I have indicated that I am not a fan of etch primers, prefering epoxy instead. I'll try and explain why. When doing old sheet metal from the ground up, you invariably run across the need to use some plastic filler, even if you do a decent job of banging out all dents, etc. There are some experts that can work metal so smooth that you don't need filler but I certainly am not one of them. I also do not have the patience to even try! My work flow in this instance is to sandblast, prime with epoxy, apply filler where needed and sand. At this point I always have some amount of bare metal showing, having unavoidably sanded off some of the epoxy. Take a look at the PPG OMNI tech sheet for MP176, their etch primer. Notice that the only compatible substrate is "properly cleaned and sanded steel, galvanized, aluminum". My part now has three different substrates to go over; 1) epoxy, 2) bare plastic filler and 3) bare steel. How do I treat the now bare steel portions? The same situation would exist if I had used etch primer instead of epoxy. I would be left with applying more etch primer over a substrate (in this case, plastic filler) that is not recommended by the manufacturer. It would be next to impossible to spot just the bare steel, certainly not practical. That problem does not exist when using epoxy primer. Take a look at the PPG OMNI tech sheet for MP170, their epoxy primer. Notice the compatible substrates: "cleaned and sanded steel, galvanized, aluminum, fiberglass, old finishes, body filler" plus a host of other PPG OMNI primer products. I can now put more epoxy over my example above, keep within the manufacturer's recommendations and avoid a possible problem later on. I suppose I could have used the etch primer first in the above example and after sanding the filler, use epoxy but what have I gained in doing so? I am still left with epoxy on some bare steel where the etch has been sanded off. Some will argue that etch is the only way to fly and I agree that it certainly is a lot easier and faster than dealing with the messy two-step process with phosphoric acid that I noted previously, if you are going to "etch" at all. In any event different etch primers may have quite different rules for use so I think anyone using them should carefully review the tech sheet for the particular product to be sure of material compatibility. Use of etch on cast iron is somewhat questionable. It is not mentioned in the tech sheet (at least for the MP176) but I am not surprised at that since cast iron is not normally a part of autobody work, the prime market for products such as these. PPG does not recommend phosphoric acid treatment for cast iron. Since etch primer does have a phosphoric acid component, that might be a caution sign. My gut feeling is that I just wouldn't do it...but of course I am biased in favor of epoxy :o). I have no idea of the cost difference. I used a DuPont etch primer once (Variprime, I think) a long time ago. I changed to epoxy shortly thereafter and never looked back. My guess is that the epoxy is more expensive but I have no real basis for that. Most likely you would have to put something on top of the etch anyway prior to topcoating...check the tech sheet for the topcoat you are using to verify that the etch primer is a recommended substrate. For PPG OMNI MAE acrylic enamel and MTK acrylic urethane, it is not. As far as etch primer over sandblasted steel (bright metal blast), I don't particularly see the need or advantage over epoxy. Didn't someone...Cliff maybe...caution about etch over a blast profile recently? Something about it possibly becoming too thick? The MP176 indicates that a maximum film build of less than half a mil is to be used. That's not much considering that an epoxy or even a topcoat is about one mil per coat. My tendency would be to avoid it here also, but I am open to any thoughts to the contrary.
|