Posted by Ross Bryner on October 23, 2009 at 08:06:11 from (74.214.224.112):
In Reply to: 686 vs 684 or 784 posted by Ross Bryner on October 22, 2009 at 09:46:56:
THANKS to all you folks for the replies and comments !
Thanks 495 man for educating me on the 884's transmission. I mistakenly thought It had the same 16F 4R trans. as the bigger IH tractors. That makes me feel alot better about considering an 884 (72 p.t.o. h.p. stock !) as well as the other 84 series.
Still, those big old 6 bangers in the 656, 666 and 686's just seem to lug right along and those series of row-crops are big tractors !
I'll just have to 'carefully' buy the best thing I can find for the money I will want to spend.
We sell tractor parts! We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]
All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy
TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.