Bigmotors - I would have to disagree with you on your point about not being able to run water and the sleeves needing support. Adding hard block for these (or any) reasons is only putting a band-aid on a problem, IMO. These problems can be solved with some creative engineering, which is what separates good engines from great engines. My problem with hard block is that it deems the engine to a "limited" life. The expansion and contraction rate of the sleeves is not the same as the concrete (hard block), so after X number of thermo-cycles, the hard block will loosen its "grip" on the sleeve. At that time, you will most likely start seeing water in the oil and congruently the hard block will no longer be "supporting" the sleeves, without sleeve deflection. It is then time to break out the Water Glass! The other problem that I have seen with hard block is when it is filled to within approximately an inch of the top of the block (just enough room to circulate water, it creates a stress concentration in a ring around the cylinder. I have witnessed sleeves cracking around their circumference at a height exactly coinciding where the hard block was stopped. That is why I do not use, nor believe in the value of "hard blocking" a tractor engine. Race car engine blocks (ie: 350 Chevy) are parent metal bore, with considerably thinner sleeve walls which MIGHT need the support of hard block. But if the hard block pulls away from the "sleeve" of a drag motor, there isn't going to be water in the oil. In addition, a 350 Chevy blocks, for example, are "a dime a dozen." So if something goes wrong, you are only out $150.00. This is not a flaming post! I am just merely presenting the other side of the hard block issue. Your use of hard block is a personal choice, but others need to know the "whole" story. Regards, Goldsburg goldsburg@att.net
|