Re: 33A Power Loader

Posted by Hugh MacKay on January 06, 2007 at 08:27:30 from (209.226.106.30):

In Reply to: Re: 33A Power Loader posted by Moki on January 06, 2007 at 07:43:59:

Moki: I'd go for that 34 loader, wee bit better engineering than the 33 or 33A. Back when they were mew 33 was designated as Farmall loader and 34 as a loader for Utilities, however with some modification the 34 will fit the Farmall.

My dad bought a new 33A loader in the 50s for his Farmall 300. It was the first and last 33A the dealer sold. Our loader caused him enough grief, they found ways to modify the 34 to fit Farmalls. Dad had a 31 loader before the 33A, and we couldn't get the 33A to lift like the old 31. 31 had been on an H with belly pump and 33A was on 300. They did make it lift a bit better but then the loader frame started breaking. Three years later we bought a Cockshutt 540 with a Wagner loader with front mounted pump. It freed the 300 up for field work and was much better loader tractor. That old 33A lay on top of a pile of steel roofing behind the barn, for a number of years. Dad said that was it's most useful function, during the time we owned it.

Replies:

Add a Reply Name: E-Mail: Subject: Comments: Optional Link URL: Link Title: Optional Image URL: Email Notification: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.

TRACTOR PARTS	TRACTOR MANUALS

We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]