Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo Auction Link (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Tool Talk Discussion Forum

sub panel in remote building, bond neutral to grou

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
buickanddeere

04-19-2005 20:02:08




Report to Moderator

Sorry I think I had my "wires crossed" reguarding the neutral/ground bond in a sub/pony panel. If the ground wire is run from the main panel along with the line(s) and neutral. No ground rod is required at the sub panel. And the neutral to ground bond must be open in the sub panel. If no ground wire is run with the line(s) and neutral from the main panel to the sub panel. Then a local ground rod is required at the sub panel. And the neutral to ground bond is kept in the sub panel.

[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
Kevin Bismark

04-21-2005 18:34:01




Report to Moderator
 Re: sub panel in remote building, bond neutral to in reply to buickanddeere, 04-19-2005 20:02:08  
3 or 4 wires, if there is any metalic connection between the 2 buildings at all then you have to use 4 wires, cable TV, phone, water pipes, gas pipes, I usually just run 4 and then don"t have to worry about it, no matter what you do a ground rod (2 would be better) will be required as it is a seperate building the panel you have most likely has a main breaker so that can be the service disconect, I try not to use the 6 switch rule unless it"s really big expensive equipment, other than that if there are 3 wires you do the neutral ground bond connection, and if there are 4 you never do, so if you wanted a sub panel in your house, the sub panel is in the same building, so you would not have to pound a ground rod of course, and you would use 4 wires and would not bond the neutral and ground together, remember, thou shalt bond the service once and only once. This deal about the metal connection between buildings may not sound imporntant but had a service call at a place years ago, and they had a 3 wire going to a building with a metal gas line, had a real bad neutral connection, and the equipment ground on the furnace burned off when the guy was in the garage, and couldn"t figure out how that was possible, because he said that the breaker on the furnace was off, so think about it, you have a 3 wire, neutral and ground bonded in the garage, now a bad neutral connection back to the panel in the house, and now the neutral connection is trying to return to the transformer back through the equipment ground going to the furnace and then through the copper gas line to the house, and from the equipment ground on the furnace in the house to the main panel and back to the transformer think he only broke down and called us because he had tools burning up in his garage from the imbalance when he tried to use them..

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Easy

04-20-2005 22:15:26




Report to Moderator
 Re: sub panel in remote building, bond neutral to in reply to buickanddeere, 04-19-2005 20:02:08  
In my barn, I have a 50 amp subpanel, 4 wire feed ( #6 wire ) and 2 ground rods. I did the wiring myself and then paid an electrician to do the final hookup to the main service panel, and check my work. He charged me for 4 hours. Money well spent IMHO. Easy.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
dr.sportster

04-20-2005 06:15:46




Report to Moderator
 Re: sub panel in remote building, bond neutral to in reply to buickanddeere, 04-19-2005 20:02:08  
I beleive a ground must always be run to a sub panel.Rods should only be from the main panel.All grounding should be "targeted" to the main panel.Sub panels should not have a ground rod.The bonding screw should not be installed in the sub panel.Different inspectors have different ideas about whats correct.My info is from a grounding book and what local inspectors will accept.To test the rod run a wire off a breaker to the rod place amprobe around wire for reading then turn on the breaker and use the amp reading and ohms law to calculate the resitance of the rod.Extra rods are required due to dry soil conditions in some areas.EC&M magazine had an article last month about electrocutions caused by ground rods driven, used incoorectly,at light poles.Instead of tripping the breaker back at the panel the rod electrified the earth around the light pole base causing electrocution hazard to anyone in contact with the pole and kneeling on the earth.Like a troubleshooting electrician.Of coures there would have to be a hot wire touching inside the pole.Im not trying to argue with anyone just talking about accepted practice in my area.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
nwb

04-20-2005 16:21:27




Report to Moderator
 Re: sub panel in remote building, bond neutral to in reply to dr.sportster, 04-20-2005 06:15:46  
I need to ask about EC&M. My subscription ran out over a year ago and I have never been able to get it again. I thought they went out of business. My boss at work quit receiveing it about the same time. Can you give me any information on a subscription?



