Re: 300 loader on M?

Posted by Hugh MacKay on September 16, 2007 at 03:03:03 from (216.208.58.152):

In Reply to: 300 loader on M? posted by bnowen on September 15, 2007 at 20:58:45:

Billy: Another item I forgot to mention, my dad had a 33A loader on our 300 before I installed the Wagner. 33A was considered the Farmall loader and the U-34 was considered the utility loader. I forget the exact specs, however the U-34 had a considerably higher lift capacity than the 33A. A neighbor had a U-34 on his 350 Utility. The U-34 has a lot more steel in it than the 33A, and yes, what we saw way back in the 50s the U-34 would lift more than the 33A. That neighbor's son still has the 350 with U-34 loader. My 33A loader went to the scrap yard in mid 1960s. The Wagner would perform with the U-34.

I never could figure why manufacturers figured utility tractors could handle a higher capacity loader than a row crop, however they all did it up until the mid 70s. Personally I though the longer wheel base row crop would handle the extra weight best.

Replies:

Add a Reply Name: E-Mail: Subject: Comments: Optional Link URL: Link Title: Optional Image URL: Email Notification: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.

TRACTOR PARTS	TRACTOR MANUALS

We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]