I just watched a documentary the other day that knocked Halsey pretty bad. I got to thinking.
It's easy to knock him after you see the results of his actions in the battle of Leyte Gulf. But.......
1. US intel on Japanese strength was non existent throughout the entire war. Kinda hard to get agents in and out of Japan at the time.
2. Air power, both naval and land based had completely changed the face or warfare in a very few short years. The biggest naval threat throughout the war to that date was air attack in the Pacific.
3. Being the man on the scene at the time. It's easy to arm chair any officer or combat operation. Being the man, there on the spot, making decisions based on intel and threat can and often does look very different that what it will look like after the fact.
In the case mentioned take notice that most if not all text involving Leyte Gulf someplace toward the front of it always mentions what the Japanese true strength was. Information available to the reader that wasn't available to ANYONE in the US military while the battle was going on and certainly not Halsey. We read/see that the carriers that Jap sent out had few aircraft of any type. That it was a ruse. Halsey had no way of knowing that. We read that after initial contact the northern Japanese force withdrew, then turned around to renew the attack. Halsey had know way of knowing that. So we come down to Halsey leaving his station to go after the carrier fleet. Go take a look at all standard naval orders of the day. They read something like "you are to screen the invasion force" and so on, then add in that if the opportunity arises where you can without screwing up the first part "destroy the enemy" at every opportunity.
So IMO the only thing Halsey did wrong was a judgement call. He thought the northern attack was in retreat, a surface force, and the real threat was the carriers. Given the intel available to him at the time? Really a reasonable call.
We sell tractor parts! We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]
Today's Featured Article - Product Review: Black Tire Paint - by Staff. I have been fortunate in that two of my tractors have had rear tires that were in great shape when I bought the tractor. My model "H" even had the old style fronts with plenty of tread. My "L" fronts were mismatched Sears Guardsman snow tires, which I promptly tossed. Well, although these tires were in good shape as far as tread was concerned, they looked real sad. All were flat, but new tubes fixed that. In addition to years and years of scuffing and fading, they had paint splattered on
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
2022 John Deere 5045E, 4wd, front end loader and 3rd function with grapple. 120 hrs, 55k new, must sell
[More Ads]
All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy
TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.
