Posted by paul on April 07, 2015 at 10:31:59 from (76.77.197.114):
In Reply to: Re: gmo posted by 1130Leo on April 07, 2015 at 08:47:57:
So, are you opposed to gmo, or are you opposed to glyphosate?
Two different issues, I often see them somehow confused or interchanged in the same argument, which makes no sense.
You may be opposed to both, but still poor of you to confuse the argument into a single deal, because they are not the same argument.
Gmo is about splicing genes together in different combinations. Is that a good or bad idea to try to advance our place here on earth.
And is glyphosate a good product that has more positives than negatives in weed control/ food supplies on this planet.
There are many gmo crops that have nothing to do with glyphosate - Liberty Link and insect control as a few. Several new ones have been developed and working their way through testing and permitting now.
It is all about identifying the problems, and the solutions, and choosing the best options amongst them.
Everything is a risk vs reward.
We still use asbestos in some rare places, because it still ends up being the far better and safer product for those places.
So this is black and white, as you portray.
Evaluate the risks vs the rewards.
No glyphosate, we return to the use of more probably harsher weed chemicals.
No herbicides at all. We return to more soil erosion, more diesel fuel needed, more crop losses to weed outbreaks.
Thre is always a risk and reward.
I don't see that proper science in your reply, you have a belief, not a scientific theory........
That's fine, but doesn't mean so much to others.
Can you frame your beliefs within science and list the risks and rewards of what you want vs what we have?
Upload one or more videos to your post. Photo filesizes should be less than 300K and Videos, less than 2MB. Formats allowed are gif, jpg, png, ogg, mp4, mov, and avi. Be sure to use filenames without spaces or special characters, and filetypes of 3 digits lower case.
We sell tractor parts! We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]
Today's Featured Article - 12-Volt Conversions for 4-Cylinder Ford 2000 & 4000 Tractors - by Tommy Duvall. After two summers of having to park my old 1964 model 4000 gas 4 cyl. on a hill just in case the 6 volt system, for whatever reason, would not crank her, I decided to try the 12 volt conversion. After some research of convert or not, I decided to go ahead, the main reason being that this tractor was a working tractor, not a show tractor (yet). I did keep everything I replaced for the day I do want to restore her to showroom condition.
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
1964 I-H 140 tractor with cultivators and sidedresser. Starts and runs good. Asking 2650. CALL RON AT 502-319-1952
[More Ads]
All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy
TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.
