Posted by ScottyHOMEy on August 21, 2009 at 07:47:46 from (71.241.214.214):
In Reply to: difference posted by GYM on August 21, 2009 at 06:57:38:
Now there's a loaded quesation.
I would say level of detail, accuracy to the original.
There are purists of every level. Some, usually referred to as the correct police, can be a pain. They will wander all over a show and find somthing to tear down about every piece there. Interestingly, they rarely have any of their own work on display.
Now that I've got that out of my system . . .
There are things like hose clamps. If the tractor was built with castle or spring-wire clamps, use of the more common clamps with a worm screw drawing a threaded band would be a step back from restoration.
I saw a post this morning from someone looking for a source for the old dot-head bolts. Some folks would consider the presence of a graded bolt (indicated by the hashmarks on the head) to be a step back toward rebuilding instead of restoration.
Some will cut it so fine as to get down to the type paint. Modern acrylics would be taboo to that bunch.
Those restored by the purest of the purists will be run no more than it takes to load and unload them. Lord knows, if the rings ever get seated, it won't be the same as it came from the factory. That's a little overboard, in my view.
To be fair, the opposite extreme is what some call the "DuPont" or "rattlecan" restoration, which is to get it running and painted. That is a rebuild/overhaul, not a restoration.
And there's lots of room between the two extremes to draw the line between them.
We sell tractor parts! We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]
Today's Featured Article - Tractor Profile: Farmall M - by Staff. H so that mountable implements were interchaneable. The Farmall M was most popular with large-acreage row-crop farmers. It was powered by either a high-compression gas engine or a distillate version with lower compression. Options included the Lift-All hydraulic system, a belt pulley, PTO, rubber tires, starter, lights and a swinging drawbar. It could be ordered in the high-crop, wide-front or tricycle configurations. The high-crop version was called a Model MV.
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
1964 I-H 140 tractor with cultivators and sidedresser. Starts and runs good. Asking 2650. CALL RON AT 502-319-1952
[More Ads]
All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy
TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.
