Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver
 
Marketplace
Classified Ads
Photo Ads
Tractor Parts
Salvage

Community
Discussion Forums
Project Journals
Your Stories
Events Calendar
Hauling Schedule

Galleries
Tractor Photos
Implement Photos
Vintage Photos
Help Identify
Parts & Pieces
Stuck & Troubled
Vintage Ads
Community Album
Photo Ad Archives

Research & Info
Articles
Tractor Registry
Tip of the Day
Safety Cartoons
Tractor Values
Serial Numbers
Tune-Up Guide
Paint Codes
List Prices
Production Nbrs
Tune-Up Specs
Torque Values
3-Point Specs
Glossary

Miscellaneous
Tractor Games
Just For Kids
Virtual Show
Museum Guide
Memorial Page
Feedback Form

Yesterday's Tractors Facebook Page

  
Tractor Talk Discussion Board

Re: 8/7/42 US Marines land on Guadalcanal


[ Expand ] [ View Replies ] [ Add a Reply ] [ Return to Forum ]

Posted by oldtanker on August 08, 2018 at 08:14:13 from (66.228.255.59):

In Reply to: 8/7/42 US Marines land on Guadalcanal posted by Ultradog MN on August 07, 2018 at 05:09:31:

Quoting Removed, click Modern View to see

Yes at some point prior to invading Guadalcanal someone realized that the ships were loaded wrong and the strike prevented them for being reloaded but that means when those ships left the US someone had not figured out how they had to be loaded. It was after all the 1st of many landings that the US would make (not all in the Pacific) during the war. With the nations neutrality laws prior to 7 Dec 1941 no one really gave invading anything much thought. Most thought was defensive, not offensive. So packing a ship for an invasion with plans to offload in primitive conditions had not had much is any effort put into it.

Prior to WWII but post WWI all US military effort was aimed at defense. If troops were deployed, like they were to South America in the late 20's and 30's (look up banana wars), they expected to sail into a friendly or secured harbor with docking facilities. They expected to be able to off load ships in a somewhat relaxed atmosphere. No one spent any effort at planning an invasion. The brass would have been horrified at the very idea. All it would take is a disgruntled junior officer or enlisted clerk working on it to let a congressman or senator know about it or leak it to the news media. Congress would not have been amused at the head lines "US NAVY PLANING TO INVADE"! Not too long before the attack on Pearl Harbor they had guys throwing punches in congress over our isolationist laws. So I'm not faulting the Navy for not really knowing what they were doing 8 months after Pearl. Heck even after Coral Sea and Midway they were still trying to figure out the shift from battleships to carriers.

Have any of you guys interested in WWII ever wondered why the Navy and US Army never figured out pre-invasion bombardment through the entire war? It's even more confusing after you look at England's "earthquake bomb" that could have really disrupted Japanese cave defensive positions. The "tall boy" bomb was available Jun 44. Those dropped on the islands would have had much greater effect on the Japanese that the battleships guns did. They left a crater 80 feet across and 24 feet deep and could penetrate about 16 feet of concrete. Just a side note......

Rick


Replies:




Add a Reply

:
:
:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.


 
Advanced Posting Tools
  Upload Photo  Select Gallery Photo  Attach Serial # List 
Return to Post 

TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Today's Featured Article - Listening to Your Tractor - by Curtis Von Fange. Years ago there was a TV show about a talking car. Unless you are from another planet, physically or otherwise, I don’t think our internal combustion buddies will talk and tell us their problems. But, on the other hand, there is a secret language that our mechanical companions readily do speak. It is an interesting form of communication that involves all the senses of the listener. In this series we are going to investigate and learn the basic rudimentary skills of understanding this lingo. ... [Read Article]

Latest Ad: 2022 John Deere 5045E, 4wd, front end loader and 3rd function with grapple. 120 hrs, 55k new, must sell [More Ads]

Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy