Farmall & IHC Tractors Discussion Board |
Re: making smaller tractors with more h.p these d
[ Expand ] [ View Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Return to Forum ]
Posted by Joe Evans on July 20, 2004 at 12:28:06 from (209.41.233.155):
In Reply to: making smaller tractors with more h.p these days. posted by Farmallkid on July 20, 2004 at 11:17:26:
Yes, new tractors are packing a lot of HP in smaller packages these days. Many advertise their HP using the flywheel or gross engine HP. I have a 1985 Kubota L275, while not a "new" machine, probably resides in the X generation of machines. It was sold to me as a 27.5 HP tractor--hence the 275 model number. The L275 was tested at Nebraska where they rate tractors at the PTO (in that era) and at the drawbar. The L275 registered 23 PTO HP during its test. That is a 16% drop off from the advertised figure, but 27.5 HP sounds better. I will flat guarantee you a Ford 8N will pull my Kubota (2WD) all over heck's half acre if the two were hitched together. The 8N is about 50% beefier. Something to consider with new tractors and maybe especially so with small to mid-sized units, and that is a lot of them do work where drawbar and PTO is not a consideration. There is a local Mahindra dealer with a number of tractors on his lot: dang few of them are not equipped with loaders. So flywheel HP is providing the hydraulic system breakout force AND the tractive effort of the chassis is providing the stockpile crowd force. In other words, these new tractors are called upon to do work besides dragging a disk or running a bat-wing mower thru the PTO. Another factor is that in the older days of two-wheel drive, the only tractive force was provided by the rear wheels, and to maximize that, additional weight was often added to the already substantial chassis heft. With the overall new tractors sold being 4-wheel drive and FWA, the same tractive force can be achieved with a relatively smaller tractor. One thing leads to another--a designer might say "this 4,000# 4WD chassis we've got can efficiently utilize a 50 HP mill", whereas years ago with 2WD, that engine figure might have been around 35.
Follow Ups:
Home
| Forums
Today's Featured Article -
Choosin, Mounting and Using a Bush Hog Type Mower - by Francis Robinson. Looking around at my new neighbors, most of whom are city raised and have recently acquired their first mini-farms of five to fifteen acres and also from reading questions ask at various discussion sites on the web it is frighteningly apparent that a great many guys (and a few gals) are learning by trial and error and mostly error how to use a very dangerous piece of farm equipment. It is also very apparent that these folks are getting a lot of very poor and often very dangerous advice fro
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
1997 cub cadet 7275 compact utility tractor 4wd hydro trans cracked block 3500
[More Ads]
Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V. Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor HeadquartersWebsite Accessibility Policy |
|