Re: !956 IH 400 or not?

Posted by Hugh MacKay on January 07, 2006 at 16:47:26 from (209.226.106.154):

In Reply to: Re: !956 IH 400 or not? posted by DWV on January 07, 2006 at 16:08:44:

DWV: That is the kind of information it will take to solve this; serial numbers at time changes were made, part numbers, etc. I have a feeling someone thinks of me as the correctness police. That is so far from the truth it's laughable. He should come and see my tractors with alternators, etc., etc., etc. I just like to help folks solve exactly what they have. There is one item I wont tolerate and that is calling an A, C, H or M a Super. To call it other than it is, is fraud.

You mention the larger fuel tank, I had forgotten that one. Probably that is why my 560 had the manifolds at 90 degrees, to allow for more fuel tank space. Could be that we're both right. One thing these tractors all needed was more fuel tank.

Replies:

• Re: !956 IH 400 or not? John M 05:36:07 01/08/06 (1)
  • Re: !956 IH 400 or not? Hugh MacKay 05:53:33 01/08/06 (0)
• Re: !956 IH 400 or not? DWV 17:28:12 01/07/06 (0)

Add a Reply Name: E-Mail: Subject: Comments: Optional Link URL: Link Title: Optional Image URL: Email Notification: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.

TRACTOR PARTS	TRACTOR MANUALS

We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]