Farmall & IHC Tractors Discussion Board |
Re: Tractor Vet or Somebody
[ Expand ] [ View Replies ] [ Add a Reply ] [ Return to Forum ]
Posted by Hugh MacKay on July 07, 2006 at 03:04:30 from (216.208.58.129):
In Reply to: Re: Tractor Vet or Somebody posted by Allan In NE on July 06, 2006 at 06:29:23:
Allan: I wouldn't get too awfully concerned about the 3 point being down with lever in up position. My 1066 did that from the day it was new, never got any worse and it saw a lot of hours, 10,000 in the first 8 years. Two complaints I've heard about 86 series are rough from operator being moved forward and a lot of folks had problems with shift linkage. A couple of 86 series tractors I have operated needed transmission brake adjusted. I always suspected that had more to do with hard shifting than the linkage. Then there are those folks that have to be shifting all the time, they didn't realize the Farmall had enough torque to run in the same gear all day using TA ocasionally. I had a farmer friend, had an 886 and one of the first CaseIH, actually a Case painted red. Forget the model number but it had 360 Cummins and supposedly rated about same as 886. I operated both on an 18' disk and he asked me to compare. I said' "it's good that the Case has 3 power shifts, as it has no torque. The Farmall would hike that disk along at 4 to 5 mph and never look at TA unless you wanted to slow down. In the same field with Case you hardly dared take hand off the power shift lever. On the roughness, I've never operated an 86 series long enough to experience this. I sometimes wonder if those folks may have had 60 lbs. air in front tires. and maybe excess in rear as well. If you going to be farming half of Western Nebraska, why not go out and buy yourself a real tractor, go articulated. Having had the experience of 1066, I'd never buy another two wheel drive tractor over 100 hp, or even conventional 4x4. These articulateds are smooth, they are very manuverable and traction plus with no added weight other than enough to balance load on both rear ends. Very important that each axle has about 50% of load with that kind of hp
Replies:
Home
| Forums
Today's Featured Article -
Harvestin Hay: The Early Years (Part 2) - by Pat Browning. The summer of 1950 was the start of a new era in farming for our family. I was thirteen, and Kathy (my oldest sister) was seven. At this age, I believed tractor farming was the only way, hot stuff -- and given a chance I probably would have used the tractor, Dad's first, a 1936 Model "A" John Deere, to go bring in the cows! And I think Dad was ready for some automation too. And so it was that we acquired a good, used J. I. Case, wire tie hay baler. In addition to a person to drive th
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
1997 cub cadet 7275 compact utility tractor 4wd hydro trans cracked block 3500
[More Ads]
Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V. Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor HeadquartersWebsite Accessibility Policy |
|