Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver
 
Marketplace
Classified Ads
Photo Ads
Tractor Parts
Salvage

Community
Discussion Forums
Project Journals
Your Stories
Events Calendar
Hauling Schedule

Galleries
Tractor Photos
Implement Photos
Vintage Photos
Help Identify
Parts & Pieces
Stuck & Troubled
Vintage Ads
Community Album
Photo Ad Archives

Research & Info
Articles
Tractor Registry
Tip of the Day
Safety Cartoons
Tractor Values
Serial Numbers
Tune-Up Guide
Paint Codes
List Prices
Production Nbrs
Tune-Up Specs
Torque Values
3-Point Specs
Glossary

Miscellaneous
Tractor Games
Just For Kids
Virtual Show
Museum Guide
Memorial Page
Feedback Form

Yesterday's Tractors Facebook Page

  
Tractor Talk Discussion Board

Re: Narrow or Wide Front - what's your preference ???


[ View Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Return to Forum ]

Posted by The Dukester on September 21, 2001 at 18:26:06 from (216.93.119.163):

In Reply to: Narrow or Wide Front - what's your preference ??? posted by Just Wondering on September 18, 2001 at 14:57:01:

Well, I've had and used both types and spent a lot of hours on my uncle's W-6 Standard or wheatland style too.
For one tractor type farming like it was for a lot of family farms you couldn't beat a row crop or tricycle type because of their versatility and all the implements that were designed for them. With a Farmall H or M, a John Deere A or B or G, an Allis WC or WD, A Oliver 70, 77 or 88, or a Case SC or DC, you could do a complete job of farming with implements designed for the tractor. Wide front versions were available but few were sold here in the midwest.
I've never cultivated with a wide front row crop, but it's hard for me to imagine what it would be like to handle a 4 row on my GW John Deere. I know one could be mounted on it--that's why the front wheels are set out front so far.
I sure liked my old Super M and 4 row(after I got used to that steering and got a 4 spoke wheel).
But, plowing with the GW is a delight compared to the Super M and I can imagine disking would be easier too. When the field is fitted down like we used to do it, planting would be easier with the narrow front I guess.
Plowing and tillage work with the W-6 was okay, but it seemed to be harder to handle compared to row crop type tractors. We pulled the field chopper with it too, but it was work fighting that beast on the cornstalk stubble.
And at any job that tractor rode rougher than the row crops because of the narrower tread and shorter wheelbase. The later W-6's with bigger front tires were a lot easier to handle I heard.
The secret to tractor stability is rear wheel tread width more than anything else, wide front or narrow, and a wide front end won't save you if the rear wheels are narrowed up too far. And when the loader bucket is loaded and up to dumping height, any tractor is in a precarious situation on anything but smooth level ground at very slow speed going in a straight direction.
Sorry, I rambled on here, just trying to describe the situations and how it was with some tractors. There are certain advantages with each type and of course drawbacks too, it's just that the tractors were, and still are, dangerous in certain situations.
Old tractors are like old cars, they were a little crude, dangerous, and somestimes a handful to operate, but they all had a character of their own and operated safely they can still do a lot and be a lot of fun.


Follow Ups:




Post A Followup

:
:

: Re: Re: Narrow or Wide Front - what's your preference ???

:

:

:

:

: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Today's Featured Article - When Push Comes to Shove - by Dave Patterson. When I was a “kid” (still am to a deree) about two I guess, my parents couldn’t find me one day. They were horrified (we lived by the railroad), my mother thought the worst: "He’s been run over by a train, he’s gone forever!" Where did they find me? Perched up on the seat of the tractor. I’d probably plowed about 3000 acres (in my head anyway) by the time they found me. This is where my love for tractors started and has only gotten worse in my tender 50 yrs on this “green planet”. I’m par ... [Read Article]

Latest Ad: 1964 I-H 140 tractor with cultivators and sidedresser. Starts and runs good. Asking 2650. CALL RON AT 502-319-1952 [More Ads]

Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy