Farmall & IHC Tractors Discussion Board |
Re: IH vs others
[ Expand ] [ View Replies ] [ Add a Reply ] [ Return to Forum ]
Posted by Andy Martin on September 06, 2006 at 05:26:08 from (64.219.39.195):
In Reply to: IH vs others posted by July on September 05, 2006 at 23:50:13:
My grandpa had an H and an M. My dad had an M. I like them because they sit up high and out of the dust and debris. Technically, Allis Chalmers was probably the best tractor in the thirties and forties. They definitely had the best implements. All the manufacturers in the twenties were just trying to make practical tractors. In the thirties they were trying to make them reliable. The engineers designing the farm tractors in the thirties had the same education as those designing the Duesenberg, Cord, B-17, V-16 Cadillac, etc. They are not low-tech. The move from a fuel pump on the F series to gravity with updraft carburetor on the letter series was an improvement I still appreciate every time I don't have to check for a bad fuel pump. You won't find a tractor designed in the thirties which had short cuts taken to make it cheaper. In the forties all the effort was going into increasing production. In the fifties the thrust was more horsepower and labor saving attachments for productivity. In the sixties cost savings crept in along with greater horsepower, and the cost savings took precedence in the seventies. I bale hay with M's and H's and they are still very reliable. We had a breakdown yesterday. Finally tracked it down to a broken spring on the points. I don't replace points just for exercise, but I guess these had gotten so old the spring fatigued in two. They probably have five years or more use and the tractor was still running well but getting a little slow to start, I'd been meaning to adjust the points. But all the tractors from the thirties (when the letter series Farmall's were designed) have similar reliability. The John Deeres are a bit out of step because you hardly ever see anyone actually farming with a two cylinder but even they are still reliable.
Replies:
Home
| Forums
Today's Featured Article -
Fabrication (Who Me? Make it myself?) - by Chris Pratt. First of all, what are the reasons for not fabricatin your own parts? Most judgements on what should be purchased rather than fabricated stem from: Originality - If the tractor restoration is to be 100% original, it is likely that you should spend the time and money to locate the component in the used or New-old-stock market. Since this can be extremely difficult, you may want to fabricate the item or purchase a modern replacement temporarily, but eventually, you s
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
1964 I-H 140 tractor with cultivators and sidedresser. Starts and runs good. Asking 2650. CALL RON AT 502-319-1952
[More Ads]
Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V. Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor HeadquartersWebsite Accessibility Policy |
|