-12-2006 20:21:45  
CNKS; Just a little more info that might help solve your problem. A solvent pop is a minute pimple that when sanded down enough will uncap itself and then be a small crater. A fisheye will be a crater with no top. My experience with fisheyes is they normally show up in the 2nd coat and only get larger if you apply more coats. Don't use fisheye eliminator! It's a poor excuse for a bandaid and will cause orange peel even if used as instructed. Another thing you might try. I do this exclusively. Spray a coat of epoxy primer as a sealer(1hr.+ dry time). This one step solves a few potential problems. 1,It bites into the sanded primer surface better then paint; 2,It then creates a "chemical bond" for your paint which is superior to a mechanical bond.(sand scratches); 3,It covers any "sand throughs" in your surfacer; 4, It creates a "virgin" surface for your top coats,untouched by hands,rags etc.; 5,It takes care of any sand scratch die back and that occasional stray scratch caused by a particle that got under your paper and dug a slightly deeper groove than you knew about.Also it is a recomended procedure by PPG. Also, do you wear a disposable paint suit? Before I did,I used to get contamination(fisheyes) from the deoderant residue in the arm pits of my shirt. This particular deoderant had silica in it(which wont wash out) and was dropping in my paint when I reached out over a large panel(hood etc).My PPG jobber helped me figure that one out. The more input you can give us (CNKS&me)as you eliminate things hopefully we can help you get this gremlin.It really grinds on a guy after while.Good Luck. (PS Dont forget to nib your sealer coat if needed and tack it before paint)

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
CNKS

03-13-2006 17:43:25




Report to Moderator
 Re: B maniac in reply to B-maniac, 03-13-2006 15:00:47  
The parts I have painted so for don't have surfacer, only epoxy, because IMO it isn't sheet metal (meaning hood, etc) and doesn't have to be absolutely smooth. I wondered why you recommended it over surfacer in the frame rail question above. Your explanation makes sense. However, I use Omni MP 170, and it doesn't flow out absolutely smooth. It would seem that the sanded surfacer itself would be smoother than the epoxy primer itself? You said to nib (sand?) it, I suppose since it is over surfacer, it could be lightly sanded, and a few breakthroughs to the surfacer are ok? I haven't worn tyvec coveralls, some lint could come from my clothes. I'm positive I don't have fisheyes, but your description of solvent pop describes some of the nibs, they do have craters after sanding. HOWEVER, since I increased the time between coats today, I may not have many, if I do they are smaller, thus any craters will probably disappear with sanding, unlike the ones I got Friday, when the craters were obvious after sanding. I still think today was mostly dust/lint. In the mornings when the sun shines in just right, I can see thousands of chunks of lint floating around -- I know of nothing I can do about that -- it seems that the filters would trap them, if they are indeed effective to less than one micron, but obviously they are being pulled in with the air. I cleaned walls, floor and ceiling of the booth this morning with a wet towel, towels have lint, then attempted to pull anything floating around in the booth out with the fans before I painted -- didn't work. Remember, I live in the old "dust bowl", lot of dust yesterday. My building is sealed pretty good, did not seem to get in, but I have enough in there anyway. I'm going to start on my hood. I would like to solve the problem first on some other less noticeable pieces, but it appears that I'm just wasting time. Going to do something that counts, and hope that I don't get a quarter inch of paint on it, or wear out my hands sanding before I figure it out.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Rod (NH)

03-12-2006 20:35:53




Report to Moderator
 Re: B maniac in reply to CNKS, 03-12-2006 20:21:45  
That doesn't seem any different from the way I apply it. I get very near full coverage on the first coat over either 170 or 182, really complete on the second, and use a third for good measure. I have never considered that to be too heavy. I have never used the 167 hardener though. I stick with the 168 as I always like to go on the hot side of things if the call is anywhere near close.

I see I was writing when you were posting to Dave above. If I had known you were responding, I wouldn't have answered since your post was correct and didn't need anything added.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
CNKS

03-12-2006 21:09:03




Report to Moderator
 Re: B maniac in reply to Rod (NH), 03-12-2006 20:35:53  
As to the hardener, my brain malfunctioned, again. If I am recoating too soon, 168 will make the flash time longer, I don't want that. How much effect does one step in hardener have on flash time anyway? (I have your post on temp ranges of reducers/hardeners printed out).



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Rod (NH)

03-13-2006 07:42:10




Report to Moderator
 Re: B maniac in reply to CNKS, 03-12-2006 21:09:03  
I have no idea. Those temp ranges that I arbitrarily applied to the three hardeners are just my crude way of deciding which one to use myself. Unlike DuPont, PPG doesn't recommend specific temperature ranges for their different hardeners and reducers. I have officially asked them for guidance on the matter in the past and got a non-responsive answer. So I came up with my own. I just took the available number of hardeners or reducers and spread them over a reasonable total temp range from 60F up into the 90s - with "fast" being at the bottom and "very slow" being at the top, with some overlap. I estimated the 168 for 70-85. I seldom do any painting down in the 60's and never above 85, so I've never used anything but the 168. I don't know how correct my method of selection is but I don't think it can be too far off. Plus I don't think it is that critical unless you are way off base.

I have never actually measured any intercoat flash time. I don't think it is that critical either unless you are way out of line from what is recommended. For MTK it's 5-10 minutes at 70F per the tech sheet. At the temperatures I paint, I'm usually not far above that. I just stop for a while, go stir the remaining paint, assess whether I have enough mixed to complete the parts(s) I am doing, go in the house, have a drink, come back and get onto the next coat. I don't know if it's been 8 min or 15 min and it varies each time, simply because of the random nature of my doing it. I am pretty sure it is always significantly longer than 5 minutes though. If I'm at 80 or above, I might make a "mental adjustment" to wait a "little longer" but it's not any kind of calculated or measured process. At 75 though, I wouldn't make any mental adjustment at all - it wouldn't even occur to me to bother.

If you have good flowout with the 167, there is no reason for you too change it that I can see, even if you are outside my arbitrary temperature ranges. If you really suspect that flash times are the cause of your problem, I'd just make sure that you give it at least 10 min if you're near 70 and consciously extend it if you're below. Say, maybe give it 20 min if you at 60. I don't know, but think it's more important to lengthen the time when you are cooler than normal than to shorten it when you are warmer. It's also probably important to lengthen it when doing small pieces. Size is not accounted for at all in the tech sheets, but should be a factor, in my way of thinking. When you're spraying a whole car, there is some amount of automatic built-in flash time just because it takes a while to complete a coat and get back to where you started. If you're painting a small part, that transit time is essentially zero. DuPont's recommendation for Centari is no flash time at all between coats - has been for the last 25 years (contrasted with Delstar's 15-20 min). I've given Centari some time when I've used it more recently, simply because I was painting a panel at a time, not an overall.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
B-maniac

03-12-2006 09:20:03




Report to Moderator
 Re: B maniac in reply to CNKS, 03-12-2006 07:42:20  
CNKS ; I went back through all the info posted below about the problem you are describing.I really don't think you have an air filtering problem. I believe the filters you are using are fine and with the moderate air flow you have by turning down the fan speed,I don,t think you are sucking dirty air from around doors etc.From the way you described the imperfections,it almost sounds to me more like solvent popping. That wuold explain the "last coat" imperfections because thats where they usually happen. It sounds like you,like myself,like to really dump the paint on,and thats good because it levels itself smooth and saves a lot of work later.Usually a good painter with good equipment will have this problem because you have mastered the art of applying a lot of paint ,evenly ,and having it flow out like glass,WITHOUT runs or sags.The unfortunate consequence of this is we get a lot more paint on in each coat and that means a lot more reducer has to be able to get out also. We put the next coat on before all the solvent has gotten out and after the third coat sets for a while and skins over,the trapped solvents from the first two are trying to push their way through the third coat and cause these little round bumps to show up.I am thinking that is what you have. Fisheyes,which are caused by contamination are craters. If sanded over they still show up shiny until sanded enough to where they are gone.You know when I told you that I put on one "double coat" of clear over my base coat? That's not recomended,but that's my way of eliminating solvent pop. Both coats go on at the same time and therefore there is no "skin" to hold back the solvent and create bumps.I wouldnt recommend it to newcommers because they will surely will get some nasty runs.It also cuts down on any other contaminants because they only have ONE chance at a wet coat to land on. The other method to insure against solvent pop is to thin more and use more thin coatsor use slower reducer/cat. or wait twice as long between coats or combinations of the above. You sound like a pretty intelligent person so I won't go into all the other common things to check as far as preventing contaminations. You sound as though you have done everything right as far as conditions are concerned. Is the inlet to your air compressor isolated from areas where WD-40 or other such products are used? Just a thought. I guess my way of thinking is that if this happens in the 3rd coat ,then figure out a way to not put a 3rd coat on.Sometimes we have to adapt the products or procedures to fit our invironment because we (including myself) are not going to spend the thousands to have a perfect environment like the ones where these products were developed. I have experimented with this stuff for a long time and the "paint peaple" would have my head if they knew what I have had to do to adapt their product to make it work for me.Directions are,to me, just a guide to start with since they don't take into account anything that isn't just perfect. Hope I was of some help! There are no "black/white answers to any of this. Keep experimenting,you will find it.I will be watching and try to answer any specifics you might have that didn't get answered here.LOL P.S. I still come across these "gremlins" after all these years. They never end ,and niether does the learning.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
CNKS

03-12-2006 10:49:37




Report to Moderator
 Re: B maniac in reply to B-maniac, 03-12-2006 09:20:03  
Parts cleaning solvents or products similar to WD 40 are used at least 30 feet away from my air compressor, and as far as I can tell no water gets past my two water traps -- if it does it isn't visible, but microscopic. I don't have an actual dryer like the body shops use. The last trap is probably 100 pipe feet from the compressor. The link is to SW's paint defects that Rod(NH) provided some time ago. If not dirt, then as you said solvent pop may be the most likely. Other possibilities are air entrapment, blistering, and dust. Since I can't see particularly well through my hood, and I don't examine what I have done closely until after the last coat, (because all the iso's might not be gone), I'm not sure when the first nib appears. I should be able to figure that out by painting a couple of small pieces that I have previously painted and now are sanded flat. I get the impression from the SW site that the "craters" they mention are erupted -- mine are enclosed, and I don't find the crater until I have sanded. (This sounds like a fish eye, but the unsanded bump does not look like a fisheye to me, I don't think I have ever seen one). In other words the bump appears to be solid down to about paint level, then there is a hole with paint in the bottom from a previous coat, I guess. Sometimes there is a ring down to the last coat with a sanded peak in the middle. Other "bumps" disappear with the initila sanding, depends on their size. Apparantly solvent pop, blistering, and air entrapment can all be caused by too thick paint or inadequate flash time. So, I need to correct that, and pay more attention to when this is actually happening. Thanks for your help. You and Rod know a heck of a lot more than I do.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy