Re: Climate change

Posted by Deutz Lover on December 08, 2017 at 08:29:09 from (174.218.139.73):

In Reply to: Climate change posted by rrman61 on December 08, 2017 at 04:45:38:

There is still a lot of argument among scientists which is good because it shows that everyone does not follow in lockstep. The fact is that as the concerned scientists examine the evidence more and more agree that there is planetary warming.

1. Carbon dioxide levels are rising. One of the biggest dangers is that it dissolves in water more than most gases and makes the oceans more acidic. A lot of marine organisms have calcium carbonate as part of their exoskeletons such as clams, oysters, etc. The more acidic the water the more difficult it is to form exoskeletons and shells and will also dissolve them much like vinegar will dissolve the shell off of a chicken egg.

A similar example is stalagmite and stalactite formation in limestone caves with dripping water. If you have drip irrigation your emitters will slowly clog with calcium carbonate if the water comes from a limestone aquifer. The source water has to be acidified to dissolve it and keep it from happening. Look at the coral reefs across the world as they slowly dissolve.

In my opinion the earth cannot sustain a human population of much over 500 million to one billion and beyond this is deficit spending.

That is just one area to observe. Predictive science does not say there will be warming everywhere but sporadic changes in weather patterns. We have had three severe landfall hurricanes this year, but only time will tell if it will continue this way.

It does not matter if it is totally man made, but there is no need to contribute to it by using fossil fuels and not develop alternate energy sources.

There are also health considerations. Burning coal releases mercury and other heavy metals into the atmosphere. The runoff from rains contains these and they end up in the soil and eventually in the streams, rivers, and oceans. Eaten any swordfish lately?

Your can deny science all you want, but in order to disprove this you need to check historically back over many many years and millennia in soils, rocks, and old ice plus permafrost to check what was already here globally. So far what has been checked tends to verify man made contaminates raising these levels. Many scientists (by that I don't mean one) do this not to prove man's impact, but to verify it. They are being objective not subjective and are just checking facts. Science is self-correcting. There is no major conspiracy among them.

Replies:

• Re: Climate change Crazy Horse 14:43:20 12/08/17 (0)
• Re: Climate change VADAVE 13:02:19 12/08/17 (0)

Add a Reply Name: E-Mail: Subject: Comments: Optional Link URL: Link Title: Optional Image URL: Optional Video Title: Optional Video URL: Email Notification: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.   Advanced Posting Tools   Upload Photo  Select Gallery Photo  Attach Serial # List  Return to Post

TRACTOR PARTS	TRACTOR MANUALS

We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]