Read that after I posted, I remember the residential applications having problems, I think the dryvit system was a good one, but if the design of the building it's being used on is not sound, whereas moisture protection, drainage, weep systems, flashings are not high priority or do not work well with the building, and are not coordinated into the buildings thermal and moisture barriers properly, as well maintaining quality workmanship while installing system per the design documents, there can be lots of room for problems and or failure of the material systems used no matter what material it is or who manufacturers it. I've been on some large E.I.F.S. jobs, heavy commercial type panels constructed of galvanized metal studs with an EIFS system applied to foam, dense glass gypsum board and cementitious board. The panelized systems work, as by design there is a cavity and weep system. The field applied to the sheet goods as mentioned above would be more prone to delamination, but Dryvit was a good product, their primus base coat is polymer based, excellent bond strength, I recall the elastomeric finishes being good, being installed by experienced people helps too.
Portland Cement based materials are usually superior materials, I think you would have to compare ASTM tests and or specifications to see this.
One thing I would never allow on any structural steel buildings I did, and even NY state design and construction disallowed it in there specifications, was gypsum based sprayed on fireproofing used to give the steel frame ratings called for in the drawings and spec's for the job. Portland based fireproofing was much better. The reason was, that gypsum based fireproofing was too easily compromised, it's a weaker material, it would take a beating before it got covered up and floors finished during construction, too much would get knocked off, weather, all kinds of trades attaching their work to the steel scraping areas off that would cause the surrounding areas to fall off, lots of comeback work, re-applying the material would be necessary to insure the fire ratings of the steel were maintained per UL design. Portland based products cost more, but hold up better with this fireproofing material and probably most others like stucco. Compressive strength adhesion/bond strength, impact specs would probably be better if it's made with portland cement. I remember a material supplier attempting to get to me when I was doing state correctional facility work, he wanted to sell that gypsum based material to the general contractors like no tomorrow, just by the fact he got past all the barriers and finally got to me, knowing I approved/rejected materials for these jobs, he gave it the old college try, no deal though, substandard material and it violated the spec's for the job.
|