Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo Auction Link (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Tractor Talk Discussion Forum

wheatland models

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
utupuller

03-03-2008 15:06:47




Report to Moderator

Can someone please tell me the difference between a standard tread and a wheatland model if there are any difference's.




[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
higgins

03-04-2008 08:46:04




Report to Moderator
 Re: wheatland models in reply to utupuller, 03-03-2008 15:06:47  
Really the same thing. Old manuals called them standard. Wheatland came into being through someone trying to sound fancy. Both refer to wide front end that was attached so the whole axle shaft turned at the center post rather than the wheels having their own pivot points. Out in the big wheat growing areas the fields were so big that they only turned rarely and this setup was cheaper.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
massey333

03-04-2008 06:51:46




Report to Moderator
 Re: wheatland models in reply to utupuller, 03-03-2008 15:06:47  
There is no correct answer to Standard vs Wheatland because every Manf.had his own version.Some only made one version,others made several(Standard Tread,Rice,Western,Wheatland)All based on the same tractor,but had Different Wheel(tire)sizes,Clutches(hand vs Foot),diff fender Configurations and some even offered adjustable tread spacings,but still built on the low 4 wheel Configuration frame base.John Deere built I believe 4 or 5 diff.Standard tread 4010s,we had a4010 Standard with adj.tread width that didn't look anything like the wide front Row Crops.So there is no correct or wrong answer to the Standard vs.Wheatland.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Zach from TX

03-03-2008 16:40:09




Report to Moderator
 Re: wheatland models in reply to utupuller, 03-03-2008 15:06:47  
just different names for the same type of tractor. Large heavy generally higher horsepower tractors designed to pull. I have a GB Moline, a Case LA and a JD D. They are all similiar as far as design.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
utupuller

03-03-2008 16:37:31




Report to Moderator
 now let me ask this in reply to utupuller, 03-03-2008 15:06:47  
I am a stock antique tractor puller, in classes under 7500 you see very few standards. Wouldn't it be safe to assume that a standard should out pull a row crop?



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
buickanddeere

03-03-2008 17:40:38




Report to Moderator
 Re: now let me ask this in reply to utupuller, 03-03-2008 16:37:31  
A tall narrow tire such as a 15.5X38 on hard surfaces such as a puling track will out pull a 23.1X26. Out in the field with loose soil. The wheatland/standard"s 23.1X26 will outpull the 15.5X38. The 23.1X26 will ride smoother too.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
buickanddeere

03-03-2008 17:40:37




Report to Moderator
 Re: now let me ask this in reply to utupuller, 03-03-2008 16:37:31  
A tall narrow tire such as a 15.5X38 on hard surfaces such as a puling track will out pull a 23.1X26. Out in the field with loose soil. The wheatland/standard"s 23.1X26 will outpull the 15.5X38. The 23.1X26 will ride smoother too.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
55 50

03-03-2008 17:18:56




Report to Moderator
 Re: now let me ask this in reply to utupuller, 03-03-2008 16:37:31  
No that"s not a fair assupmtion. If the tractors are indeed in the same weight class, there should be very little difference (maybe no difference) between a standard and a row-crop for pulling ability.

I agree with one of the other posters here that there is no difference between a so
called "wheatland" and a "standard". In terms of the "titles", a lot depends on what part of the country you are and a person"s preferences. I don"t like the term wheatland, because many of the STANDARDS (which is what they really are) are used (or were used) in areas where little or no wheat (or other small grain) is raised. Standard is the much-preferred title (at least to me!) as it carry"s a much broader meaning.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
LenND

03-03-2008 18:24:19




Report to Moderator
 Re: now let me ask this in reply to 55 50, 03-03-2008 17:18:56  
Some of the salesmen and auctioneers here used to call the older IHC W9's Wheatland because they came from factory with a hand clutch and tires that were different than normal tractor.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
utupuller

03-03-2008 16:33:40




Report to Moderator
 Re: wheatland models in reply to utupuller, 03-03-2008 15:06:47  
Asking about the tractors



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Walt davies

03-03-2008 16:30:55




Report to Moderator
 Re: wheatland models in reply to utupuller, 03-03-2008 15:06:47  
This is my old Wheatland tractor. But are you asking about the tires or the tractor.
Walt

third party image

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Jon Hagen

03-03-2008 16:21:05




Report to Moderator
 Re: wheatland models in reply to utupuller, 03-03-2008 15:06:47  
In the high desert, prairie pothole region of ND, the wheatland tractor was the norm and the row crop was the rare oddball, except for the red river valley area.
Most wheatland tractors are low to the ground, with a low, non adjustable wide front axle, rear tred is non adjustable, and rear fenders are wide with nearly the top 180 degrees of the wheel covered to block dust and dirt. The draw bars are usually the wide swing roller variety, with a 3 pt being very rare. Mounted or semi mounted impliments were never popular here except for the little AC tractors.

When row crops like sunflower became popular in the 70's, many fabrication shops did a good business making add on 3 pt hitches and the machinery jockeys imported semi loads of used row crop tractors from the row crop states. Now with the roundup ready row crops, no one cultivates, so row crop tractors are again not much in demand.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
ken in texas

03-03-2008 15:33:39




Report to Moderator
 Re: wheatland models in reply to utupuller, 03-03-2008 15:06:47  
oops missread the question..... ..



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
RN

03-03-2008 15:21:45




Report to Moderator
 Re: wheatland models in reply to utupuller, 03-03-2008 15:06:47  
Depends somewhat on manufacturer- IHC general terms: Wheatland, old standard, or W models had wide front ends and lower frames, less ground clearance than Farmalls with tricle steering, high frames made to use a cultivator in row crop use. Ws meant to pull equipment, Farmalls often had other frame mounted equipment availabe, Frame sections had mounting holes various places. Other equipment could vary- PTO, Hydraulics, Pulleys, but was not really restricted to one or the other. RN

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
utupuller

03-03-2008 15:43:36




Report to Moderator
 Re: wheatland models in reply to RN, 03-03-2008 15:21:45  
So are wheatlands just a standard tread with IH lingo? Seems to me I have seen JD's and MM's with standard wheatland models and plan standard models.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
RN

03-03-2008 17:28:27




Report to Moderator
 Re: wheatland models in reply to utupuller, 03-03-2008 15:43:36  
Wheatland term seemed to be derived from W prefix of IHC which was the old standard tractor as compared to Farmall name/term. Wheatland model was a Moline or something else yellow- saw the wheatland decal on a big yellow thing at tractor show. Others have noted adjustable axles and wheels different on some others, I am mostly familiar with the IHC. As others noted the term wheatland tended to be used on large pullers, standard woulde be small to medium size- as a Ford 9N or AC B. Some wide fronts with adjustable axles and high clearance made for field work in 50s, 60s- the same engine in a lower frame would be termed Utility and be used with loaders and mounted equipment other than cultivators. RN

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
ken in texas

03-03-2008 15:19:51




Report to Moderator
 Re: wheatland models in reply to utupuller, 03-03-2008 15:06:47  
If I remember correctly,the wheatland has non adjustable front and real axels,and the rowcrop tractor s wheels will addjust in and out to match the row width.Does that sound right?? It,s been a long time for me.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy