Re: Re: Re: Super M vs. IH 234

Posted by Bob M on January 20, 2003 at 18:23:59 from (66.66.123.133):

In Reply to: Re: Re: Super M vs. IH 234 posted by Tim Malin on January 20, 2003 at 16:51:16:

Tim - My father in law's 234 did not have the husking bed. Rather the corn was husked after it arrived at the freezer plant.

Our land is NOT flat - it's mostly glacial moraine with some river bottom. I never had the pleasure of running the Super M picker (only the PS-equipped 1650). But judging from the size of my father in law, manually steering the Super M outfit - especially on gravelly side hills - required outstanding upper body strength!

Note also the Super M had been "hot rodded" somewhat. I recall it dyno'd at 51 - 52 HP back then (vs 43 in it's stock form) and that was plenty to run the 234. ...Bob M

Follow Ups:

Post A Followup Name: E-Mail: Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Super M vs. IH 234 Comments: Optional Link URL: Link Title: Optional Image URL: Email Notification: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.

TRACTOR PARTS	TRACTOR MANUALS

We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]