Re: H vs. 300 Weight...?

Posted by FatRedneck on March 05, 2006 at 15:25:59 from (64.12.116.65):

In Reply to: H vs. 300 Weight...? posted by Glenn FitzGerald on March 05, 2006 at 14:10:29:

i've seen that sign, it was a Farmall advertisement that tried to make the 300 seem more appealing over the H's people already owned. those specs werea bare 300 as in manual steer, solid hitch, zero hydraulics whatsoever. that h depicted was packed to the gills and had two sets of rear wheel weights. the 300 is a little more appealing to most people.

Replies:

Add a Reply Name: E-Mail: Subject: Comments: Optional Link URL: Link Title: Optional Image URL: Email Notification: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.

TRACTOR PARTS	TRACTOR MANUALS

We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]