Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver
 
Marketplace
Classified Ads
Photo Ads
Tractor Parts
Salvage

Community
Discussion Forums
Project Journals
Your Stories
Events Calendar
Hauling Schedule

Galleries
Tractor Photos
Implement Photos
Vintage Photos
Help Identify
Parts & Pieces
Stuck & Troubled
Vintage Ads
Community Album
Photo Ad Archives

Research & Info
Articles
Tractor Registry
Tip of the Day
Safety Cartoons
Tractor Values
Serial Numbers
Tune-Up Guide
Paint Codes
List Prices
Production Nbrs
Tune-Up Specs
Torque Values
3-Point Specs
Glossary

Miscellaneous
Tractor Games
Just For Kids
Virtual Show
Museum Guide
Memorial Page
Feedback Form

Yesterday's Tractors Facebook Page

  
Farmall & IHC Tractors Discussion Board

Re: CUB vs BN


[ Expand ] [ View Replies ] [ Add a Reply ] [ Return to Forum ]

Posted by ScottyHOMEy on November 14, 2008 at 10:30:42 from (71.241.193.150):

In Reply to: Re: CUB vs BN posted by old on November 14, 2008 at 09:04:08:

I get your point, but I think you've missed mine, and suffice to say we disagree on this one.

There have been many discussions around here of whether a wide front is any more stable than a narrow front, and for most tractors with a center of gravity along the center line, the WFE vs. NFE debate is usually worthwhle, if only because folks on both sides usually agree before they're done that the biggest safety factor lies between the ears of the operator, and go back to their corners without changing their minds.

My point is that any advantage to stability, if there is one, in a wide front is significantly compromised by the offset center of gravity of the Cubs and As. That's part of the reason for them having wide fronts--it provides a wider stance, thereby reducing the chance that the center of gravity (which is still left of center, even with the WFE) will move outside the vertical plane between the corners of the base(an imaginary line between the front and rear wheels on a given side), which is the point beyond which the tractor will tip over on its side under its own weight.

As for turns, yes, anybody, newbie or not, can get into trouble making too fast a turn with a narrow front end. But it can be done just as easily, and perhaps even more so, with a tractor whose center of gravity is offset to one side as in the As an Cubs, even with their WFEs. I know of an experienced Cub owner who got banged up pretty badly doing just that last summer with one of his Cubs, on level ground.

As far as operation on uneven ground, the same thing applies, and IH knew it. A LOT of those machines (As) were used for mowing roads, ditches and banks. It was apparent on tractors with steel wheels on both sides and no added weights, that the tractors were being operated on slopes leaning low enough to the left that the combined weight and torque of the longer right side, the operator on the right side, and the the mower on the right side, did not move the center of gravity sufficiently to the right to keep the tractors from becoming unstable or tipping to the left in those situations, even with the wider stance afforded by the WFE. I go back to the number of As delivered with steel wheels on the left and cast on the right, and will qualify my earlier assertion by saying that if IH didn't know it, the folks operating them certainly did, and ordered their As with the extra weight of the cast wheel on the right, which moved the COG both lower and to the right. That's just for the As. I don't have a sense that it's terribly common to add wheel weights to one side of a Cub to achieve the same effect.

99-44/100% of drivers' experience is in cars, trucks and motorcycles, all of which have a COG pretty much along the center line of the vehicle, so that COG never even enters their minds, unless they are driving something that is obviously top-heavy (and I've seen folks on the road who seem oblivious even to that).

My point is that I believe the offset COG of the As and Cubs presents a unique hazard that is outside the experience of and would not be recognized by most drivers, is inherently trickier to handle, and can get a newbie (or anybody else) into trouble quicker than any tractor (NFE or WFE) with the COG along the center line.

I'm up to a dime now! ;8^)


Replies:




Add a Reply

:
:
:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Advanced Posting Options

: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.



 
Advanced Posting Tools
  Upload Photo  Select Gallery Photo  Attach Serial # List 
Return to Post 

TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Today's Featured Article - Memories of an IH Super A When I was ? up to 10, I worked on my Papaw's farm in Greeneville, TN every summer. As I grew older (7), it was the thrill of my day to ride or drive on the tractor. My Papaw had a 1954 IH Super A that he bought to replace a Cub. My Papaw raised "baccer" (tobacco) and corn with the Super A, but the fondest memory was of the sawmill. He owned a small sawmill for sawing "baccer" sticks. The Super A was the powerplant. When I was old enough (7 or 8), I would get up early and be dressed to ... [Read Article]

Latest Ad: Variable pulley for case 1530 skid loader [More Ads]

Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy