Without comparing plans/spec's for each, its going to be hard to accurately comment on something like this.
I would be inclined to agree that the certified model/design, takes all aspects/details in consideration to the design to arrive at the number you stated, 130MPH. The building itself has to be designed to tolerate the winds per the specifications, in this case 130 MPH as applicable to loading considerations to their product. It would do no good to anchor a flimsy building substantially, anchor will hold, but the building fails. So I would expect better materials, some design redundancy, bracing and whatever else is needed to meet the criteria.
In theory, for what you propose to do, given the conditions you describe, if the manufacturers anchor design will not work in the conditions you have, I would have the manufacturer confirm the type you want to use,(what you described above) so you know in your conditions you have met or exceeded what is needed to hold. Ideally you would want to actually test it to meet spec's or to failure, note the details of same and compare to what the building needs. That may sound ridiculous for something like this, but there's validity in doing this to KNOW the what you have, but not likely feasible for a typical owner. Common sense applies and there is sure to be an alternate detail that will work.
I would imagine a concrete detail, tied into the sub-soils properly should suffice to provide enough resistance, I'd just let the manufacturer detail that for your job. If you go through the trouble/expense of putting up the hay, value of any equipment you store there and a strong weather event occurs, its good to be on the overkill side. Well as much as is feasible without it being wasteful just the same.
Upload one or more videos to your post. Photo filesizes should be less than 300K and Videos, less than 2MB. Formats allowed are gif, jpg, png, ogg, mp4, mov, and avi. Be sure to use filenames without spaces or special characters, and filetypes of 3 digits lower case.
We sell tractor parts! We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]
Today's Featured Article - Restoration Story: Fordson Major - by Anthony West. George bought his Fordson Major from a an implement sale about 18 years ago for £200.00 (UK). There is no known history regarding its origins or what service it had done, but the following work was undertaken alone to bring it up to show standard. From the engine number, it was found that this Major was produced late 1946. It was almost complete but had various parts that would definitely need replacing.
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
1964 I-H 140 tractor with cultivators and sidedresser. Starts and runs good. Asking 2650. CALL RON AT 502-319-1952
[More Ads]
All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy
TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.
