Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo Auction Link (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Antique Tractor Paint and Bodywork

IH red

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
CNKS

07-18-2005 06:14:58




Report to Moderator

The thread below is getting long and involved. In that thread several codes for IH red are mentioned. For IH 50 (pre 1949) DuPont 7410/PPG 70019/PPG 71969. For IH 2150 (the "accepted" color for post 1949, although it did not appear until 1961), DuPont 96766/PPG 71310/71096 -- I'm not positive if 71096 is IH 50 or 2150, same for 71969. In some of the stuff I have from Frank Stalfire is a statement that says "The IHC red is a challenge because IHC often bought paint based more on price than consistent color." -- Yup -- It then recommends DuPont 6951 or 96766 for the later red (PPG 71310) and PPG 70019/Dupont 5943/6990/24440/27146, for the early red but does not mention DuPont 7410 in this particular section. So, I think every one is on their own, and nothing can be proven, just argued about. I'm going to check out PPG 71969 and 71096 sometime, maybe Scott will beat me to it because I'm not ready to paint yet. Since IH also had 1102B (replaced by IH 201) in the 50's, some of the above colors may cross to those -- but I have never seen a cross reference for 1102B or 201.

[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
sammy the RED

07-21-2005 06:53:03




Report to Moderator
 Re: IH red in reply to CNKS, 07-18-2005 06:14:58  
I saw a Farmall M at a Iowa show that had been painted with John Deere Red. Looked good. A little darker than IH-2150.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Daniel H.

07-19-2005 07:55:57




Report to Moderator
 Re: IH red in reply to CNKS, 07-18-2005 06:14:58  
Do you have a Tractor Supply Company in your area? If so get a spray bomb of IH RED and shoot a sample piece. It is very close to the Delstar. The paint is BPS (Best Paint Sold) which is made by Valspar That might give you a good color sample to match. I found my receipt for the paint but it has no numbers on it.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
scott#2

07-20-2005 19:42:22




Report to Moderator
 Re: IH red in reply to Daniel H., 07-19-2005 07:55:57  
Thanks Daniel, Ill probably try that too, especially if my experiment doesnt work out.

scott#2



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
CNKS

07-19-2005 17:22:20




Report to Moderator
 Re: IH red in reply to Daniel H., 07-19-2005 07:55:57  
Case-IH 2150 is probably as close as you can get to the correct color, or at least as close to the the color as it was when IH introduced it in 1961. (I'm not saying that TSC or Delstar is not close to being correct) -- but no one has any proof that ANY companies paint is "correct". It's all subjective, and accurate or inacurrate in the eyes of the person looking at it. I don't imagine that 2150 is the same shade as it was in 1961, either, as the manufacturer has changed.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
RustyFarmall

07-19-2005 07:42:49




Report to Moderator
 Re: IH red in reply to CNKS, 07-18-2005 06:14:58  
I've been following this discussion for a few days now and while I understand your goals to have a top quality paint job I really don't understand why it has to be so complicated. I am really happy that I am always satisfied with the results I get using the IH 2150 from my Case-IH dealer. This is just my opinion, and your tractors are not mine, so to each his own.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
scott#2

07-19-2005 14:53:51




Report to Moderator
 Re: IH red in reply to RustyFarmall, 07-19-2005 07:42:49  
Its not complicated at all. I am basically on a fact finding mission in hopes of setteling a longtime, inconsistant problem that some experience with 71310. The buck always stops on my desk and I always get to the bottom of things no matter what or how long it takes. (there is probably some professional help available for me somewhere, but that would ruin all the fun) I simply want a more durable paint and in the right color, in the Omni line. The impossible we accomplish immediatly, the insanely absurd may take a day or two. Thanks RustyFarmall,

