I know everybody wants everything to be simple, but there's always a more complicated version of the story when all the facts are put out on the table. I'm guessing this is no exception.
First off, WHO voted for this $10 million bond? The school board or the voters? Your post implies that the school board did it on their own? I doubt that's possible, or at least if it is in NE, you're one of the few states where this could happen. Most bonding issues have to go to the ballot.
Secondly, what does state law require as far as the provisioning of a school? How far are you allowed to bus students on a pupil average unit? Many state laws give no choice in the matter, you have to have a school within X miles of the average pupil over a given timeframe. This prevents exactly the situation you describe where a bunch of people get together and decide it's not "worth" spending all that money on a school when the kids could just ride 40 miles each way over to the next big town and go to school there.
Finally, the $10 million price tag may also be state dictated in terms of the requirements for each school REGARDLESS of enrollment. In most states, there is a laundry list of things you MUST provide in each school. You can't just pull a bunch of trailer houses together and call it good like California tried to do or build a 1 room schoolhouse heated by a coal stove.
Again, I'm thinking that the real story is a lot more complex than just the headline of "Runaway School Board Spends $10 Million of Your Money".
If you think education is expensive, try living in a country without it for a while. They don't spend anything on schools in Zimbabwe. And it shows.
Upload one or more videos to your post. Photo and video filesizes should be less than 5MB. Formats allowed are gif, jpg, png, ogg, mp4, mov, and avi. Be sure to use filenames without spaces or special characters, and filetypes of 3 digits lower case.
We sell tractor parts! We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]
Today's Featured Article - Grain Threshing in the Early 40's - by Jerry D. Coleman. How many of you can sit there and say that you have plowed with a mule? Well I would say not many, but maybe a few. This story is about the day my Grandfather Brown (true name) decided along with my parents to purchase a new Ford tractor. It wasn't really new except to us. The year was about 1967 and my father found a good used Ford 601 tractor to use on the farm instead of "Bob", our old mule. Now my grandfather had had this mule since the mid 40's and he was getting some age on him. S
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
1964 I-H 140 tractor with cultivators and sidedresser. Starts and runs good. Asking 2650. CALL RON AT 502-319-1952
[More Ads]
All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy
TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.