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
nwb

04-20-2005 16:56:55




Report to Moderator
 Re: sub panel in remote building, bond neutral to in reply to nwb, 04-20-2005 16:21:27  
Dr. Sportster, I just got off line subscribing to EC&M. Thanks for mentioning it and reminding me of it. It was always one of my favorite magazines.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
dr.sportster

04-20-2005 17:53:51




Report to Moderator
 Re: sub panel in remote building, bond neutral to in reply to nwb, 04-20-2005 16:56:55  
I like the mysterious electrocution column.Lots of stange ways for electricity to get you.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
MarkB_MI

04-20-2005 03:15:44




Report to Moderator
 Re: sub panel in remote building, bond neutral to in reply to buickanddeere, 04-19-2005 20:02:08  
I went through this when I built my shop. The local inspector required that I:

1. Run separate ground and neutral from the service disconnect to the building.

2. Install two ground rods at the building.

3. Bond my two yard hydrants at the building to the electrical grounds.

I thought this was overkill, but I checked the code and confirmed that both the separate ground wire and the ground rods are required. I also thought that the two yard hydrants should have been more than enough ground, but I added ground rods to make the inspector happy.

Now I think the requirement is different with a panel and subpanel, but in my case (service disconnect at the meter and panel in the outbuilding) that's what code requires.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
FarmerDave

04-19-2005 20:22:54




Report to Moderator
 Re: sub panel in remote building, bond neutral to in reply to buickanddeere, 04-19-2005 20:02:08  
Can a well casing replace the ground rod at the sub-panel? Can I ease up on the gauge of the EGC between the panel and the sub: like cut 6 to 8 or 10?



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Farmall_Ryan

04-20-2005 07:08:18




Report to Moderator
 Re: sub panel in remote building, bond neutral to in reply to FarmerDave, 04-19-2005 20:22:54  
Dave, according to 250.52(A)(1) of the 2005 NEC the well casing can be used as the grounding electrode if it meets the criteria.

250.52(A)(1) "A metal underground water pipe in direct contact with the earth for 3.0 m or more (including any well casing effectively bonded to the pipe) and electrically continuous (or made electrically continuous by bonding around insulating joints or insulating pipe) to the points of connection of the grounding electrode conductor and the bonding conductors. Interior metal water piping located more than 1.52 m from the point of entrance to the building shall not be used as a part of the grounding electrode system or as a conductor to interconnect electrodes that are part of the grounding electrode system."

According to table 250.66 from the 2005 NEC, if your largest ungrounded service entrance conductor or equivalent area for parallel conductors is copper 2 AWG or smaller, then the GEC should be copper 8 AWG. If the ungrounded conductor/s are 1 or 1/0 then the GEC should be 6 AWG.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
dr.sportster

04-20-2005 06:34:06




Report to Moderator
 Re: sub panel in remote building, bond neutral to in reply to FarmerDave, 04-19-2005 20:22:54  
You would have to state the size of conductors feeding the subpanel and the overcurrent device to have a correct answer.Wires in a raceway on a 100 amp breaker call for 8cu ground conductor.It used to be tables 250-94 and 250-95.I got that from the Uglys book.I always said never trust the Uglys use the codebook,which I cant find right now.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
buickanddeere

04-20-2005 07:06:18




Report to Moderator
 Re: sub panel in remote building, bond neutral to in reply to dr.sportster, 04-20-2005 06:34:06  
Around here #8 ground is OK one any service of 100amps or less. If the ground wire is run inside a conduit. #6 bare ground wire is fine without a conduit. I spoke with the inspector yesterday. Generators are not to have the ground bonded to the neutral if it's used to supply a service through a transfer switch. If the generator is used portable by plug in equipment. The neutral is to be bonded to the ground/chassis. And the chassis fastened to a suitable ground rod. Generator transfer switches for services are to be three or four pole and switch the neutral as well as the two or three lines. Yes the inspector said if you pull a ground in with the line(s) and neutral to the remote sub panel. A ground rod is required at the remote sub panel. The neutral to ground bond in the sub panel must be open. If the ground wire is not pulled from the service panel to the sub panel. The sub panel again requires a ground rod. And the neutral is to remain bonded to the ground from both the service panel and local ground rod. A well caseing with a proper lug and a wad of "never seize" to prvent corrosion is excellent. The ground is mainly lightening protection. So sharp kinks and turns should be avoided. The protection to trip a breaker under a short circuit fault. Is via the fault current flowing to the equipment,chassis or building ground. Then back through to the service transformers center tap via the gound/neutral bond in the service panel.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
dr.sportster

04-20-2005 07:49:57




Report to Moderator
 Re: sub panel in remote building, bond neutral to in reply to buickanddeere, 04-20-2005 07:06:18  
Buick, How can you run to a sub panel without a grounding conductor?This would cause the exact hazard in the EC&M article:subpanel only grounded to incorrect rod at outer building,now a hot wire becomes loose electrifying the box and the rod and surrounding earth with nothing to operate the overcurrent protection in the main panel.This is the situation where kneeling on the "hot" earth and touching metal will electrocute you.Again not trying to argue.But what do you think?

