The biggest reason is that Menards probably has one truss design for the building of your dimensions, and they are not customized to the building and location, rather they just look up in a table and it tells them the maximum spacing for a "Menards" truss. So whether the walls are stick built (garage) or poles, you need the same truss spacing for the snow loads in your area. And since your truss spacing is so close, the difference in vertical lumber (3 pieces per pole or spacing every 16" for stick built) probably is not saving any lumber.
On a pole barn you would span 2x4s horizontally for the metal sheating support, but you mentioned sheathing on the garage with OSB, so probably a wash there.
You mentioned you want a shingled roof, so decking and shingles so the roof is basically the same cost (Metal roof would probably be alot cheaper and the biggest cost differential between a normal metal roof pole barn and a shingle roof "garage")
However if you go to a pole barn manufacture, and specify that you want them to be conservative on the snow load, they would most likely custom design the trusses (and spacing) for your application and location and optimize the design further, which would probably save material, but they might charge more for the design than the generic menards version.
In theory if you wanted 20' spacing on the poles, it can still hold the snow load, IF the trusses are specifically design and engineered for your area and the proper snow load. 20' may not be the most efficient or cheapest either but it can be done.
Upload one or more videos to your post. Photo and video filesizes should be less than 5MB. Formats allowed are gif, jpg, png, ogg, mp4, mov, and avi. Be sure to use filenames without spaces or special characters, and filetypes of 3 digits lower case.
We sell tractor parts! We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]
Today's Featured Article - Earthmaster Project Progress Just a little update on my Earthmaster......it's back from the dead! I pulled the head, and soaked the stuck valves with mystery oil overnight, re-installed the head, and bingo, the compression returned. But alas, my carb foiled me again, it would fire a second then flood out. After numerous dead ends for a replacement carb, I went to work fixing mine.I soldered new floats on the float arm, they came from an old motorcycle carb, replaced the packing on the throttle shaft with o-rings, cut new ga
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
1964 I-H 140 tractor with cultivators and sidedresser. Starts and runs good. Asking 2650. CALL RON AT 502-319-1952
[More Ads]
All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy
TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.