Posted by JDseller on May 29, 2012 at 00:20:05 from (208.126.196.144):
In Reply to: Vietnam Missing posted by JerryS on May 28, 2012 at 22:39:50:
In a combat situations things can get confusing very fast. Some units where not really trained well or had higher percentages of new men. That first enemy contact is scary at first. Some men handle it better than others. So a single man could very easily get separated from his group. He then would have been listed as MIA ( Missing IN Action) This is one way that a man could be lost.
There are other ways that it could have happened too. I was lucky in that I was in a small unit that was usually very well trained. We had men killed but NEVER left one behind or had a man go missing. We rescued a lot of air men but we also could not find a few of them too. We might find the plane but not the men. They may have jumped out before and where far from where we found the plane. Sometimes we could not find the plane at all.
You have to remember that the electronic age was just starting then. We had no GPS stuff to tell where you where at. You had a map and a compass to try and keep track of where you were. The radios had a limited range and not good reliability either. I often wonder what satellite photos could have helped with back then.
I would say that a lot of the missing men would have been Air Force guys. Then the next higher chance would have been just the regular Army guys that got involved in the big operations. The more men the harder to keep track of them.
I also personally know of LRRPs that just disappeared. They where dropped off and never heard from again. This happened several times toward the end. I always thought that a spy was giving the drop zones away. I know it got much harder to be dropped into an area clean the last year or so. It seemed like we where always getting dropped into hot zones.
These are just a few observations from me. I am sure there are other guys that can tell you more of how that number was came to.
We sell tractor parts! We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]
Today's Featured Article - Product Review: Black Tire Paint - by Staff. I have been fortunate in that two of my tractors have had rear tires that were in great shape when I bought the tractor. My model "H" even had the old style fronts with plenty of tread. My "L" fronts were mismatched Sears Guardsman snow tires, which I promptly tossed. Well, although these tires were in good shape as far as tread was concerned, they looked real sad. All were flat, but new tubes fixed that. In addition to years and years of scuffing and fading, they had paint splattered on
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
2022 John Deere 5045E, 4wd, front end loader and 3rd function with grapple. 120 hrs, 55k new, must sell
[More Ads]
All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy
TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.
