Farmall & IHC Tractors Discussion Board |
Re: real IH wide front end?
[ Expand ] [ View Replies ] [ Add a Reply ] [ Return to Forum ]
Posted by Hugh MacKay on August 08, 2006 at 02:49:51 from (216.208.58.183):
In Reply to: real IH wide front end? posted by Mike CA on August 08, 2006 at 00:04:20:
Mike: A photo will probably be the only sure way, however if your H has an original wide front the ty-rods will be out front of the axle. It will have a ty-rod from one side to the other, plus a drag link from the left side to the center, and hooked to the steering control arm. The Super H and any newer models all have ty-rods behind the axle. There may well be older type wide fronts on a lot of the newer tractors as there were a sizable number of these around dealers, as the Supers came on the market. Back in those days tractors were shipped to dealers via rail. IH could put more Cs, Hs and Ms on a rail flat car when equiped with narrow fronts. Wide fronts for a percentage of these were straped to rail car deck under tractors. At the end of H and M production just about every dealer found himself with a few extra wide fronts. A few of the new type front ends have made their way to Hs over the years. Also, all the aftermarket wide fronts have ty-rods behind the axle. Of the ones I've seen, only the IH wide front has the center that axle pivots on and bolts to tractor, made of cast. Don't be alarmed by the narrow front nay-sayers. Millions of narrow fronts were sold by the various companies. Are we to believe all those millions of farmers were wrong, and these few nay-sayers at YT are right, I hardly think so. These folks will try to tell you narrow front was specific to row crops. I can give you hundreds of example of farmers the bought these new and never grew a row crop. Farmers loved narrow front tractors on hay balers. I used my 300 nf on hay baler long after I had a 560D with wf, why, in spite of 560s power advantage, 300 was just as fast, because it was more manuverable. I even liked the 300 in the bush, around stumps, brush, etc. There are many factors why narrow front disappeared, imagined safety is only a small portion of the reason.
Replies:
Home
| Forums
Today's Featured Article -
Fabrication (Who Me? Make it myself?) - by Chris Pratt. First of all, what are the reasons for not fabricatin your own parts? Most judgements on what should be purchased rather than fabricated stem from: Originality - If the tractor restoration is to be 100% original, it is likely that you should spend the time and money to locate the component in the used or New-old-stock market. Since this can be extremely difficult, you may want to fabricate the item or purchase a modern replacement temporarily, but eventually, you s
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
1964 I-H 140 tractor with cultivators and sidedresser. Starts and runs good. Asking 2650. CALL RON AT 502-319-1952
[More Ads]
Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V. Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor HeadquartersWebsite Accessibility Policy |
|