Posted by Charles Todd on February 22, 2008 at 10:21:53 from (205.242.95.137):
Out of the Hydro models produced (HYDRO 70, 84, 85, 86, 100, 186, 268) were any of them good tractors? I work with a retired tractor mechanic and he says that they were a flop. Is there any truth to this?
I think it would be an interesting tractor to find and clean up to presentable standards. Were there many of them? Was it the loss of useable horsepower from the hydrostatic drive that gave them a bad rep or did they actually have issues? I do know that you give up 10-20+ drawbar HP over rated PTO HP.
We sell tractor parts! We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]
All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy
TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.
