Farmall & IHC Tractors Discussion Board |
Re: McCormick vs IHC
[ Expand ] [ View Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Return to Forum ]
Posted by Guy Fay on August 22, 2004 at 13:57:49 from (169.207.193.81):
In Reply to: McCormick vs IHC posted by Don E. Foster` on August 22, 2004 at 08:39:45:
The name McCormick-Deering itself was born twenty years after IH was formed. IH was formed in 1902 as the other posters have indicated, the name McCormick-Deering began to be used in 1922 or thereabouts. After the merger that produced IH, the company kept the old McCormick, Deering, Plano, Milwaukee, and CHampion lines seperate, making five different binders, for instance, as a way of keeping external competition down and the government happy. The government still sued IH for anti-trust in 1913, and the case got settled in 1917. WIth the settlement of the case, IH could only have one dealer in each town, so the five different lines of equipment didn't make sense anymore. SO on many machines, they reduced down to one machine, either taking the best of the McCormick or Deerings (the other lines were sold off), or designing a new machine that used the best features of both. The new, single line of machinery used the McCormick-Deering name to keep the old customers satisfied. THe McCormick Deering name was used to abuot 1949, when the name for the farm equipment line was shortened to McCOrmick. It should be noted that overseas, the old company names were still used into the early 1950s in many circumstances, and even in the US, some McCormick and some Dearing equipment continued to be made under the seperate names until the late 1930s. As fas as IH equipment goes, McCormick-Deering is essentially only a name, similar to Chevrolet to GM- not a seperate company, although it once was, but a trade name.
Follow Ups:
Home
| Forums
Today's Featured Article -
Pitfalls of Tractor Engine Rebuilds - by Chris Pratt. The first pop after you have put the machine together with your own hands is exciting and pleasing. The whole experience can be marred if one moves too fast and makes too many assumptions that they can just use "as is" some parts they should be closely scrutinizing and possibly attended to. In such cases, rework makes what could have been a fun project turn into an irritant or even a nightmare. Minor Irritants To give you an example of an minor but irritating proble
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
1964 I-H 140 tractor with cultivators and sidedresser. Starts and runs good. Asking 2650. CALL RON AT 502-319-1952
[More Ads]
Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V. Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor HeadquartersWebsite Accessibility Policy |
|