Posted by Dave41A on November 27, 2021 at 18:22:21 from (71.161.70.4):
In Reply to: Help identify rifle posted by cjunrau on November 27, 2021 at 17:04:14:
These were sometimes called Eddystone enfields. The action is different from that in the Lee-Enfield, which was a cock-on close rear lug design developed by James Paris Lee (an American). The Eddystone was known as the P14 (Pattern 1914) as the British attempted to resolve some perceived shortcomings in the Rifle, Short, Magazine, Lee-Enfield (SMLE) then in common issue for the British. The project was abandoned with the onset of WW1 as the British went to war with what they had. As the others have noted, the tooling and plants were located in the US (to build rifles for the British under contract), and the US pressed these into service in 1917 to make rifles of the same patterns but for US forces--in US service they were known as the Model 1917. The US had them chambered for 30-06, although yours is clearly British proofed. They were actually more widely used in WW1 by US forces than the official rifle of the time, the '03 Springfeld. This one has been extensively sporterized as the rear aperture sight assembly seems to have been ground off. Yours likely has a long history to it as the British proof marks on a 30-06 rifle is an odd combination. 303 British would not be re-chambered as 30-06 as the bore diameters are different--a complete re-barrel would be required. It is possible some work was done in Canada, which could also explain the British Imperial markings. Post some more pictures of other markings if you can.
Upload one or more videos to your post. Photo and video filesizes should be less than 5MB. Formats allowed are gif, jpg, png, ogg, mp4, mov, and avi. Be sure to use filenames without spaces or special characters, and filetypes of 3 digits lower case.
We sell tractor parts! We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]
Today's Featured Article - Product Review: Black Tire Paint - by Staff. I have been fortunate in that two of my tractors have had rear tires that were in great shape when I bought the tractor. My model "H" even had the old style fronts with plenty of tread. My "L" fronts were mismatched Sears Guardsman snow tires, which I promptly tossed. Well, although these tires were in good shape as far as tread was concerned, they looked real sad. All were flat, but new tubes fixed that. In addition to years and years of scuffing and fading, they had paint splattered on
... [Read Article]
Latest Ad:
2022 John Deere 5045E, 4wd, front end loader and 3rd function with grapple. 120 hrs, 55k new, must sell
[More Ads]
All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy
TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.
