Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver
 
Marketplace
Classified Ads
Photo Ads
Tractor Parts
Salvage

Community
Discussion Forums
Project Journals
Your Stories
Events Calendar
Hauling Schedule

Galleries
Tractor Photos
Implement Photos
Vintage Photos
Help Identify
Parts & Pieces
Stuck & Troubled
Vintage Ads
Community Album
Photo Ad Archives

Research & Info
Articles
Tractor Registry
Tip of the Day
Safety Cartoons
Tractor Values
Serial Numbers
Tune-Up Guide
Paint Codes
List Prices
Production Nbrs
Tune-Up Specs
Torque Values
3-Point Specs
Glossary

Miscellaneous
Tractor Games
Just For Kids
Virtual Show
Museum Guide
Memorial Page
Feedback Form

Yesterday's Tractors Facebook Page

  
Farmall & IHC Tractors Discussion Board

Re: Farmall M--- Changing a narrow front to a wide


[ Expand ] [ View Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Return to Forum ]

Posted by Hugh MacKay on August 21, 2004 at 18:54:45 from (209.226.106.19):

In Reply to: Farmall M--- Changing a narrow front to a wide fro posted by A. D. Hyde on August 19, 2004 at 14:41:57:

A.D.: All that has been said about the wide front versus narrow front are good points. Narrow front tractors did have their place in our farming history. I think by now most of those good reasons for having one are also history.

In the heyday of the letter series Farmalls, wide fronts were rather cumbersom. They were often hard to steer, slow to steer and would not turn short enough. With the advent of power steering and different steering linkages all that changed.

I had both wide and narrow front for Farmall 300 when it was the main power source on the farm. In the years that tractor was around I rather doubt if wide front was on the tractor a total of 2 years. We then got a 560D wide front, with power steering, but the same steering linkage as on the SH, 300, SM, etc. It steered easier but still no shorter than the older ones. My next tractor was a 656D with wide front. By then IH had changed only the steering linkage on that basic front end, plus beefed up the power steering to handle the extra mechanical load of steering quicker and shorter.

My dad and I really liked the 300 with narrow front for baling hay, so much more manuverable than the 300 with wide front. First time my dad ever baled hay with the 560, his comment,"just like a locomotive and steers almost as quickly." My dad took the 656 one day baling hay, his comment," just as manuverable as my old 300 with narrow front." It was unbelieveable the difference the minor changes made between 560 and 656 wide fronts, made such a difference in steering. Those tractors are both 96" wheelbase, a full 6" longer than H, M, 300, etc. The only item on widefront IH changed between 560 and 656 was the center steering control arm. The 656 had more powerful power steering to handle the reduced mechanical advantage in steering. That center steering control arm is longer on the newer tractors.

I know if you put the longer center link on tractors without power steering it will make them harder to steer. Problem I can see with in doing this with an M, SM, 400, 450 or 560, is I doubt if factory or even aftermarket power steering for those tractors will handle the extra load. You may be able to find power steering units today with the power to do this.


Follow Ups:




Post a Followup

:
:

Subject:

:

:

:

:

: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Today's Featured Article - The Cletrac General GG and the BF Avery A - A Bit of History - by Mike Ballash. This article is a summary of what I have gathered up from various sources on the Gletrac General GG and the B. F. Avery model A tractors. I am quite sure that most of it is accurate. The General GG was made by the Cleveland Tractor Company (Cletrac) of Cleveland, Ohio. Originally the company was called the Cleveland Motor Plow Company which began in 1912, then the Cleveland Tractor Company (1917) and finally Cletrac. ... [Read Article]

Latest Ad: 1997 cub cadet 7275 compact utility tractor 4wd hydro trans cracked block 3500 [More Ads]

Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy