Farmall & IHC Tractors Discussion Board |
Re: Re: H Rebuild
[ Expand ] [ View Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Return to Forum ]
Posted by SCCA SOLO on July 24, 2003 at 17:20:55 from (208.51.55.188):
In Reply to: Re: H Rebuild posted by LanceM on July 24, 2003 at 16:39:16:
Lance, Good question. I think it would depend on what the stock volumetric efficiency is. If it could be significantly increased you should see a hp increase. Say the stock VE is 65% (guess) and you were able to increase the VE to 75% through porting and assuming the intake and exhaust can keep up with the flow increase you potentially could see a gain of 0.52lbs/min of airflow (Calc. done using 152cid, 1650RPM, 80F, 29.92 in Hg atmospheric press, and 50% relative humidity.) Using the rule of thumb I found of for every 1lb of air yields 10 hp (assuming proper amount of fuel is added) thats a 5hp gain from a cheap mod. I don't know what fuel density that rule uses. The lower the fuel density the higher the energy density, sound right to anyone? I have no idea what the ports look like in the H, its entirely possible that a gain in VE of 10% through porting the head of an H is entirely unrealistic. VE varies with RPM, I believe thats why different cams are used for different applications; to shift the highest VE to the RPM you will be using most often. I basically wanted to know where the bottleneck is, maybe the head flows fine and attention needs to go to the carb or manifold, I don't know. I've seen on other posts that people have put a head from a 350 or something in an effort to increase flow. No Idea what RPM's they were targeting or Compression. I am new to tractor engines, but I know quite a bit about auto engines. Same rules should apply or at least I hope so. I am not trying to be smart either, just trying to learn the most I can.
Follow Ups:
Home
| Forums
Today's Featured Article -
Choosin, Mounting and Using a Bush Hog Type Mower - by Francis Robinson. Looking around at my new neighbors, most of whom are city raised and have recently acquired their first mini-farms of five to fifteen acres and also from reading questions ask at various discussion sites on the web it is frighteningly apparent that a great many guys (and a few gals) are learning by trial and error and mostly error how to use a very dangerous piece of farm equipment. It is also very apparent that these folks are getting a lot of very poor and often very dangerous advice fro
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
1997 cub cadet 7275 compact utility tractor 4wd hydro trans cracked block 3500
[More Ads]
Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V. Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor HeadquartersWebsite Accessibility Policy |
|