Re: Re: Hydraulic Pressure H vs 300

Posted by Hugh MacKay on April 18, 2003 at 20:16:00 from (64.228.13.117):

In Reply to: Re: Hydraulic Pressure H vs 300 posted by Steven@nd on April 18, 2003 at 05:24:41:

Steven: I would question if the difference is any. On our farm we bought in order Farmalls H, 300, 560 and 656. The only one that ever matched the H for hydraulic lift was the 656. My dad had a loader on H from new. When he bought the 300 new, he wanted to change the same loader from H to 300 for the live hydraulics. The IH dealer spent countless hours trying to make that loader lift what it would on the H. It never happened.

The 560 and 656 never did have the same loader as we went to a 2000IH. 560 was no better than 300. 656 was only marginally better than the H. I should add that the 560 was 15 years old and 656 was 8 years old before a loader was on either.

Follow Ups:

Post A Followup Name: E-Mail: Subject: Re: Re: Re: Hydraulic Pressure H vs 300 Comments: Optional Link URL: Link Title: Optional Image URL: Email Notification: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.

TRACTOR PARTS	TRACTOR MANUALS

We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]