Farmall & IHC Tractors Discussion Board |
An Alternative View
[ Expand ] [ View Replies ] [ Add a Reply ] [ Return to Forum ]
Posted by A. Bohemian on April 24, 2007 at 06:49:48 from (207.170.88.163):
In Reply to: Re: Farmall A Series Cylinder Compression Ratings posted by dunniteowl on April 23, 2007 at 20:12:48:
(Hal and Jim, don"t be afraid to contradict me. I will defer to your more extensive experience.) Dunnite, isn"t this the tractor that was spitting oil out the stack after you perhaps poured transmission fluid into the oil by mistake? Yes, this tractor will run with those readings. Someone (I forget whom) is fond of pointing out that they had a flat-head Ford V-8 that was winning races with 40 lbs. in each cylinder! But, in that famous instance, the compression was low but the differnce between cylinders was not great. I did the math, and came up with a seventeen percent difference between the highest and the lowest compression readings. That may be only marginally acceptable. The "wet" readings may be somewhat better. Compression testers are not completely accurate. And, a compression test itself is not the final authority. Nevertheless, it is my personal belief that if the gasket is now correctly installed, the valve train is functioning correctly, the plugs are all seated correctly, etc., and these are accurate readings, you are headed for a rebuild sooner or later. Also, you"ve named this tractor, which leads me to believe you are fond of it. If you don"t already know, delaying a rebuild by continuing to run a worn engine can lead to more extensive and expensive damage. Finally, there is a frustration factor. Again, the tractor will run with those readings. It may be quite hard to start, though. And, will it pull well enough to run a mower? You won"t know until you get it running and try; and my personal belief is that it will only pull well enough to cut thick or high grass if you make half a swath on each passage and stay in first or second gear. Very frustrating. If the cash is available, consider plunking it down for a rebuild now. If not, start saving. Hal? Jim?
Replies:
Home
| Forums
Today's Featured Article -
Tractor Profile: Farmall M - by Staff. H so that mountable implements were interchaneable. The Farmall M was most popular with large-acreage row-crop farmers. It was powered by either a high-compression gas engine or a distillate version with lower compression. Options included the Lift-All hydraulic system, a belt pulley, PTO, rubber tires, starter, lights and a swinging drawbar. It could be ordered in the high-crop, wide-front or tricycle configurations. The high-crop version was called a Model MV.
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
1964 I-H 140 tractor with cultivators and sidedresser. Starts and runs good. Asking 2650. CALL RON AT 502-319-1952
[More Ads]
Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V. Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor HeadquartersWebsite Accessibility Policy |
|