but you do have to be careful with such detail numbers.
Many cost accountants come out with figures like that, then everybody assumes that each letter sent must be carefully considered because they each cost $50, which is a huge mistake.
It doesn't include the spare time factor - it assumes that the workers are working at perfect peak efficiency at that one task.
In fact, if it's costing a company that much to send a letter - it almost proves they're not working at peak efficiency.
If the people who send the letters are ALREADY a cost - the cost of sending an ADDITIONAL letter is the cost of sending an additional letter.
In simple terms:
Say you have a letter sending department that costs $100,000 per year to operate.
They send out 2000 letters per year. Dividing $100,000 by 2000 letters means each letter cost $50 per year.
Say that department came upon a decision point to resolve a $35 mistake that would require sending a letter.
Armed with the knowledge that letters cost $50 each, it wouldn't be worth sending it.
However - in reality the department will not be operating at peak performance levels. There's room for them to send an extra letter without hiring new employees or paying overtime.
So that letter would most likely cost only the additional postage, paper, and ink.
In fact, sending the extra letter could LOWER the annual per letter costs.
You're now dividing that $100,000 (plus a stamp and peice of paper) by 2001 instead of 2000.
And somewhere a manager will be proudly presenting his per letter cost savings to his superiors - and they'd be right - but in a very misleading way.
This post was edited by JRSutton at 08:54:55 11/27/12.
We sell tractor parts! We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]
Today's Featured Article - 12-Volt Conversions for 4-Cylinder Ford 2000 & 4000 Tractors - by Tommy Duvall. After two summers of having to park my old 1964 model 4000 gas 4 cyl. on a hill just in case the 6 volt system, for whatever reason, would not crank her, I decided to try the 12 volt conversion. After some research of convert or not, I decided to go ahead, the main reason being that this tractor was a working tractor, not a show tractor (yet). I did keep everything I replaced for the day I do want to restore her to showroom condition.
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
1964 I-H 140 tractor with cultivators and sidedresser. Starts and runs good. Asking 2650. CALL RON AT 502-319-1952
[More Ads]
All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy
TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.
