Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo Auction Link (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Antique Tractor Paint and Bodywork

OMNI Hardener

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
Rod (NH)

05-02-2004 15:32:45




Report to Moderator

Well, it's Spring and the temperatures are back up there where I can do a little painting. I painted some small parts for my AC-B sickle mower yesterday and thought I would pass along my experience.

I used MP170 epoxy primer under MTK acrylic urethane on the metal parts. Since both wood (oak) and a decal was involved in addition to metal, I clearcoated everything with MC161 urethane clear. The epoxy MP175 catalyst was approximately two years old and had been opened before on several occasions as long as two years ago. The hardener for both the MTK and the MC 160 was the slow hardener (MH168) since temperatures were in the high 70s. The MH 168 was also about two years old and had been opened and partially used similar to the epoxy catalyst. All products have also been through many freeze/thaw cycles since they have been kept in an unheated shop over two winters.

The label instructions for the MH168 say to use the entire contents within 14 days of first opening. Well, I am way past that :o). I didn't put any kind of inert gas in the air space during previous uses as some may do. Anyway, there did not appear to be any gelling of the contents remaining in the 1/4 full quart so I decided to try the stuff out. The hardener was fairly expensive ($26/qt) and I really didn't want to go buy more just for a small use and wind up wasting a lot.

It seems to have worked well even with the old catalyst and hardener. The films set up normally and today the parts have been reassembled. So if you have some old OMNI hardener that has not noticeably gelled and you are not using it in work-for-pay or especially important projects, go ahead and save some money and use it. I will not hesitate to do that again.

I would be interested in the experience of others along such lines. I have a can of PPG DXR80 hardener that is over 20 years old. That was (is) used with their Delstar AE. It has not been opened but seems to be in a liquid state. Anyone care to guess if it is still usable? I have an old gallon of Delstar black that is half full so I may try that out the next time I have a need for something black.

third party image Rod

[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
John

05-03-2004 20:00:45




Report to Moderator
 Re: OMNI Hardener in reply to Rod (NH), 05-02-2004 15:32:45  
You can get MH168 in less than QT cans, I would not recomend Omni to be used on only an implememt or piece of equipment that either has little value or is in poor shape. Omni has to be one of the worst paints in its class, I would recomend ANY other brand. Nason, U-Tec, Lesonal, Sikkens, Dupont, S+W, Martin Senior, Etc. Just ask around



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Rod (NH)

05-04-2004 21:14:37




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: OMNI Hardener in reply to John, 05-03-2004 20:00:45  
Hi John,

Well, I guess we just disagree about the OMNI. I have had excellent luck with it (MTK and MC). Same goes for the OMNI epoxy primer and their surfacer. I have only heard others complain about coverage with the OMNI MBC. I don't do bc/cc so that doesn't concern me. I find the MTK coverage to be very good. I typically use 3 coats but certainly could get by with the 2 minimum recommended on the tech sheet. That agrees nicely with the 3 coats recommended for the higher priced Centari AE and the 2-3 coats recommended for the higher priced Delstar AE. I also always used 3 coats when using either the Centari or the Delstar. So my own experience, although more limited with the OMNI, simply doesn't bear out the "twice as much paint" claim. Perhaps there could be an issue with coverage depending on color or uniformity of the substrate? I always put my color coat on a totally even-colored base, usually the grey epoxy or the grayish tan of the surfacer. My experience with the OMNI has been only with orange on both of those so I can't confirm good coverage with other topcoat colors or non-uniform substrates. I don't do metallics anymore so I can't address that possible factor either.

I also have not had a problem with drying that you mention. The MTK is always dry to the touch in just a few hours - no worse than others I have used, and the MC clear can be handled easily in a couple of hours. I simply have not had any problem or complaint at all with drying. Componding is not an issue with me either. I assume when you say polish that you really mean compounding. As Butch says, such a refinement in surface finish is not practical for most tractor work. Perhaps the hood and fenders maybe...but if you have to go to that effort to obtain an acceptable finish, you are either doing something wrong or you are treating a tractor like that Mercedes I occasionally bring up. Actually, I have seen some single stage non-compounded finishes that would be suitable for a Mercedes but then again maybe I please too easily.

Poor gloss retention? Well, I have one of my tractors outside that was done two years ago in MTK and the gloss and color shade is just as fine as the day it was sprayed. It is never housed so sees the NH weather outside continuously in all seasons. I'll have to reserve judgement for times exceeding two years but I guess I will find out if poor gloss retention (relatively) is a valid complaint.

Worst smell? I am not into siffing paints so I can't say :o). I don't recall it being any "worse" than Centari or Delstar. All the four or five different hardeners that I have had the displeasure of smelling have a rather obnoxious odor to them. Worse than the paint with no hardener. In any event, after mixing I am inside a fresh air mask so smell is not a factor for me.

As far as other manufacturers are concerned, I only have three available in my local area. DuPont, PPG and Martin Senour. I have no experience with the MS lines. My past intermittent experience over 30 years has been with DuPont's Centari and PPG's Delstar. I have been using OMNI, along with some Centari for the past two-three years. I have not tried the NASON line in DuPont. I guess I would have to have a future poor experience with the OMNI that I attributed to the paint for me to bother to try a different product line since I have a small investment in different temperature reducers and hardeners that are specific to it.

Thanks for your comments but I just can't agree with your "anybody but OMNI" putdown. I know the high-enders will look down on most "economy" lines as do the bc/cc crowd with AE. That's life and expected. I am pleased with OMNI for the price and have no reason yet to look elsewhere.

third party image Rod

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
CNKS

05-04-2004 17:42:36




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: OMNI Hardener in reply to John, 05-03-2004 20:00:45  
We have already asked around and find Omni to be quite competitive with others in it's class--combined we have several years of experience with Omni. You are the first person to say this on this board in the 3 years or so I have been reading it. Have not seen any complaints on the other painting boards either, from people who understand it is not premium paint. Granted there are better paints, Omni is the PPG's economy line, most of us don't want to spend the extra money for results that may not be "that much better" than Omni. By the way DuPont makes Nason, you listed it as a separate brand. What has been your problem with Omni?

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
John

05-04-2004 18:07:25




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: OMNI Hardener in reply to CNKS, 05-04-2004 17:42:36  
I understand that you are not looking to buy premium paint, and I have not sprayed MAE but have MTK and MBC, I found the OMNI line to be very price competative with all the others in the low price market. But what I have seen is that in Omni, you need to buy twice as much paint to cover the same amount as some of the other brands. Also found Onmi to be slow drying(days instead of hours), very hard to polish, poor gloss retention, and has a smell that has to be the worst of all. I am aware that Nason is made by Dupont. But my point is I would recomend, Utec from Sikkens or Nason form Dupont over Omni. It may run 10% more in price but is gives much better job, and is more user friendly. I am a paint salesman by trade and am just pointing out the facts, Yes Omni looks better than a cheap equipment enamel from the farm store, but is not liked well by any profesional users or dit it your selfers. I am not trying to bash on PPG here.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
John

05-06-2004 20:51:23




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: OMNI Hardener in reply to John, 05-04-2004 18:07:25  
Well I am glad that this site will wont turn into a paint war. All of your points were well taken. I must agree that not all of these brands are easy to purchase in all areas. I guess that my main point is that, there is some other paint brands out there that are starting to gain market share now. I agree that we can not compare delstar or centari to omni. Most of my complaints come from the use of MBC which is base coat, I like to paint hoods, side panels, and fenders with BC/CC and the rest in single stage. I will also agree that MTK is not to bad, but MBC, is pretty lame, in most areas. I have grown to like the Nason line from dupont, has 5 or 6 different qualitys, and some the U-Tech line fron Sikkens. Best product is going to be most likely going to be decided by how much assistance you get from the paint store.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
CNKS

05-04-2004 19:33:37




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: OMNI Hardener in reply to John, 05-04-2004 18:07:25  
I have found Omni to have good gloss retention. It dries very fast, I have buffed it the next day. It covers very well in three coats, do you use less? Smell?--It is paint--do you use a supplied air system? Not well like by ANY professional users? -- they probably use high end paints so they can get done faster, (also make more money on the paint, assuming a percentage increase over wholesale) since most customers want their cars back faster. I don't try to paint a tractor with all of it's small parts in a day, and I would never do it as a business because I am too slow. I would not want my car painted with Omni either, because as far as cars go I am a perfectionist, I don't paint cars -- but tractors aren't cars. I hope this board doesn't turn into a paint war, as some of the tractor boards have turned into: one brand vs another -- there is room for all (excluding the tractor store paints, which there is general agreement on) You will notice that I did not bad-mouth any of the brands you mentioned.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Butch

05-04-2004 18:50:14




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: OMNI Hardener in reply to John, 05-04-2004 18:07:25  
Thanks for the input on the Omni. It helps that you qualified yourself a bit, some take that as being a smart alec but not I. You must realize that we read this is junk and that us junk on here quite a bit and personaly I have seen people take top quality materials and do a rotten job with them then blame the product so I take the bashers with a grain of salt. Along with CN I am one of the Omni MTK proponants on here. Cant argue that we (I) may be too easy to please. I just wish I could get the old Delstar that I could apply flat blindfolded in any temp within 10 degrees of optimum. I too was dissapointed at first with Omni's coverage and difficulties with the temp sensitive application because of my Delstar experience. I understand that buffing is am important consideration for automotive work but I look for a material that lays down nice (for tractor work) without buffing and I get that with Omni. Buffing a tractor is next to impossible anyway, too many nooks and crannies, too many places to sling compound that it is impossible to remove like castings and all the other things that stick out. Can't argue that we may be too easy to please however I will argue that it is stretching it a bit to claim that Omni is fit for nothing but keeping plow moldboards from rusting till next season. I have results in the tractor garage to rebuke that.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
CNKS

05-04-2004 19:39:23




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: OMNI Hardener in reply to Butch, 05-04-2004 18:50:14  
Ditto on your last sentence.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Butch

05-02-2004 18:38:18




Report to Moderator
 Re: OMNI Hardener in reply to Rod (NH), 05-02-2004 15:32:45  
Rod I have a 4 year old can of DXR80 that I use with black Delstar. The black gets used sparingly and has been opened a lot but it still seems to be just fine. I do keep it in a refrigerator. On my last project, which was dome with Omni, I used of the last of an opened can of MH168 that was over a year old but also kept in the fridge. Could not tell any difference. Thanks for bringing this up, I was too timid to do that myself

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Rod (NH)

05-02-2004 21:19:04




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: OMNI Hardener in reply to Butch, 05-02-2004 18:38:18  
Ha, ha, ha. There is somebody out there that has some old Delthane that works. The stuff I have shakes well and is obviously still liquid and not gelled in any way. Course it has never been opened. I kinda hate to open it up now just to use a little for black. I wish I had some DAR 60080 to use it with! I checked the can and there is no caution about using it up in any particular time like is on the OMNI product. I also checked out two hardeners that are used with DuPont's Centari AE. One is the old standard 793S and the other is the newer "Centari Ultra" 8105S. Neither of those have any time-of-use caution after opening. They do say to keep the container tightly closed and the 793S indicates that subjection to moisture can cause gelling. BTW nice looking ACs you have in plow formation posted on the other board.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Butch

05-03-2004 08:29:55




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: OMNI Hardener in reply to Rod (NH), 05-02-2004 21:19:04  
Rod, if you realy want some Delstar 60080 I have a buddy in MI that can still get it, around $165 per gallon. I can hook you up with him. I don't know what I am going to do for black when that old quart of Delstar runs out. The things I use it for on the old A-Cs are easier to brush and Omni doesnt lend itself to brushing.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Rod (NH)

05-03-2004 17:23:09




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: OMNI Hardener in reply to Butch, 05-03-2004 08:29:55  
Wow! I expected $100/gal or so but not that high. No wonder the local suppliers in my area stopped stocking the mix colors. With the autobody world now mostly bc/cc urethane and lower-end paints like OMNI MAE and MTK available for the economy minded, I am surprised PPG still makes it at all. Not much market left for a high-end AE (an oxymoron nowadays).

Thanks for the offer but I will pass at that price. My interest drops rapidly when the price much exceeds $100/ready-to-spray (RTS) gal.

You might look to DuPont's Centari AE for a replacement black if you haven't already tried any of it. Nice stuff, similar to Delstar in quality. The last time I bought some of that was about 3 yrs ago. I think the price was around $100 per RTS gal, maybe a little more. That was dark blue which is likely at the low end of the color price scale, similar to black. I have used it with a brush for painting a 3/8" chain and it seemed to work well enough. Sprays very well and is difficult to run. Nice flowout. It may go the way of Delstar before much longer. Not available in persian orange since the NASON line hit the street.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
CNKS

05-02-2004 17:56:27




Report to Moderator
 Re: OMNI Hardener in reply to Rod (NH), 05-02-2004 15:32:45  
First time I've ever seen you go against labeled recommendations. The first tractor I painted a couple of years ago, I did not know about the 2 week interval (although it says that right on the can), and I am sure I used it when it was 3 or 4 weeks old. The cast and sheet metal were done within the 2 week inteval. A lot of the smaller parts were not. Specifically, the lights and air cleaner cap were done close to the last if I remember right. These have lost some of their gloss. On the lights this seemed to occur a few days after painting, and the paint seemed softer, or did not cure as fast. I'm not saying for sure the hardener is the cause, as my technique leaves a lot to be desired, and I could have recoated too soon, which can cause dieback. The hardener is not cheap, and I hate to toss it. I have some old hardener I might try on some piece just to see what it does. Since that time I have used a product called Bloxygen that I squirt in and immediately replace the cap, forget what it costs but not much. I'm also going to buy a small refigerator. But -- you may be right -- new hardener probably works better than old. But, on a tractor or implement, particularly on parts that you don't need to see yourself in, maybe it's ok. With my luck, though, the paint might fall off. I don't think there is a problem with the epoxy catalyst, it should certainly last several months, perhaps a couple of years, as you found. I was told by another painter who like you has a lot of experience, that you could use old 168 topcoat hardener as a hardener in the 182 surfacer instead of the recommended 165? (don't remember the number). I did and didn't have a problem with the 182 drying either too fast or slow. Another thing I found (don't remember if you or the other guy told me this), the 182 flows out a LOT better diluted 5% with reducer--less sanding.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Rod (NH)

05-02-2004 21:29:49




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: OMNI Hardener in reply to CNKS, 05-02-2004 17:56:27  
Well, I do generally follow the manufacturer's specific instructions and advise others to do the same. There was a practical side to my trying this with old hardener though. I had about 8 oz left in that can of 2yr old MH168. I only needed about 2 oz for the work I was going to do. I don't have any plans for additional painting in the immediate future...maybe later this summer but certainly not within the next two weeks. I could have gone and bought some new stuff and thrown most of it away :o(. I think PPG markets quantities smaller then a qt but the last time I bought any my supplier only stocked qts. He supplies to the local autobody industry so I suspect he doesn't have a big enough demand to stock quantities smaller than a qt. That's a big loss to just throw about 30 oz away! Such is the situation with people like me who paint piecemeal. The desire to at least try it was therefore irresistable. It hardened up just fine in 24 hrs although I haven't tried to scrape it in any way. I may experience a loss of gloss as you mention but time will tell. It's not a hood or a fender so from that standpoint it is not so important.

I have never tried the Bloxygen. I expect any dry inert gas would serve the purpose of keeping air out of the container and presumably prolong the safe usage time. I might try using argon. I have plenty of that on hand...just flow some into the can. It might also be that the 14 days is overly conservative for product liability reasons. I guess I'll find out for myself in the days ahead.

I have never tried adding a reducer to the MP182. I have not found it to be necessary. However, I am used to spraying quite wet coats anyway with non-hvlp equipment so I haven't noticed an issue with flowout. Seems fine to me w/o a reducer.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
CNKS

05-03-2004 06:47:33




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: OMNI Hardener in reply to Rod (NH), 05-02-2004 21:29:49  
After what you and Butch said, I'm not going to worry about 3 or 4 week old hardener, think I'll continue to use the gas though -- cheap insurance. As to the diluted 182, that's probably more my lack of technique. Also my primer gun had too big a tip, I have since corrected that. You will note in my responses on this board, I have never actually suggested to anyone how to spray, just what to use. My supplier can get hardener in pints, half pints, and quarts, depending on the number, however it seems the 168 only comes in quarts, as luck would have it.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy