Farmall & IHC Tractors Discussion Board |
Re: electronic ignition vs.points
[ Expand ] [ View Replies ] [ Add a Reply ] [ Return to Forum ]
Posted by John T on March 07, 2006 at 19:41:07 from (66.244.90.98):
In Reply to: electronic ignition vs.points posted by farmallmrestorer on March 07, 2006 at 13:52:02:
Farmall, an electronic ignition switch, ESPECIALLY when coupled up with a high energy coil, is capable of producing more spark energy discharge across a plug gap to better ignite the fuel. As far as pulling, its not so much the pulling but whether or not the engine is souped up with high compression which is where an elec ignition becomes necessary, since at high compression it takes more voltage to arc current across the plug gap which a stock ignition may not be capable of producing. i.e. thats when an elec ignition becomes almost a necessity. While an elec ignition even with a stock coil (due to faster and more positive switching) can provide improved performance, its the elec ignition PLUS the high energy coil that really gets you the most bang for the buck. If the pulling rules allow it, I would use BOTH. If the rules call for the use of stock points, theres not much gain from simply adding a high energy coil however. To answer one of your questions more directly, I dont forsee any circumstances (assuming the switch is working properly) where using corrosive and bouncing and ringing mechanical points as the coils current switch could be better then the use of an electronic faster and more positive switch. As far as any so called "hot plug" the heat range of a plug is a measure of its ability to transfer heat away from its firing tip and ground strap to the relatively cooler head or block. The "hot" has nuttin to do with the amount of energy expended across its gap or spark quality or intensity, its a function of thermodynamics and heat transfer. The "hot" refers to its operatign temperature NOT how strong or weak the spark is. To the contrary, when operatign at very high compressions and high octane fuels under extreme pulling loads and at high combustion chamber temperatures, it may become necessary to use a colder then normal spark plug. John T, retired electrical engineer in Indiana
Replies:
Home
| Forums
Today's Featured Article -
The Cletrac General GG and the BF Avery A - A Bit of History - by Mike Ballash. This article is a summary of what I have gathered up from various sources on the Gletrac General GG and the B. F. Avery model A tractors. I am quite sure that most of it is accurate. The General GG was made by the Cleveland Tractor Company (Cletrac) of Cleveland, Ohio. Originally the company was called the Cleveland Motor Plow Company which began in 1912, then the Cleveland Tractor Company (1917) and finally Cletrac.
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
1997 cub cadet 7275 compact utility tractor 4wd hydro trans cracked block 3500
[More Ads]
Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V. Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor HeadquartersWebsite Accessibility Policy |
|