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
buickanddeere

04-20-2005 10:57:45




Report to Moderator
 Re: sub panel in remote building, bond neutral to in reply to dr.sportster, 04-20-2005 07:49:57  
When the sub panel is fed without a ground wire from the service panel. Two 10 ft ground rods, appropriate ground plate(s), connection to well casing or a bare cable laid in a trench running to the sub panel. Any faults to ground from a sub panel circuit travel back to the ground/neutral bond in the sub panel. Then out to the service trans neutral. The inspector confirmed that most grounds attached to service panels. Have 10's to 100's of ohms resistance to "true earth". Dry ground, frost or rock make getting a low impedance path to true earth difficuilt. The primary functions of the ground rod is provide a path to true earth for lightening strikes. This keeps the line(s) voltage down as well as they are tied to the neutral/ground bond through the trans windings. The other function is to keep the secondary side/neutral of the transformer from being isolated and floating more than 10 Volts above earth potential. Fault protection from an E.G. a grounded/failed motor winding to case. Is through the motor's supply cable ground wire and back to the sub panel ground/neutral bond. Wouldn't make any difference to the breaker tripping if there was any earth connections to the ground circuit. For personal protection, either/both of the ground's earth connection(s) will keep the failed motor's casing close to true earth potential should the fault current not be enough to trip the breaker. But have the motor casing energized and dangerous to personal breaker

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Ken Macfarlane

04-20-2005 10:55:43




Report to Moderator
 Re: sub panel in remote building, bond neutral to in reply to dr.sportster, 04-20-2005 07:49:57  
Locally you have to choose between running the ground wire to the sub or using a grounding rod. Using both can cause a current flow to start in the grounding wire from difference in earth potential.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Gary Schafer

04-20-2005 12:57:54




Report to Moderator
 Re: sub panel in remote building, bond neutral to in reply to Ken Macfarlane, 04-20-2005 10:55:43  
It is my understanding that if a sub panel is used in the same building, then the ground and neutral are not to be bonded in the sub panel. A ground wire is to be run from the main panel to the sub panel.

If the sub panel is located in a detached building from where the main panel is, then local ground rods are to be installed at the sub panel and the neutral to ground bond is to be connected in the sub panel. No ground wire run from main to sub panel. I think in this case the sub panel should also have it's own main breaker in it.

If there are any other metallic connections between buildings, like a water line, then a separate ground wire is supposed to be run and the neutral to ground bond is not to be made at the sub panel. All water lines etc. are supposed to be bonded to the ground system even if you have ground rods installed as the main ground.

I have seen different versions of interpretations on this where there are water lines etc. running to the remote building.

It doesn't make a lot of sense though as you kind of get into the same situation as two houses being fed from the same utility transformer. Only difference is where the main breaker resides.

The reason you normally don't want the neutral bonded at both panels and a ground wire run between them is that neutral currents will then be carried by both the neutral wire and the ground wire between the panels if both bond connections are made.

The ground wire should never carry current except for fault current.

Regards
Gary

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
david - OR

04-20-2005 13:18:28




Report to Moderator
 Re: sub panel in remote building, bond neutral to in reply to Gary Schafer, 04-20-2005 12:57:54  
Detached buildings typically are required to have a service disconnect means, a grounding electrode system, and arrangements for bonding.

These are issues which are largely independent of whether the building is supplied with three wires or four wires.

In my opinion, the "right" way to supply a subpanel in a remote building is with 4 wires. Keep the equipment grounding conductor separate from the neutral. Size the conductor in accordance with the breaker protecting the branch circuit conductors. Do not bond the ground to the neutral in the remote panel. Add a grounding electrode system to support the remote building, and bond it to the equipment grounding conductor feeding the subpanel. The service disconnect can be a main breaker in the subpanel, a back-fed breaker, or you can use the "6 motions of the hand" exception in some cases. An alternative in some cases is to use the breaker protecting the branch circuit coming from the main panel as the service disconnect means for the remote building. There are rules for "readily accessible" and/or "in sight" that apply to this latter option.

The code allows a remote building to be supplied with only 3 wires in some cases. In this case the ground and neutral must be tied in the subpanel. I consider this a substandard installation; it is certainly not required.

The grounding, bonding, and service disconnect arrangements are required either way you do it.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
buickanddeere

04-20-2005 20:31:54




Report to Moderator
 Re: sub panel in remote building, bond neutral to in reply to david - OR, 04-20-2005 13:18:28  
Six motions of the hand? Never heard of that up here. Tougher to do wearing mittens 10 months of the year I guess. Around here every building is to have one isolation point that one motion will isolate the who building. Only exception is huge buildings such as auto assembly plants.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy