When considering a piece of legislation, the first question should be "what problem is this supposed to solve?" And if it doesn't solve that problem, or, as is often the case, the problem doesn't exist, what's the point of the bill?
Your pet bill won't build a single mile of road. In the midwest, there are few if any non-union contractors big enough to bid on major highway projects. Repealing a old law protecting unions is not going to change that fact, and your legislators know that. So what's their REAL motivation? It's smoke and mirrors to present the illusion they're working on the road problem, when they in fact have no intention of doing anything constructive. Building highways is HARD because it takes MONEY. Passing pointless union-bashing bills, on the other hand, is as easy as pie.
Here in Michigan we have a similar situation. The roads and bridges are decrepit, and the obvious solution is to raise fuel taxes. Given that one party, the Know-Nothings, has control of both houses of the legislature and the governor's seat, you'd think they could agree on a way to do this. NOT A CHANCE! It seems they couldn't figure out a way to raise taxes without being accused of raising taxes. So they punted. In May we get to vote whether or not to raise the state sales tax, a portion of which will go to funding roads. The chances of this bill passing are slim. Either way the taxpayers get to foot the bill for a special election because the legislators couldn't bring themselves to do their jobs. Of course this election is a can't lose proposition for the legislature: If it fails, they can say "the voters don't want the roads fixed." If it passes, they'll says "We never voted for a tax increase!" Nice.
We sell tractor parts! We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]
Today's Featured Article - Grain Threshing in the Early 40's - by Jerry D. Coleman. How many of you can sit there and say that you have plowed with a mule? Well I would say not many, but maybe a few. This story is about the day my Grandfather Brown (true name) decided along with my parents to purchase a new Ford tractor. It wasn't really new except to us. The year was about 1967 and my father found a good used Ford 601 tractor to use on the farm instead of "Bob", our old mule. Now my grandfather had had this mule since the mid 40's and he was getting some age on him. S
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
1964 I-H 140 tractor with cultivators and sidedresser. Starts and runs good. Asking 2650. CALL RON AT 502-319-1952
[More Ads]
All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy
TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.