scott#2

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
CNKS

07-19-2005 14:52:39




Report to Moderator
 Re: IH red in reply to RustyFarmall, 07-19-2005 07:42:49  
I may have to switch to CIH 2150, if I can't figure what the problem with Omni is, or else move up to Concept, still with no guarantee my dealer won't screw something up. 2150 has the advantage that it is premixed, and is more or less consistent from batch to batch, although I have heard of problems with it also. The reason some of us like higher quality paint is that we spend days, weeks, and in my case, months preparing a tractor, not just for paint, but the mechanical aspects also. I completely strip the old paint, rust, what ever off, every part I can get off the tractor comes off and is repaired if need be and treated separately as far as paint goes. Each part is primed with epoxy primer, and nearly all non-cast parts get multiple coats of a sandable surfacer so that the surface is absolutely smooth. After all that time and preparation, most of us think nothing of spending 2 or 3 times the price of CIH 2150. Case IH has only one primer, one primer does not necessarily fit all situations. I prefer to use multiple products that are all compatible with each other. I'm not saying that 2150 cannot be used in this situation (again, I may have to) but synthetic enamel simply does not have the quality of even the cheaper paints by PPG, DuPont, etc. If it did, all the car manufacturers would be using it. No tractor or automobile manufacturer uses synthetic enamel anymore, with the possible exception of the finish on things like a car trailer I bought a couple of months ago. 2150 does not come in acrylic urethane, which can be color sanded and compounded the next day if necessary, a procedure I don't care for, but with my limited painting skills is sometimes necessary. Acrylic urethane will hold it's color for years. I understand that whoever makes 2150 now has a hardener for it, if hardener is not used, what you see is what you get, it can't be corrected for months. I like for it to be perfect, don't always get there, but I try. Paint to me is primary, not secondary as it is to many people. The mechanical part is primary also, although I don't completely restore the mechanical part -- that is cost prohibitive, for me anyway. I would rather have rust than a lousy paint job. I have bought two tractors with 50-50 paint jobs--looks good from 50 feet away at 50 mph (I would have paid MORE for rust, because I have to remove all the new paint and start over) or in someone pictures -- pictures don't show the detail. Only my opinion. Each person is free to do as he or she wants. If it suits you it suits me.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
soctt#2

07-18-2005 12:12:16




Report to Moderator
 Re: IH red, continued... in reply to CNKS, 07-18-2005 06:14:58  
That does it for me. I just got off the phone with the PPG guy and he says that Delstar is gone. I wasnt really too happy about putting that over the MP products anyways, same with Concept. He went on to say that if I could produce a peice of material painted with the correct color, they could scan it and mix it in Omni. (Ill believe that when I see it and they said a picture of it wont do) Failing that I can call the "Color Library" (whatever that is), give them the old Delstar# and they might be able to cross it over to a newer # and mix it in Omni.

So, who would send me a piece of their tractor thats the same as or very close to Daniels that I can borrow for a couple of days? Or, what was that Delstar paint code that Daniel painted his tractor with. That color is the closest so far that Ive seen and PPG doesnt have any old Delstar records anymore.

By the way PPG lists 71096 as Matador red, they say its kind of a fire engine red.

Daniel can you find that old Delstar code #? Or could I convince you to send me a small, painted piece of something at least 4" x 4" square and flat?

Sounds pretty foolish to me. Thanks for all your help.

scott#2

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
scott#2

07-18-2005 12:55:29




Report to Moderator
 Re: IH red, continued... in reply to soctt#2, 07-18-2005 12:12:16  
I called the "Color Library" (PPG's technical help division) and they said Omni 71310 is an ORANGE based red and with Omni, "you get what you get". They said that they still did sell Delstar (in certain areas)and that the 71310 Delstar is a BLUE based red. There's the difference. She also said that there is a new Omni line out (as of 2 weeks ago)called Omni Plus (better color matching)but that they probably wont develop codes for all thrse "obscure colors" (too bad, I would wait, yep Im just that weird about it).

If I cant get a sample of the Delstar 71310, I will throw the dice and try to get the paint guy to mix up some Omni 71310 with less orange and we'll see what that looks like. At this point I dont even think I will try a spray out of the sample I have. I dont think its worth cleaning the gun over. It just isnt the right color.

Still looking for a Delstar sample,

Thank You,

scott#2

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
CNKS

07-18-2005 13:38:10




Report to Moderator
 Re: IH red, continued... in reply to scott#2, 07-18-2005 12:55:29  
Many people seem to think that Case-IH 2150 is the correct color, it really isn't, but a lot of people use it. I have forgotten the year of your tractor, but if I remember right the correct color is IH 1102B, for the 460 I'm preparing to paint it is IH 201. Provided those two colors are not available, the best thing to do might be to spray a sample of Case-IH 2150, and have it matched in Omni, or whatever you decide to use. Also, there is a person on the Red Power Forum named Cliff Neubaurer (maybe misspelled). He posts on here occasionally. He has painted several tractors with Omni 71310, and claims it is not orange, not much, anyway. I don't know why his is red and ours orange. I have seen his pictures, and don't see any orange. I haven't decided what I'm going to do, yet, as I'm not ready to paint. My 71310 Super H looks ok to me in full sun, unless it's parked next to a darker one--maybe the dark one is wrong, or maybe both are wrong. My 71310 C looks good to me, I actually think it turned darker with age, even inside. Many of the older Farmalls did fade to orange, and for a while, toward the end of WWII and for a couple of years thereafter, there was a shortage of red pigment, and IH substituted orange. So in those years it actually was correct, although they changed the formulation as soon as they could. Another option is to use DuPont 96766, or the Sherwin Williams equivalent (I don't have a SW dealer). I'm not too wild about DuPont because I'm used to the Omni line, and reading DuPonts spec sheets, they recommend a sealer (another step) before topcoating with Nason. It seems more complicated, but it would be worth it if the color was correct -- not saying it is. I'm out of ideas. Thanks for making those calls to PPG.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Cliff Neubauer

07-20-2005 10:56:58




Report to Moderator
 Re: IH red, continued... in reply to CNKS, 07-18-2005 13:38:10  
third party image

The first time I used 71310 was on our 706 and as you can see there was an orange tint to it at first but once we got it outside you couldn't notice it and now four years later the Omni still looks as good as it did when it was painted unlike the 2150 and Gloss Red I painted at around the same time. Last summer I had our 706 and 1086 both painted with 71310 at the Red Power Roundup in Mt. Pleasant and they both got alot of comments but I never heard anybody question them being the correct shade of red. I will say that the guy who used to mix my paint was second to none and had done a fair share of painting himself so he might have been doing a better job of tinting the paint than the average guy. Also that dealer sells alot of Omni paint so they are probably mixing from a fairly fresh batch of tinters. I've also noticed a difference in the color between cans of 2150 so it has problems too. Unless your tractor is going to be a show tractor that seldom sees sunlight in the long run I think you are going to see a more consistant color with the automotive paints because they are much more resistant to fading.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
scott#2

07-20-2005 19:39:54




Report to Moderator
 Re: IH red, continued... in reply to Cliff Neubauer, 07-20-2005 10:56:58  
That sure looks more orange than red to me. Hard to believe that color would settle down close to 2150. I am going back to the same paint store next week to continue the experiment with the 71310. I want to catch them on a slow day. I will post more pics then, I just got all jammed up this week.

scott#2



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Cliff Neubauer

07-21-2005 12:22:17




Report to Moderator
 Re: IH red, continued... in reply to scott#2, 07-20-2005 19:39:54  
third party image

Here is that same tractor a couple weeks later after it was finished in sunlight and it doesn't have the orange tint to it. I don't know why that paint looked orange at first but maybe it was just the light.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
scott#2

07-21-2005 17:40:45




Report to Moderator
 Re: IH red, continued... in reply to Cliff Neubauer, 07-21-2005 12:22:17  
That looks about right to me. Great looking machine Cliff. Your beginning to restore my faith in 71310.

scott#2



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
CNKS

07-20-2005 19:52:32




Report to Moderator
 Re: IH red, continued... in reply to scott#2, 07-20-2005 19:39:54  
The reflection of light off of the cast parts makes them look more orange than the sheet metal, but with that much orange, the sheet metal had to be significantly orange also. I notice Cliff has incadescent lights, I have fluorescent, really orange under those. I believe Cliff farms with his tractors. Sunlight will darken them, somewhat. Good luck with your experiment. I have a feeling that this whole thing depends on whether the individual toners are mixed before using.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
scott#2

07-20-2005 20:40:43




Report to Moderator
 Re: IH red, continued... in reply to CNKS, 07-20-2005 19:52:32  
CNKS,

Exactly what Im thinking, we will find out next week and maybey this whole thing will be resolved.

scott#2



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
CNKS

07-20-2005 12:15:23




Report to Moderator
 Re: IH red, continued... in reply to Cliff Neubauer, 07-20-2005 10:56:58  
Thanks for the picture -- that's about the color I got on my Super H, the C I painted earlier was darker, two different batches of paint a year apart. My dealer has a lot of turnover, I think paint is secondary to them. I also don't know if they keep their toners mixed right. The employee they have now appears to be more knowledgeable. I'm remotely considering Concept, but they can mess that up too. I may try mail order, assuming that they do enough business to keep their toners mixed and are careful mixing -- I don't know.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Rod (NH)

07-18-2005 15:44:43




Report to Moderator
 Re: IH red, continued... in reply to CNKS, 07-18-2005 13:38:10  
Here's Cliff's post from a while back showing his 71310 OMNI. I don't notice any orange tint in his. Assuming thorough stirring and not leaving any pigment in the bottom of the can, I sure would look to the individuals/vendors that are mixing your paints. The formula in the same line and chemistry should use the same mixing tints in the same relative quantities everywhere. The variables (I think) are how well the tints are kept stirred at the jobbers and how much care the guy preparing the mix takes in being precise. I would think that most jobbers nowadays whose mainstay business is local autobody shops would have computerized mixing equipment that eliminates or at least minimizes the effect of a person being sloppy. But that may not be true for the small-time outfits. I wouldn't expect OMNI to be a line of choice for predominantly collision repair work - just the lower-end overalls. If OMNI is a relative slow mover to a jobber, he may not take care to keep the tints well mixed. If that's the case, even the most careful guy doing the measurements could be off significantly in the final intended result. I think you have said before CN, that there is no other PPG jobber convenient to you. Scott, however, might want to consider another jobber if that is feasible for him.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
scott#2

07-18-2005 17:52:47




Report to Moderator
 Re: IH red, continued... in reply to Rod (NH), 07-18-2005 15:44:43  
Thanks CNKS, Thanks Rod,

Cliffs tractor looks about right to me. Ive gotten pretty chummy with the guys at PPG here.

I find it hard to believe that PPGs 71310 is intentionally formulated to put out that orange tint.

Im going to go back and have them mix a precise sample again and have them stir or shake the cans before pouring them in. That might be the whole problem with 71310. No one buys it, the tints probably sit on the shelf motionless for a good amount of time. In fact, when he went to mix me that sample, he was out of a tint and had to go get a new can. He just opened it up, screwed on the pourer and put it in. Who knows how long that has been sitting and if memory server, I beleive it was the first tint, red. (mabey wishful thinking)

Now, how to convince these guys to remove the pouring lids and stir or shake those tints, Im going to have to think about that one. Boy if anyone can ever beat something into the ground...I CAN.

Failing that I will try getting 2150 matched in omni if I can find any around here.

Anyone looking for an in depth IH Color discussion on this forum, will find none better than right here. Thanks for the education Rod, CNKS. It is priceless to me. Will keep you posted.

scott#2

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Rod (NH)

07-18-2005 19:29:45




Report to Moderator
 Re: IH red, continued... in reply to scott#2, 07-18-2005 17:52:47  
"In fact, when he went to mix me that sample, he was out of a tint and had to go get a new can. He just opened it up, screwed on the pourer and put it in."

Hmmm...sounds like a poor practice to me. I've never mixed any paint but have noticed a jobber do it in the past when the mixing rack(s) were basically in sight of the customer. The racks that I recall had 20 or so cans (usually gallons) on a rack that looked something like this:
third party image
All cans were automatically and simultaneously stirred by a motorized, gang type stirring mechanism. The cans of tints had their covers replaced by stirring devices with built-in pouring spouts. Those devices looked something like this:
third party image
When I wanted a custom mix made up while I waited, the paint person would start up the power mixing mechanism and after a couple minutes, pull one of the tints off the rack and pour the appropriate amount. That was duplicated for each of the remaining tints until complete. This was a place that had a fairly high turnover supplying most of the local bodyshops. They were a large autoparts house, but their paint sales (both PPG and DuPont products) had a dedicated paint service counter and a dedicated paint person at each of their several satellite stores around NH. If that person was not there, there would be no paint mixed, period. It was basically a paint store within a parts store - and still is.

I certainly would not expect someone to just open up a new can of paint without some type of stirring effort and begin using it in a mix. Any paint store worth its' salt that sells factory mixed house paint will at least put a new can in a shaker for a couple of minutes before selling it to you. I hope Frank Stalfire sees this thread and comments on current practice by jobbers. This type of thing shouldn't make any difference whether it's DuPont, PPG or anyone else. The place I go now does all the mixing behind closed doors and I don't get a chance to see what's going on. I can't imagine it's grossly different except for a possibly more computerized operation.

You shouldn't have to try and convince the store to make sure the ingredients are properly stirred - jeez, that seems so basic. Are you sure there's not another PPG jobber near you? You can search on the PPG website by zipcode. You might be surprised.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
scott#2

07-19-2005 04:18:45




Report to Moderator
 Re: IH red, continued... in reply to Rod (NH), 07-18-2005 19:29:45  
There is another dealer up the road, about 35 miles though. This store does have the stirring rack you have pictured but it makes me wonder if they even use it. I was there for about 3 hours (trying to get an education and 2 other people in front of me getting paint) and I never heard or saw the thing stirring. I guess its possible that they stir in the morning and then mix off that one stir all day long. I left there at closing time so if thats the case it would have been 6 hours between the stir and the mix. Im going to go back up there at their opening time and get another sample or 2 (1 standard mix and 1 with less orange). I'll see if they stir at all, should be interesting.

scott#2

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
CNKS

07-18-2005 17:36:08




Report to Moderator
 Re: IH red, continued... in reply to Rod (NH), 07-18-2005 15:44:43  
I don't know how much business my dealer does. I do know of at least one, probably more, body shops that mixes it's own paint -- he uses BASF, has used it for 20 years and swears by it. Cannot be told from factory paint, from the work he has done for me. There are several smaller shops who buy paint at my dealer and at the only other dealer, DuPont. Looking at the amounts of toner that go into a gallon of 71310, 1184 g red and 688.4 g orange, it seems to me that it would take a gross error to make as much difference as I have seen. I wonder if the toners are indeed settling out or something -- but I think the manager has enough sense to prevent that -- I don't know. Both sell a lot more auto parts than paint. I wish I could afford to mix my own paint, but the price of the toners and the base that you add them to would be completely prohibitive for the small amount of painting I do. Unless I could keep them mixed and preserve them for several years. (I'm 4 tractors behind right now, I can buy them a lot faster than I can keep up with them). A balance (scale) that weighs to 0.1 g is only $2-$300. Mixing is not rocket science. I have weighed literally thousands of samples during my former career. The idea is not practical -- just wish I had a reliable dealer. I have considered mail order, I suppose the hazardous shipping fees makes that impractical. Thanks for the picture, I remember it now.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy