Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver
 
Marketplace
Classified Ads
Photo Ads
Tractor Parts
Salvage

Community
Discussion Forums
Project Journals
Your Stories
Events Calendar
Hauling Schedule

Galleries
Tractor Photos
Implement Photos
Vintage Photos
Help Identify
Parts & Pieces
Stuck & Troubled
Vintage Ads
Community Album
Photo Ad Archives

Research & Info
Articles
Tractor Registry
Tip of the Day
Safety Cartoons
Tractor Values
Serial Numbers
Tune-Up Guide
Paint Codes
List Prices
Production Nbrs
Tune-Up Specs
Torque Values
3-Point Specs
Glossary

Miscellaneous
Tractor Games
Just For Kids
Virtual Show
Museum Guide
Memorial Page
Feedback Form

Yesterday's Tractors Facebook Page

  
Tractor Talk Discussion Board

Re: OT Atals Shrugged


[ Expand ] [ View Replies ] [ Add a Reply ] [ Return to Forum ]

Posted by wisbaker on November 10, 2012 at 11:22:50 from (207.118.181.192):

In Reply to: OT Atals Shrugged posted by Bryan iniowa on November 10, 2012 at 06:34:40:

Venture capitalists and vultures? The current situation with venture capitalists is nothing more than a market response to market force barriers WE (our government) put into to place to try to make things "fair". A strong healthy well managed business is not going to tie up with a venture capitalist, they have no need to. Now if a apparently strong healthy business ties up with a venture capitalist it might be for other reasons, like a particularly onerous labor contract has them at a disadvantage against a new upstart competitor and the venture capitalist is going to lean them to be competitive and save jobs or recapture the value of the company for the shareholders (owners)by eliminating obligations of lessor position. These market forces may also be due to governmental regulations.

The largest single taxpayer and employer here in our county was a paper mill way up in the northern part of our county. It had been sold a few times and the last owner was a much a venture capitalist as a mill operator. When they shut it down there were all kinds of cries about the greedy venture capitalist. Yes the plant was making money but the owners of the plant could take the money they had invested in the plant put it in bank CDs and get more money with less risk. In fact they shut this and several other area mills down and shifted the production from these plants to other newer and more efficient mills they owned in states with a more favorable business climate and in doing so their stockholders, many of who are retirees who invested their savings in this company, would get a fair dividend that accurately rewards them for the risk they are taking.

In many cases our tax code has forced smaller family owned businesses out of family control, they were sold to pay taxes or the next generation of the family felt there were better opportunities for them than owning a hardware store, automobile dealer, Implement companies (keeping it tractor related) home town grocery store or what ever the business was.

We want to punish the rich and our tax code is so structured and in many cases it's biased against business owners. When I worked for the county my salary was about $50,000 a year- that's middle class and not really excessive however as a department head I also new the actual cost to the taxpayers for my services after all benefits were paid was $93,000. If my wife earns the same amount and we happened to make it in our business all of a sudden we're the evil rich that must be punished.

Wealth is not created in a vacuum. Let's look at the simple transaction of buying/selling a $20,000 new car. When a new $20,000 car is sold in a state with a 5% sales tax and a .5% local option tax the salesman makes about 1/10 of his monthly sales (on average), the dealer anywhere from 1% to maybe 5% of their monthly sales goal, the state gets $1,000 in sales tax and $100 for tag & title transfer, the county $100. Let's say we pass a new mandate for fuel efficiency or safety and that results in 100 fewer people buying cars that year. The car dealers need one less sales man, the state losses $100,000 in tax revenue (say good bye to a social worker or trooper or snow plow driver) and losses another $1000 in title and tag transfer fees, the county losses $1,000. Because the automaker needs 100 fewer cars 1 1/2 $70,000 a year auto workers aren't needed and so it goes on.

What really is fair?- according to our constitution and our laws we are all supposed to be equal in the eyes of the law or government. I say FAIRNESS is when we take the cost of the government and divide it by the number of people served and that's the tax for the year. If we looked at it that way people would be less inclined to want more from the government if they new it was going to increase their taxes. Is it really "fair" that I pay a percentage of my paycheck (with my employer paying the same amount) in social security and earn the top benefit, yet some one who may of made less than me and paid substantially less into Social security than me may get a benefit of the same value?


Replies:




Add a Reply

:
:
:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Advanced Posting Options

: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.



 
Advanced Posting Tools
  Upload Photo  Select Gallery Photo  Attach Serial # List 
Return to Post 

TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Today's Featured Article - Listening to Your Tractor - by Curtis Von Fange. Years ago there was a TV show about a talking car. Unless you are from another planet, physically or otherwise, I don’t think our internal combustion buddies will talk and tell us their problems. But, on the other hand, there is a secret language that our mechanical companions readily do speak. It is an interesting form of communication that involves all the senses of the listener. In this series we are going to investigate and learn the basic rudimentary skills of understanding this lingo. ... [Read Article]

Latest Ad: 2022 John Deere 5045E, 4wd, front end loader and 3rd function with grapple. 120 hrs, 55k new, must sell [More Ads]

Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy