Re: Re: Re: 1066,Good or not?

Posted by Leroy on January 30, 2004 at 15:38:53 from (65.245.188.14):

In Reply to: Re: Re: 1066,Good or not? posted by Hugh MacKay on January 30, 2004 at 14:16:23:

Hugh,

You seem pretty knowledgable so I really want to know your opinion. Please don't be offended by my ignorance. I simply don't understand what you mean. You've written a few times that it's no fault of the 1066 just the people at IH. I can't tell whether you think the tractor was good or the design flaw made it bad. I think you said the 66 series was comfortable but then said having more HP than the tractor was rated was one of the few things IH had going for it. Was the 66 series worth a darn or not?

Again I'm not meaning to question your knowledge I am just curious. I'm looking at buying a 966 with loader but if cavitation is caused by age and not necessarily the amount and kind of use then I'm more hesitant. These tractors are all getting close if not over 30 years old. Does that mean cavitation has already occurred so that they're already fixed?

Thanks for educating those out there that are ignorant like me.

Follow Ups:

• Re: Re: Re: Re: 1066,Good or not? Hugh MacKay 17:10:54 01/30/04 (0)

Post A Followup Name: E-Mail: Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: 1066,Good or not? Comments: Optional Link URL: Link Title: Optional Image URL: Email Notification: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.

TRACTOR PARTS	TRACTOR MANUALS

We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]